Standard

Improving predictions of technical inefficiency. / Amsler, Christine; James, Robert; Прохоров, Артем Борисович; Schmidt, Peter.

Essays in Honor of Subal Kumbhakar. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., 2024. стр. 309-328 (Advances in Econometrics; Том 46).

Результаты исследований: Публикации в книгах, отчётах, сборниках, трудах конференцийстатья в сборникенаучнаяРецензирование

Harvard

Amsler, C, James, R, Прохоров, АБ & Schmidt, P 2024, Improving predictions of technical inefficiency. в Essays in Honor of Subal Kumbhakar. Advances in Econometrics, Том. 46, Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., стр. 309-328. https://doi.org/10.1108/s0731-905320240000046011

APA

Amsler, C., James, R., Прохоров, А. Б., & Schmidt, P. (2024). Improving predictions of technical inefficiency. в Essays in Honor of Subal Kumbhakar (стр. 309-328). (Advances in Econometrics; Том 46). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.. https://doi.org/10.1108/s0731-905320240000046011

Vancouver

Amsler C, James R, Прохоров АБ, Schmidt P. Improving predictions of technical inefficiency. в Essays in Honor of Subal Kumbhakar. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. 2024. стр. 309-328. (Advances in Econometrics). https://doi.org/10.1108/s0731-905320240000046011

Author

Amsler, Christine ; James, Robert ; Прохоров, Артем Борисович ; Schmidt, Peter. / Improving predictions of technical inefficiency. Essays in Honor of Subal Kumbhakar. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., 2024. стр. 309-328 (Advances in Econometrics).

BibTeX

@inbook{e083f62a754f4310af194ee655c584c0,
title = "Improving predictions of technical inefficiency",
abstract = "The traditional predictor of technical inefficiency proposed by Jondrow, Lovell, Materov, and Schmidt (1982) is a conditional expectation. This chapter explores whether, and by how much, the predictor can be improved by using auxiliary information in the conditioning set. It considers two types of stochastic frontier models. The first type is a panel data model where composed errors from past and future time periods contain information about contemporaneous technical inefficiency. The second type is when the stochastic frontier model is augmented by input ratio equations in which allocative inefficiency is correlated with technical inefficiency. Compared to the standard kernel-smoothing estimator, a newer estimator based on a local linear random forest helps mitigate the curse of dimensionality when the conditioning set is large. Besides numerous simulations, there is an illustrative empirical example.",
keywords = "Stochastic frontier analysis, copulas, inefficiency scores, local random forest, machine learning, nonparametrics, synthetic data",
author = "Christine Amsler and Robert James and Прохоров, {Артем Борисович} and Peter Schmidt",
year = "2024",
month = apr,
day = "5",
doi = "10.1108/s0731-905320240000046011",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-83797-874-8",
series = "Advances in Econometrics",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
pages = "309--328",
booktitle = "Essays in Honor of Subal Kumbhakar",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Improving predictions of technical inefficiency

AU - Amsler, Christine

AU - James, Robert

AU - Прохоров, Артем Борисович

AU - Schmidt, Peter

PY - 2024/4/5

Y1 - 2024/4/5

N2 - The traditional predictor of technical inefficiency proposed by Jondrow, Lovell, Materov, and Schmidt (1982) is a conditional expectation. This chapter explores whether, and by how much, the predictor can be improved by using auxiliary information in the conditioning set. It considers two types of stochastic frontier models. The first type is a panel data model where composed errors from past and future time periods contain information about contemporaneous technical inefficiency. The second type is when the stochastic frontier model is augmented by input ratio equations in which allocative inefficiency is correlated with technical inefficiency. Compared to the standard kernel-smoothing estimator, a newer estimator based on a local linear random forest helps mitigate the curse of dimensionality when the conditioning set is large. Besides numerous simulations, there is an illustrative empirical example.

AB - The traditional predictor of technical inefficiency proposed by Jondrow, Lovell, Materov, and Schmidt (1982) is a conditional expectation. This chapter explores whether, and by how much, the predictor can be improved by using auxiliary information in the conditioning set. It considers two types of stochastic frontier models. The first type is a panel data model where composed errors from past and future time periods contain information about contemporaneous technical inefficiency. The second type is when the stochastic frontier model is augmented by input ratio equations in which allocative inefficiency is correlated with technical inefficiency. Compared to the standard kernel-smoothing estimator, a newer estimator based on a local linear random forest helps mitigate the curse of dimensionality when the conditioning set is large. Besides numerous simulations, there is an illustrative empirical example.

KW - Stochastic frontier analysis

KW - copulas

KW - inefficiency scores

KW - local random forest

KW - machine learning

KW - nonparametrics

KW - synthetic data

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/3e3f3e93-2786-3e21-a011-e5e0abb179e2/

U2 - 10.1108/s0731-905320240000046011

DO - 10.1108/s0731-905320240000046011

M3 - Article in an anthology

SN - 978-1-83797-874-8

T3 - Advances in Econometrics

SP - 309

EP - 328

BT - Essays in Honor of Subal Kumbhakar

PB - Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.

ER -

ID: 128545268