Standard

What Was the Name of Mimnermus' Father? / Kazanskaya , M. N. .

In: Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2018, p. 592-610.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

Harvard

Kazanskaya , MN 2018, 'What Was the Name of Mimnermus' Father?', Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 592-610.

APA

Kazanskaya , M. N. (2018). What Was the Name of Mimnermus' Father? Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология, 22(1), 592-610.

Vancouver

Kazanskaya MN. What Was the Name of Mimnermus' Father? Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология. 2018;22(1):592-610.

Author

Kazanskaya , M. N. . / What Was the Name of Mimnermus' Father?. In: Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология. 2018 ; Vol. 22, No. 1. pp. 592-610.

BibTeX

@article{a8368cddf4e7422cab08a8e9c50977fc,
title = "What Was the Name of Mimnermus' Father?",
abstract = "The name of Mimnermus{\textquoteright} father is transmitted by the Suda in a biographical entry (μ 1077) that introduces the poet as Μίμνερμος Λιγυρτυάδου; the name of the poet{\textquoteright}s father is preserved by no other source. Although a priori there is little reason to doubt the transmitted form, it is difficult to reconcile it with Solon{\textquoteright}s address to Mimnermus as Λιγυᾳστάδης (Sol. fr. 20 West = Diog. Laert. 1, 61; cf. Sud. μ 1077), which manifestly is a compliment to Mimnermus but seems to make the name of Mimnermus{\textquoteright} father rather than the poet{\textquoteright}s own name the object of the pun. The article examines the advantages and the disadvantages of existing approaches to this problem and proposes a different solution, arguing that the transmitted form Λιγυρτυάδης must be an adjectival patronymic, not the actual name of Mimnermus{\textquoteright} father.",
keywords = "Мимнерм, Лигиртиад (Λιγυρτυάδης), Солон, патроним, Суда, Диоген Лаэрций, античная филология, ономастика Малой Азии, Mimnermus, Ligyrtyades (Λιγυρτυάδης), Solon, patronymic, Suda, Diogenes Laertius, ancient scholarship, onomastics of Asia Minor",
author = "Kazanskaya, {M. N.}",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "592--610",
journal = "Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология",
issn = "2306-9015",
publisher = "Институт лингвистических исследований РАН",
number = "1",
note = "null ; Conference date: 18-06-2018 Through 20-06-2018",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - What Was the Name of Mimnermus' Father?

AU - Kazanskaya , M. N.

N1 - Conference code: XXII

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The name of Mimnermus’ father is transmitted by the Suda in a biographical entry (μ 1077) that introduces the poet as Μίμνερμος Λιγυρτυάδου; the name of the poet’s father is preserved by no other source. Although a priori there is little reason to doubt the transmitted form, it is difficult to reconcile it with Solon’s address to Mimnermus as Λιγυᾳστάδης (Sol. fr. 20 West = Diog. Laert. 1, 61; cf. Sud. μ 1077), which manifestly is a compliment to Mimnermus but seems to make the name of Mimnermus’ father rather than the poet’s own name the object of the pun. The article examines the advantages and the disadvantages of existing approaches to this problem and proposes a different solution, arguing that the transmitted form Λιγυρτυάδης must be an adjectival patronymic, not the actual name of Mimnermus’ father.

AB - The name of Mimnermus’ father is transmitted by the Suda in a biographical entry (μ 1077) that introduces the poet as Μίμνερμος Λιγυρτυάδου; the name of the poet’s father is preserved by no other source. Although a priori there is little reason to doubt the transmitted form, it is difficult to reconcile it with Solon’s address to Mimnermus as Λιγυᾳστάδης (Sol. fr. 20 West = Diog. Laert. 1, 61; cf. Sud. μ 1077), which manifestly is a compliment to Mimnermus but seems to make the name of Mimnermus’ father rather than the poet’s own name the object of the pun. The article examines the advantages and the disadvantages of existing approaches to this problem and proposes a different solution, arguing that the transmitted form Λιγυρτυάδης must be an adjectival patronymic, not the actual name of Mimnermus’ father.

KW - Мимнерм

KW - Лигиртиад (Λιγυρτυάδης)

KW - Солон

KW - патроним

KW - Суда

KW - Диоген Лаэрций

KW - античная филология

KW - ономастика Малой Азии

KW - Mimnermus

KW - Ligyrtyades (Λιγυρτυάδης)

KW - Solon

KW - patronymic

KW - Suda

KW - Diogenes Laertius

KW - ancient scholarship

KW - onomastics of Asia Minor

UR - https://tronsky.iling.spb.ru/static/tronsky2018_01.pdf

M3 - Conference article

VL - 22

SP - 592

EP - 610

JO - Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология

JF - Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология

SN - 2306-9015

IS - 1

Y2 - 18 June 2018 through 20 June 2018

ER -

ID: 37449588