Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › Обзорная статья › Рецензирование
Concrete vs. Abstract Semantics : From Mental Representations to Functional Brain Mapping. / Mkrtychian, Nadezhda; Blagovechtchenski, Evgeny; Kurmakaeva, Diana; Gnedykh, Daria; Kostromina, Svetlana; Shtyrov, Yury.
в: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Том 13, 267, 02.08.2019.Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › Обзорная статья › Рецензирование
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Concrete vs. Abstract Semantics
T2 - From Mental Representations to Functional Brain Mapping
AU - Mkrtychian, Nadezhda
AU - Blagovechtchenski, Evgeny
AU - Kurmakaeva, Diana
AU - Gnedykh, Daria
AU - Kostromina, Svetlana
AU - Shtyrov, Yury
PY - 2019/8/2
Y1 - 2019/8/2
N2 - The nature of abstract and concrete semantics and differences between them have remained a debated issue in psycholinguistic and cognitive studies for decades. Most of the available behavioral and neuroimaging studies reveal distinctions between these two types of semantics, typically associated with a so-called “concreteness effect.” Many attempts have been made to explain these differences using various approaches, from purely theoretical linguistic and cognitive frameworks to neuroimaging experiments. In this brief overview, we will try to provide a snapshot of these diverse views and relationships between them and highlight the crucial issues preventing this problem from being solved. We will argue that one potentially beneficial way forward is to identify the neural mechanisms underpinning acquisition of the different types of semantics (e.g., by using neurostimulation techniques to establish causal relationships), which may help explain the distinctions found between the processing of concrete and abstract semantics.
AB - The nature of abstract and concrete semantics and differences between them have remained a debated issue in psycholinguistic and cognitive studies for decades. Most of the available behavioral and neuroimaging studies reveal distinctions between these two types of semantics, typically associated with a so-called “concreteness effect.” Many attempts have been made to explain these differences using various approaches, from purely theoretical linguistic and cognitive frameworks to neuroimaging experiments. In this brief overview, we will try to provide a snapshot of these diverse views and relationships between them and highlight the crucial issues preventing this problem from being solved. We will argue that one potentially beneficial way forward is to identify the neural mechanisms underpinning acquisition of the different types of semantics (e.g., by using neurostimulation techniques to establish causal relationships), which may help explain the distinctions found between the processing of concrete and abstract semantics.
KW - brain
KW - concrete and abstract semantics
KW - concreteness effect
KW - functional brain mapping
KW - memory trace
KW - mental representation
KW - psycholinguistics
KW - CONTEXT-AVAILABILITY
KW - COMPREHENSION
KW - METAANALYSIS
KW - MECHANISM
KW - ACQUISITION
KW - MOTOR SYSTEM
KW - CONSOLIDATION
KW - WORD CONCRETENESS
KW - CORTEX
KW - CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072188424&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/concrete-vs-abstract-semantics-mental-representations-functional-brain-mapping
U2 - 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00267
DO - 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00267
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85072188424
VL - 13
JO - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
JF - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
SN - 1662-5161
M1 - 267
ER -
ID: 48311143