ЧТО ТАКОЕ ИЛИ КТО ТАКИЕ "МЫ"? ХАЙДЕГГЕР И РЕКОНСТРУКЦИЯ ПОНЯТИЯ "НАРОД" (VOLK)

Standard

ЧТО ТАКОЕ ИЛИ КТО ТАКИЕ "МЫ"? ХАЙДЕГГЕР И РЕКОНСТРУКЦИЯ ПОНЯТИЯ "НАРОД" (VOLK). / Bojanic, Petar; Артеменко, Наталья Андреевна (Translator).

In: ВОПРОСЫ ФИЛОСОФИИ, No. 6, 2016, p. 46-56.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

BibTeX

@article{cb30c0f3ddab422abf12b52f19c7e62a,

title = "ЧТО ТАКОЕ ИЛИ КТО ТАКИЕ {"}МЫ{"}? ХАЙДЕГГЕР И РЕКОНСТРУКЦИЯ ПОНЯТИЯ {"}НАРОД{"} (VOLK)",

abstract = "The article analyzes four paragraphs (10-13) of Heidegger's 1934 Lectures (Logik als die Frage nach dem Wesen der Sprache). The author emphasizes Heidegger's argumentation that thematizes the pronoun {"}We{"} and reveals the role of {"}conversation with each other{"} in the constitution of the community. The article demonstrates that {"}correspondence with each other{"} along with {"}conversation with each other{"} takes on a special role in the world of modem communications and media. The author shows that the difference between a written and a verbal exchange is secondary in its significance in the same sense, in which a discussion or a correspondence of the members of the group confirms the very existence of the group (or the institution), but in principle can neither terminate the existence of the group, nor reveal it.",

keywords = "We, questioning, institution, techne, community, university",

author = "Petar Bojanic and Артеменко, {Наталья Андреевна}",

note = "Пер. с англ., нем. и франц. Майе Матсар, под ред. Н. Артёменко",

year = "2016",

language = "русский",

pages = "46--56",

journal = "ВОПРОСЫ ФИЛОСОФИИ",

issn = "0042-8744",

publisher = "Международная книга",

number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - ЧТО ТАКОЕ ИЛИ КТО ТАКИЕ "МЫ"? ХАЙДЕГГЕР И РЕКОНСТРУКЦИЯ ПОНЯТИЯ "НАРОД" (VOLK)

AU - Bojanic, Petar

A2 - Артеменко, Наталья Андреевна

N1 - Пер. с англ., нем. и франц. Майе Матсар, под ред. Н. Артёменко

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The article analyzes four paragraphs (10-13) of Heidegger's 1934 Lectures (Logik als die Frage nach dem Wesen der Sprache). The author emphasizes Heidegger's argumentation that thematizes the pronoun "We" and reveals the role of "conversation with each other" in the constitution of the community. The article demonstrates that "correspondence with each other" along with "conversation with each other" takes on a special role in the world of modem communications and media. The author shows that the difference between a written and a verbal exchange is secondary in its significance in the same sense, in which a discussion or a correspondence of the members of the group confirms the very existence of the group (or the institution), but in principle can neither terminate the existence of the group, nor reveal it.

AB - The article analyzes four paragraphs (10-13) of Heidegger's 1934 Lectures (Logik als die Frage nach dem Wesen der Sprache). The author emphasizes Heidegger's argumentation that thematizes the pronoun "We" and reveals the role of "conversation with each other" in the constitution of the community. The article demonstrates that "correspondence with each other" along with "conversation with each other" takes on a special role in the world of modem communications and media. The author shows that the difference between a written and a verbal exchange is secondary in its significance in the same sense, in which a discussion or a correspondence of the members of the group confirms the very existence of the group (or the institution), but in principle can neither terminate the existence of the group, nor reveal it.

KW - We

KW - questioning

KW - institution

KW - techne

KW - community

KW - university

UR - https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26421755

M3 - статья

SP - 46

EP - 56

JO - ВОПРОСЫ ФИЛОСОФИИ

JF - ВОПРОСЫ ФИЛОСОФИИ

SN - 0042-8744

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 41860369