Standard

Immunohistochemical criteria for endometrial receptivity in I/II stage endometriosis IVF-treated patients. / Krylova, Y.; Polyakova, V.; Kvetnoy, I.; Kogan, I.; Dzhemlikhanova, L.; Niauri, D.; Gzgzyan, A.; Ailamazyan, E.

в: Gynecological Endocrinology, Том 32, № S2, 2016, стр. 33-36.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование

Harvard

Krylova, Y, Polyakova, V, Kvetnoy, I, Kogan, I, Dzhemlikhanova, L, Niauri, D, Gzgzyan, A & Ailamazyan, E 2016, 'Immunohistochemical criteria for endometrial receptivity in I/II stage endometriosis IVF-treated patients', Gynecological Endocrinology, Том. 32, № S2, стр. 33-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2016.1232576

APA

Krylova, Y., Polyakova, V., Kvetnoy, I., Kogan, I., Dzhemlikhanova, L., Niauri, D., Gzgzyan, A., & Ailamazyan, E. (2016). Immunohistochemical criteria for endometrial receptivity in I/II stage endometriosis IVF-treated patients. Gynecological Endocrinology, 32(S2), 33-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2016.1232576

Vancouver

Krylova Y, Polyakova V, Kvetnoy I, Kogan I, Dzhemlikhanova L, Niauri D и пр. Immunohistochemical criteria for endometrial receptivity in I/II stage endometriosis IVF-treated patients. Gynecological Endocrinology. 2016;32(S2):33-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2016.1232576

Author

Krylova, Y. ; Polyakova, V. ; Kvetnoy, I. ; Kogan, I. ; Dzhemlikhanova, L. ; Niauri, D. ; Gzgzyan, A. ; Ailamazyan, E. / Immunohistochemical criteria for endometrial receptivity in I/II stage endometriosis IVF-treated patients. в: Gynecological Endocrinology. 2016 ; Том 32, № S2. стр. 33-36.

BibTeX

@article{351186075eee4ba6ba078fb65ab2b9af,
title = "Immunohistochemical criteria for endometrial receptivity in I/II stage endometriosis IVF-treated patients",
abstract = "Background: Implantation failure of in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles is recognized as one of key problems in contemporary reproductive medicine. Implantation itself is a multifactorial process and one can hardly expect to find a single criterion for the endometrium receptivity. Endometrium biopsy still remains the most applicable technique to diagnose abnormalities causing decrease or complete loss of endometrial receptivity. Materials and methods: We have studied 95 endometrial biopsy samples from 45 patient with I/II stage endometriosis and 40 controls from October 2014 to December 2015. Immunohistochemical analysis of key biological molecules participating in implant window formation (LIF, ER, PR, integrin, TGF-β1 and VEGF) was done to assess their predicting value for endometrial receptivity troubles. Results: The discriminant analysis demonstrated that highest information capacity was characteristic for LIF expression percent area, integrin αVβ3 both percent area and optic density in endometrial str",
keywords = "Endometrial receptivity, ER, implantation window, integrin αVβ3, IVF, LIF, PR, TGFβ1, VEGF",
author = "Y. Krylova and V. Polyakova and I. Kvetnoy and I. Kogan and L. Dzhemlikhanova and D. Niauri and A. Gzgzyan and E. Ailamazyan",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/09513590.2016.1232576",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "33--36",
journal = "Gynecological Endocrinology",
issn = "0951-3590",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "S2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Immunohistochemical criteria for endometrial receptivity in I/II stage endometriosis IVF-treated patients

AU - Krylova, Y.

AU - Polyakova, V.

AU - Kvetnoy, I.

AU - Kogan, I.

AU - Dzhemlikhanova, L.

AU - Niauri, D.

AU - Gzgzyan, A.

AU - Ailamazyan, E.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Background: Implantation failure of in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles is recognized as one of key problems in contemporary reproductive medicine. Implantation itself is a multifactorial process and one can hardly expect to find a single criterion for the endometrium receptivity. Endometrium biopsy still remains the most applicable technique to diagnose abnormalities causing decrease or complete loss of endometrial receptivity. Materials and methods: We have studied 95 endometrial biopsy samples from 45 patient with I/II stage endometriosis and 40 controls from October 2014 to December 2015. Immunohistochemical analysis of key biological molecules participating in implant window formation (LIF, ER, PR, integrin, TGF-β1 and VEGF) was done to assess their predicting value for endometrial receptivity troubles. Results: The discriminant analysis demonstrated that highest information capacity was characteristic for LIF expression percent area, integrin αVβ3 both percent area and optic density in endometrial str

AB - Background: Implantation failure of in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles is recognized as one of key problems in contemporary reproductive medicine. Implantation itself is a multifactorial process and one can hardly expect to find a single criterion for the endometrium receptivity. Endometrium biopsy still remains the most applicable technique to diagnose abnormalities causing decrease or complete loss of endometrial receptivity. Materials and methods: We have studied 95 endometrial biopsy samples from 45 patient with I/II stage endometriosis and 40 controls from October 2014 to December 2015. Immunohistochemical analysis of key biological molecules participating in implant window formation (LIF, ER, PR, integrin, TGF-β1 and VEGF) was done to assess their predicting value for endometrial receptivity troubles. Results: The discriminant analysis demonstrated that highest information capacity was characteristic for LIF expression percent area, integrin αVβ3 both percent area and optic density in endometrial str

KW - Endometrial receptivity

KW - ER

KW - implantation window

KW - integrin αVβ3

KW - IVF

KW - LIF

KW - PR

KW - TGFβ1

KW - VEGF

U2 - 10.1080/09513590.2016.1232576

DO - 10.1080/09513590.2016.1232576

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 33

EP - 36

JO - Gynecological Endocrinology

JF - Gynecological Endocrinology

SN - 0951-3590

IS - S2

ER -

ID: 7596577