Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья в журнале по материалам конференции › Рецензирование
What Was the Name of Mimnermus' Father? / Kazanskaya , M. N. .
в: Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология, Том 22, № 1, 2018, стр. 592-610.Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья в журнале по материалам конференции › Рецензирование
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - What Was the Name of Mimnermus' Father?
AU - Kazanskaya , M. N.
N1 - Conference code: XXII
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - The name of Mimnermus’ father is transmitted by the Suda in a biographical entry (μ 1077) that introduces the poet as Μίμνερμος Λιγυρτυάδου; the name of the poet’s father is preserved by no other source. Although a priori there is little reason to doubt the transmitted form, it is difficult to reconcile it with Solon’s address to Mimnermus as Λιγυᾳστάδης (Sol. fr. 20 West = Diog. Laert. 1, 61; cf. Sud. μ 1077), which manifestly is a compliment to Mimnermus but seems to make the name of Mimnermus’ father rather than the poet’s own name the object of the pun. The article examines the advantages and the disadvantages of existing approaches to this problem and proposes a different solution, arguing that the transmitted form Λιγυρτυάδης must be an adjectival patronymic, not the actual name of Mimnermus’ father.
AB - The name of Mimnermus’ father is transmitted by the Suda in a biographical entry (μ 1077) that introduces the poet as Μίμνερμος Λιγυρτυάδου; the name of the poet’s father is preserved by no other source. Although a priori there is little reason to doubt the transmitted form, it is difficult to reconcile it with Solon’s address to Mimnermus as Λιγυᾳστάδης (Sol. fr. 20 West = Diog. Laert. 1, 61; cf. Sud. μ 1077), which manifestly is a compliment to Mimnermus but seems to make the name of Mimnermus’ father rather than the poet’s own name the object of the pun. The article examines the advantages and the disadvantages of existing approaches to this problem and proposes a different solution, arguing that the transmitted form Λιγυρτυάδης must be an adjectival patronymic, not the actual name of Mimnermus’ father.
KW - Мимнерм
KW - Лигиртиад (Λιγυρτυάδης)
KW - Солон
KW - патроним
KW - Суда
KW - Диоген Лаэрций
KW - античная филология
KW - ономастика Малой Азии
KW - Mimnermus
KW - Ligyrtyades (Λιγυρτυάδης)
KW - Solon
KW - patronymic
KW - Suda
KW - Diogenes Laertius
KW - ancient scholarship
KW - onomastics of Asia Minor
UR - https://tronsky.iling.spb.ru/static/tronsky2018_01.pdf
M3 - Conference article
VL - 22
SP - 592
EP - 610
JO - Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология
JF - Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология
SN - 2306-9015
IS - 1
Y2 - 18 June 2018 through 20 June 2018
ER -
ID: 37449588