Standard

Phonemic Awareness Is a More Important Predictor of Orthographic Processing Than Rapid Serial Naming : Evidence From Russian. / Rakhlin, Natalia; Cardoso-Martins, Cláudia; Grigorenko, Elena L.

в: Scientific Studies of Reading, Том 18, № 6, 01.11.2014, стр. 395-414.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование

Harvard

Rakhlin, N, Cardoso-Martins, C & Grigorenko, EL 2014, 'Phonemic Awareness Is a More Important Predictor of Orthographic Processing Than Rapid Serial Naming: Evidence From Russian', Scientific Studies of Reading, Том. 18, № 6, стр. 395-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2014.918981

APA

Rakhlin, N., Cardoso-Martins, C., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2014). Phonemic Awareness Is a More Important Predictor of Orthographic Processing Than Rapid Serial Naming: Evidence From Russian. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(6), 395-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2014.918981

Vancouver

Rakhlin N, Cardoso-Martins C, Grigorenko EL. Phonemic Awareness Is a More Important Predictor of Orthographic Processing Than Rapid Serial Naming: Evidence From Russian. Scientific Studies of Reading. 2014 Нояб. 1;18(6):395-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2014.918981

Author

Rakhlin, Natalia ; Cardoso-Martins, Cláudia ; Grigorenko, Elena L. / Phonemic Awareness Is a More Important Predictor of Orthographic Processing Than Rapid Serial Naming : Evidence From Russian. в: Scientific Studies of Reading. 2014 ; Том 18, № 6. стр. 395-414.

BibTeX

@article{ede9c4941e7e410bacb38bf6fde63cf7,
title = "Phonemic Awareness Is a More Important Predictor of Orthographic Processing Than Rapid Serial Naming: Evidence From Russian",
abstract = "We studied the relationship between rapid serial naming (RSN) and orthographic processing in Russian, an asymmetrically transparent orthography. Ninety-six students (M age = 13.73) completed tests of word and pseudoword reading fluency, spelling, orthographic choice, phonological choice, phoneme awareness (PA), and RSN. PA was a better predictor of orthographic skills and pseudoword reading accuracy than RSN, which accounted for more variance in word and pseudoword reading fluency. Controlling for pseudoword reading fluency washed out RSN{\textquoteright}s contribution to word reading fluency. These results extend previous findings questioning the role of RSN as an index of orthographic processing skills and support the idea that RSN taps into automaticity/efficiency of processing print-sound mappings.",
author = "Natalia Rakhlin and Cl{\'a}udia Cardoso-Martins and Grigorenko, {Elena L.}",
year = "2014",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10888438.2014.918981",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "395--414",
journal = "Scientific Studies of Reading",
issn = "1088-8438",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Phonemic Awareness Is a More Important Predictor of Orthographic Processing Than Rapid Serial Naming

T2 - Evidence From Russian

AU - Rakhlin, Natalia

AU - Cardoso-Martins, Cláudia

AU - Grigorenko, Elena L.

PY - 2014/11/1

Y1 - 2014/11/1

N2 - We studied the relationship between rapid serial naming (RSN) and orthographic processing in Russian, an asymmetrically transparent orthography. Ninety-six students (M age = 13.73) completed tests of word and pseudoword reading fluency, spelling, orthographic choice, phonological choice, phoneme awareness (PA), and RSN. PA was a better predictor of orthographic skills and pseudoword reading accuracy than RSN, which accounted for more variance in word and pseudoword reading fluency. Controlling for pseudoword reading fluency washed out RSN’s contribution to word reading fluency. These results extend previous findings questioning the role of RSN as an index of orthographic processing skills and support the idea that RSN taps into automaticity/efficiency of processing print-sound mappings.

AB - We studied the relationship between rapid serial naming (RSN) and orthographic processing in Russian, an asymmetrically transparent orthography. Ninety-six students (M age = 13.73) completed tests of word and pseudoword reading fluency, spelling, orthographic choice, phonological choice, phoneme awareness (PA), and RSN. PA was a better predictor of orthographic skills and pseudoword reading accuracy than RSN, which accounted for more variance in word and pseudoword reading fluency. Controlling for pseudoword reading fluency washed out RSN’s contribution to word reading fluency. These results extend previous findings questioning the role of RSN as an index of orthographic processing skills and support the idea that RSN taps into automaticity/efficiency of processing print-sound mappings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907591539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10888438.2014.918981

DO - 10.1080/10888438.2014.918981

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84907591539

VL - 18

SP - 395

EP - 414

JO - Scientific Studies of Reading

JF - Scientific Studies of Reading

SN - 1088-8438

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 62727500