Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Research › peer-review
Social Networks and Public Policy: Place for Public Dialogue? / Neverov, Kirill; Budko, Diana.
Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet and Modern Society, IMS 2017. Vol. Part F133135 Association for Computing Machinery, 2017. p. 189-194.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Research › peer-review
}
TY - GEN
T1 - Social Networks and Public Policy: Place for Public Dialogue?
AU - Neverov, Kirill
AU - Budko, Diana
N1 - Conference code: XX
PY - 2017/6/21
Y1 - 2017/6/21
N2 - Wide use of Internet on the territory of the Russian Federation and, in particular, Web 2.0 technology development, promote the expansion of the number of Internet users among Russian citizens. Most of them have personal profiles in social networks (e.g. VKontakte, Facebook, Instagram) and make the audience of numerous public groups (or “publics”), virtual communities of different thematic focuses. Groups allow users to share political information and discuss burning issues. It is noteworthy that social networks users could act in various ways: create their own content or retransmit ideas of the others by making reposts. The study examined two types of virtual communities of well-known Russian network “VKontakte”: 1) pages of official authorities; 2) communities for discussion of politics (the five most popular). Content (including comments and discussions) and personal profiles of the most active participants (150 units at all) were studied. The study conducted through N. Fairclough’s interpretation of critical discourse-analysis found that: 1) the main focus of pages of official authorities is spreading of official information and monitoring in the society that allows authorities to respond quickly on critical situations, while public have an opportunity to convey demands to officials; 2) social networks act as a place or forum for public dialogue on political issues and allow ordinary citizens not just “chill out”, but also create an illusion of possibility for each person to influence policy; 3) activity in virtual political communities does not correlate with quantity of the reposts from these communities to users’ personal profiles; moreover, it does not correlate with users’ positioning as an active participant of political discussions in front of his or her followers.
AB - Wide use of Internet on the territory of the Russian Federation and, in particular, Web 2.0 technology development, promote the expansion of the number of Internet users among Russian citizens. Most of them have personal profiles in social networks (e.g. VKontakte, Facebook, Instagram) and make the audience of numerous public groups (or “publics”), virtual communities of different thematic focuses. Groups allow users to share political information and discuss burning issues. It is noteworthy that social networks users could act in various ways: create their own content or retransmit ideas of the others by making reposts. The study examined two types of virtual communities of well-known Russian network “VKontakte”: 1) pages of official authorities; 2) communities for discussion of politics (the five most popular). Content (including comments and discussions) and personal profiles of the most active participants (150 units at all) were studied. The study conducted through N. Fairclough’s interpretation of critical discourse-analysis found that: 1) the main focus of pages of official authorities is spreading of official information and monitoring in the society that allows authorities to respond quickly on critical situations, while public have an opportunity to convey demands to officials; 2) social networks act as a place or forum for public dialogue on political issues and allow ordinary citizens not just “chill out”, but also create an illusion of possibility for each person to influence policy; 3) activity in virtual political communities does not correlate with quantity of the reposts from these communities to users’ personal profiles; moreover, it does not correlate with users’ positioning as an active participant of political discussions in front of his or her followers.
KW - Political Participation
KW - Public Dialogue
KW - Public Policy
KW - Social Networks
KW - Virtual Political Communities
KW - Vkontakte
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040708685&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/3143699.3143700
DO - 10.1145/3143699.3143700
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85040708685
VL - Part F133135
SP - 189
EP - 194
BT - Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet and Modern Society, IMS 2017
PB - Association for Computing Machinery
T2 - 2017 International Conference on Internet and Modern Society, IMS 2017
Y2 - 21 June 2017 through 23 June 2017
ER -
ID: 13941371