Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
Security Games With Unknown Adversarial Strategies. / Garnaev, A.; Baykal-Gursoy, M.; Poor, H.V.
в: IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, Том 46, 2016, стр. 2291 -2299.Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Security Games With Unknown Adversarial Strategies
AU - Garnaev, A.
AU - Baykal-Gursoy, M.
AU - Poor, H.V.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - The security community has witnessed a significant increase in the number of different types of security threats. This situation calls for the design of new techniques that can be incorporated into security protocols to meet these challenges successfully. An important tool for developing new security protocols as well as estimating their effectiveness is game theory. This game theory framework usually involves two players or agents: 1) a protector and 2) an adversary, and two patterns of agent behavior are considered: 1) selfish behavior, where each of the agents wants to maximize his payoff; and 2) leader and follower behavior, where one agent (the leader) expects that the other agent (the follower) will respond to the leader’s strategy. Such an approach assumes that the agents agree on which strategy to apply in advance. In this paper, this strong assumption is relaxed. Namely, the following question is considered: what happens if it is unknown a priori what pattern of behavior the adversary is going to use
AB - The security community has witnessed a significant increase in the number of different types of security threats. This situation calls for the design of new techniques that can be incorporated into security protocols to meet these challenges successfully. An important tool for developing new security protocols as well as estimating their effectiveness is game theory. This game theory framework usually involves two players or agents: 1) a protector and 2) an adversary, and two patterns of agent behavior are considered: 1) selfish behavior, where each of the agents wants to maximize his payoff; and 2) leader and follower behavior, where one agent (the leader) expects that the other agent (the follower) will respond to the leader’s strategy. Such an approach assumes that the agents agree on which strategy to apply in advance. In this paper, this strong assumption is relaxed. Namely, the following question is considered: what happens if it is unknown a priori what pattern of behavior the adversary is going to use
U2 - 10.1109/TCYB.2015.2475243
DO - 10.1109/TCYB.2015.2475243
M3 - Article
VL - 46
SP - 2291
EP - 2299
JO - IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
JF - IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
SN - 2168-2267
ER -
ID: 5813047