Standard

Social Networks and Public Policy: Place for Public Dialogue? / Neverov, Kirill; Budko, Diana.

Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet and Modern Society, IMS 2017. Том Part F133135 Association for Computing Machinery, 2017. стр. 189-194.

Результаты исследований: Публикации в книгах, отчётах, сборниках, трудах конференцийстатья в сборнике материалов конференцииРецензирование

Harvard

Neverov, K & Budko, D 2017, Social Networks and Public Policy: Place for Public Dialogue? в Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet and Modern Society, IMS 2017. Том. Part F133135, Association for Computing Machinery, стр. 189-194, XX Международная объединенная научная конференция «Интернет и современное общество», Санкт-Петербург, Российская Федерация, 21/06/17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3143699.3143700

APA

Neverov, K., & Budko, D. (2017). Social Networks and Public Policy: Place for Public Dialogue? в Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet and Modern Society, IMS 2017 (Том Part F133135, стр. 189-194). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3143699.3143700

Vancouver

Neverov K, Budko D. Social Networks and Public Policy: Place for Public Dialogue? в Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet and Modern Society, IMS 2017. Том Part F133135. Association for Computing Machinery. 2017. стр. 189-194 https://doi.org/10.1145/3143699.3143700

Author

Neverov, Kirill ; Budko, Diana. / Social Networks and Public Policy: Place for Public Dialogue?. Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet and Modern Society, IMS 2017. Том Part F133135 Association for Computing Machinery, 2017. стр. 189-194

BibTeX

@inproceedings{e5cf8f4b72ff4c61ace0ebe3b73a1d83,
title = "Social Networks and Public Policy: Place for Public Dialogue?",
abstract = "Wide use of Internet on the territory of the Russian Federation and, in particular, Web 2.0 technology development, promote the expansion of the number of Internet users among Russian citizens. Most of them have personal profiles in social networks (e.g. VKontakte, Facebook, Instagram) and make the audience of numerous public groups (or “publics”), virtual communities of different thematic focuses. Groups allow users to share political information and discuss burning issues. It is noteworthy that social networks users could act in various ways: create their own content or retransmit ideas of the others by making reposts. The study examined two types of virtual communities of well-known Russian network “VKontakte”: 1) pages of official authorities; 2) communities for discussion of politics (the five most popular). Content (including comments and discussions) and personal profiles of the most active participants (150 units at all) were studied. The study conducted through N. Fairclough{\textquoteright}s interpretation of critical discourse-analysis found that: 1) the main focus of pages of official authorities is spreading of official information and monitoring in the society that allows authorities to respond quickly on critical situations, while public have an opportunity to convey demands to officials; 2) social networks act as a place or forum for public dialogue on political issues and allow ordinary citizens not just “chill out”, but also create an illusion of possibility for each person to influence policy; 3) activity in virtual political communities does not correlate with quantity of the reposts from these communities to users{\textquoteright} personal profiles; moreover, it does not correlate with users{\textquoteright} positioning as an active participant of political discussions in front of his or her followers.",
keywords = "Political Participation, Public Dialogue, Public Policy, Social Networks, Virtual Political Communities, Vkontakte",
author = "Kirill Neverov and Diana Budko",
year = "2017",
month = jun,
day = "21",
doi = "10.1145/3143699.3143700",
language = "English",
volume = "Part F133135",
pages = "189--194",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet and Modern Society, IMS 2017",
publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery",
address = "United States",
note = "2017 International Conference on Internet and Modern Society, IMS 2017, IMS 2017 ; Conference date: 21-06-2017 Through 23-06-2017",
url = "http://icims.ifmo.ru/, http://ims.ifmo.ru/ru/pages/28/IMS_2017.htm",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Social Networks and Public Policy: Place for Public Dialogue?

AU - Neverov, Kirill

AU - Budko, Diana

N1 - Conference code: XX

PY - 2017/6/21

Y1 - 2017/6/21

N2 - Wide use of Internet on the territory of the Russian Federation and, in particular, Web 2.0 technology development, promote the expansion of the number of Internet users among Russian citizens. Most of them have personal profiles in social networks (e.g. VKontakte, Facebook, Instagram) and make the audience of numerous public groups (or “publics”), virtual communities of different thematic focuses. Groups allow users to share political information and discuss burning issues. It is noteworthy that social networks users could act in various ways: create their own content or retransmit ideas of the others by making reposts. The study examined two types of virtual communities of well-known Russian network “VKontakte”: 1) pages of official authorities; 2) communities for discussion of politics (the five most popular). Content (including comments and discussions) and personal profiles of the most active participants (150 units at all) were studied. The study conducted through N. Fairclough’s interpretation of critical discourse-analysis found that: 1) the main focus of pages of official authorities is spreading of official information and monitoring in the society that allows authorities to respond quickly on critical situations, while public have an opportunity to convey demands to officials; 2) social networks act as a place or forum for public dialogue on political issues and allow ordinary citizens not just “chill out”, but also create an illusion of possibility for each person to influence policy; 3) activity in virtual political communities does not correlate with quantity of the reposts from these communities to users’ personal profiles; moreover, it does not correlate with users’ positioning as an active participant of political discussions in front of his or her followers.

AB - Wide use of Internet on the territory of the Russian Federation and, in particular, Web 2.0 technology development, promote the expansion of the number of Internet users among Russian citizens. Most of them have personal profiles in social networks (e.g. VKontakte, Facebook, Instagram) and make the audience of numerous public groups (or “publics”), virtual communities of different thematic focuses. Groups allow users to share political information and discuss burning issues. It is noteworthy that social networks users could act in various ways: create their own content or retransmit ideas of the others by making reposts. The study examined two types of virtual communities of well-known Russian network “VKontakte”: 1) pages of official authorities; 2) communities for discussion of politics (the five most popular). Content (including comments and discussions) and personal profiles of the most active participants (150 units at all) were studied. The study conducted through N. Fairclough’s interpretation of critical discourse-analysis found that: 1) the main focus of pages of official authorities is spreading of official information and monitoring in the society that allows authorities to respond quickly on critical situations, while public have an opportunity to convey demands to officials; 2) social networks act as a place or forum for public dialogue on political issues and allow ordinary citizens not just “chill out”, but also create an illusion of possibility for each person to influence policy; 3) activity in virtual political communities does not correlate with quantity of the reposts from these communities to users’ personal profiles; moreover, it does not correlate with users’ positioning as an active participant of political discussions in front of his or her followers.

KW - Political Participation

KW - Public Dialogue

KW - Public Policy

KW - Social Networks

KW - Virtual Political Communities

KW - Vkontakte

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040708685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/3143699.3143700

DO - 10.1145/3143699.3143700

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85040708685

VL - Part F133135

SP - 189

EP - 194

BT - Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet and Modern Society, IMS 2017

PB - Association for Computing Machinery

T2 - 2017 International Conference on Internet and Modern Society, IMS 2017

Y2 - 21 June 2017 through 23 June 2017

ER -

ID: 13941371