Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
V.S. Solovyov and Modern Problems of Historiography and Source Study of Russian Philosophy. / Malinov, A.V.
в: Solov'evskie Issledovania, № 3, 30.09.2024, стр. 12-22.Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - V.S. Solovyov and Modern Problems of Historiography and Source Study of Russian Philosophy
AU - Malinov, A.V.
N1 - Export Date: 18 November 2024
PY - 2024/9/30
Y1 - 2024/9/30
N2 - The article presents answers to the following questions formulated by the editorial board of the journal “Solovyov Studies”: How do you assess the current state of research in this field and, in particular, the heritage of V.S. Solovyov? Is there obvious success in publishing the heritage of Russian philosophers and rather sufficient activity of relevant studies? What are the failures and what, in your opinion, are the reasons for them? In recent years in the community of researchers of the history of Russian philosophy one can hear the opinion that the philosophical heritage of V.S. Solovyov is irrelevant. In your opinion, has Solovyov lost his relevance? What aspects of his philosophical, literary and journalistic legacy have not yet been sufficiently developed, are there prospects for the development of the philosophy of unitotality, or does it belong entirely to history? The significance of V.S. Solovyov's legacy as the first, most developed philosophical system and the relevance of his teachings as the most successful example of philosophical thought in Russian are considered. The contribution of V.S. Solovyov to the development of philosophical terminology in Russia is pointed out. A brief outline of the historiography of Russian philosophy is given. It is noted that there is not a large number of critical editions of the sources of Russian philosophy, that the research of the history of Russian philosophy is not a priority in national science and educational policy, that there is not enough historiographical reflection. Modern researchers of Russian philosophy have not formulated fundamentally new approaches and belong to the same historiographical paradigm as the authors of the early 20th century. The situation can be changed by creating a new historical and philosophical narrative. © 2024 Ivanovo State Power Engineering University. All rights reserved.
AB - The article presents answers to the following questions formulated by the editorial board of the journal “Solovyov Studies”: How do you assess the current state of research in this field and, in particular, the heritage of V.S. Solovyov? Is there obvious success in publishing the heritage of Russian philosophers and rather sufficient activity of relevant studies? What are the failures and what, in your opinion, are the reasons for them? In recent years in the community of researchers of the history of Russian philosophy one can hear the opinion that the philosophical heritage of V.S. Solovyov is irrelevant. In your opinion, has Solovyov lost his relevance? What aspects of his philosophical, literary and journalistic legacy have not yet been sufficiently developed, are there prospects for the development of the philosophy of unitotality, or does it belong entirely to history? The significance of V.S. Solovyov's legacy as the first, most developed philosophical system and the relevance of his teachings as the most successful example of philosophical thought in Russian are considered. The contribution of V.S. Solovyov to the development of philosophical terminology in Russia is pointed out. A brief outline of the historiography of Russian philosophy is given. It is noted that there is not a large number of critical editions of the sources of Russian philosophy, that the research of the history of Russian philosophy is not a priority in national science and educational policy, that there is not enough historiographical reflection. Modern researchers of Russian philosophy have not formulated fundamentally new approaches and belong to the same historiographical paradigm as the authors of the early 20th century. The situation can be changed by creating a new historical and philosophical narrative. © 2024 Ivanovo State Power Engineering University. All rights reserved.
KW - historical and philosophical narrative
KW - historiography of Russian philosophy
KW - history of Russian philosophy
KW - language of philosophy
KW - philosophical school
KW - source study
KW - historical and philosophical narrative
KW - historiography of Russian philosophy
KW - history of Russian philosophy
KW - language of philosophy
KW - philosophical school
KW - source study
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/55b8dea7-bbdc-3a7b-bfd2-a7ef3db3b5da/
U2 - 10.17588/2076-9210.2024.3.012-022
DO - 10.17588/2076-9210.2024.3.012-022
M3 - статья
SP - 12
EP - 22
JO - СОЛОВЬЕВСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ
JF - СОЛОВЬЕВСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ
SN - 2076-9210
IS - 3
ER -
ID: 127407903