Standard

Did the Greeks have a worldview? A comparative study of worldview’s genealogy. / Lvov, A.A.

в: Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология , Том 38, № 4, 2022, стр. 500–511.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

Lvov, AA 2022, 'Did the Greeks have a worldview? A comparative study of worldview’s genealogy', Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология , Том. 38, № 4, стр. 500–511.

APA

Lvov, A. A. (2022). Did the Greeks have a worldview? A comparative study of worldview’s genealogy. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология , 38(4), 500–511.

Vancouver

Lvov AA. Did the Greeks have a worldview? A comparative study of worldview’s genealogy. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология . 2022;38(4):500–511.

Author

Lvov, A.A. / Did the Greeks have a worldview? A comparative study of worldview’s genealogy. в: Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология . 2022 ; Том 38, № 4. стр. 500–511.

BibTeX

@article{0f18c1bb75d74c1ab56925864a6daf2b,
title = "Did the Greeks have a worldview? A comparative study of worldview{\textquoteright}s genealogy",
abstract = "The paper scrutinizes a classic passage from Heidegger, in which he argues that Weltanschauung is predominantly a Modern concept and that there was nothing similar in Antiquity. Using a comparative method, I try to demonstrate that it is possible to reconstruct a kind of genealogy of the concept of worldview and to show clues as to its phenomena in Hellenic culture and philosophy and in Early Modern thought. Being not just a linguistic phenomenon, worldview could be analyzed as a metaconcept, articulated in non-Modern contexts and recognized as a “worldview” in terms of Modern philosophy. Considering the ancient Greek notion of αἵρεσις, I show its principle aspects in the sense of “philosophical school”. I hold that it is possible to parallel it with the term Weltanschauung , coined in the German philosophical tradition and possessing its own epistemological features. To prove my argument, I refer to the ideas of Ancient Greek and Hellenic thinkers as well as the most eminent supporters and critics of the concept of Weltanschauung in Modern (primarily German) philosophies. In Conclusions I summarize the main traits I consider commensurate with those of αἵρεσις, which are: 1. Emergence in “turning points” of pivotal historical periods; 2. Articulation of the idea of wholeness and coherence of the Universe (the World); 3. One{\textquoteright}s free-will choice to support a concrete doctrine or point of view to the Universe in connection with its comprehension and one{\textquoteright}s moral principles.",
keywords = "GENEALOGY OF WORLDVIEW, Martin Heidegger, CHRISTIAN HUYGENS, COMPARATIVE PHILOSOPHY, HELLENIC PHILOSOPHY, philosophical anthropology, αἵρεσις, ГЕНЕАЛОГИЯ МИРОВОЗЗРЕНИЯ, Мартин Хайдеггер, КРИСТИАН ГЮЙГЕНС, философская компаративистика, ЭЛЛИНИСТИЧЕСКАЯ ФИЛОСОФИЯ, ФИЛОСОФСКАЯ АНТРОПОЛОГИЯ",
author = "A.A. Lvov",
year = "2022",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "500–511",
journal = " Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология ",
issn = "2542-2278",
publisher = "Издательство Санкт-Петербургского университета",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Did the Greeks have a worldview? A comparative study of worldview’s genealogy

AU - Lvov, A.A.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - The paper scrutinizes a classic passage from Heidegger, in which he argues that Weltanschauung is predominantly a Modern concept and that there was nothing similar in Antiquity. Using a comparative method, I try to demonstrate that it is possible to reconstruct a kind of genealogy of the concept of worldview and to show clues as to its phenomena in Hellenic culture and philosophy and in Early Modern thought. Being not just a linguistic phenomenon, worldview could be analyzed as a metaconcept, articulated in non-Modern contexts and recognized as a “worldview” in terms of Modern philosophy. Considering the ancient Greek notion of αἵρεσις, I show its principle aspects in the sense of “philosophical school”. I hold that it is possible to parallel it with the term Weltanschauung , coined in the German philosophical tradition and possessing its own epistemological features. To prove my argument, I refer to the ideas of Ancient Greek and Hellenic thinkers as well as the most eminent supporters and critics of the concept of Weltanschauung in Modern (primarily German) philosophies. In Conclusions I summarize the main traits I consider commensurate with those of αἵρεσις, which are: 1. Emergence in “turning points” of pivotal historical periods; 2. Articulation of the idea of wholeness and coherence of the Universe (the World); 3. One’s free-will choice to support a concrete doctrine or point of view to the Universe in connection with its comprehension and one’s moral principles.

AB - The paper scrutinizes a classic passage from Heidegger, in which he argues that Weltanschauung is predominantly a Modern concept and that there was nothing similar in Antiquity. Using a comparative method, I try to demonstrate that it is possible to reconstruct a kind of genealogy of the concept of worldview and to show clues as to its phenomena in Hellenic culture and philosophy and in Early Modern thought. Being not just a linguistic phenomenon, worldview could be analyzed as a metaconcept, articulated in non-Modern contexts and recognized as a “worldview” in terms of Modern philosophy. Considering the ancient Greek notion of αἵρεσις, I show its principle aspects in the sense of “philosophical school”. I hold that it is possible to parallel it with the term Weltanschauung , coined in the German philosophical tradition and possessing its own epistemological features. To prove my argument, I refer to the ideas of Ancient Greek and Hellenic thinkers as well as the most eminent supporters and critics of the concept of Weltanschauung in Modern (primarily German) philosophies. In Conclusions I summarize the main traits I consider commensurate with those of αἵρεσις, which are: 1. Emergence in “turning points” of pivotal historical periods; 2. Articulation of the idea of wholeness and coherence of the Universe (the World); 3. One’s free-will choice to support a concrete doctrine or point of view to the Universe in connection with its comprehension and one’s moral principles.

KW - GENEALOGY OF WORLDVIEW

KW - Martin Heidegger

KW - CHRISTIAN HUYGENS

KW - COMPARATIVE PHILOSOPHY

KW - HELLENIC PHILOSOPHY

KW - philosophical anthropology

KW - αἵρεσις

KW - ГЕНЕАЛОГИЯ МИРОВОЗЗРЕНИЯ

KW - Мартин Хайдеггер

KW - КРИСТИАН ГЮЙГЕНС

KW - философская компаративистика

KW - ЭЛЛИНИСТИЧЕСКАЯ ФИЛОСОФИЯ

KW - ФИЛОСОФСКАЯ АНТРОПОЛОГИЯ

UR - https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=50105570

UR - https://philosophyjournal.spbu.ru/article/view/15056

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 500

EP - 511

JO - Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология

JF - Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология

SN - 2542-2278

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 102130325