Standard

Boris Parygin’ Social Psychology: history and perspectives. / Журавлев, Анатолий Лактионович; Мироненко, Ирина Анатольевна; Сорокин, Павел С.

в: Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, Том 61, № 1, e70006, 01.01.2025.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

Журавлев, АЛ, Мироненко, ИА & Сорокин, ПС 2025, 'Boris Parygin’ Social Psychology: history and perspectives', Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, Том. 61, № 1, e70006. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.70006

APA

Журавлев, А. Л., Мироненко, И. А., & Сорокин, П. С. (2025). Boris Parygin’ Social Psychology: history and perspectives. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 61(1), [e70006]. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.70006

Vancouver

Журавлев АЛ, Мироненко ИА, Сорокин ПС. Boris Parygin’ Social Psychology: history and perspectives. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences. 2025 Янв. 1;61(1). e70006. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.70006

Author

Журавлев, Анатолий Лактионович ; Мироненко, Ирина Анатольевна ; Сорокин, Павел С. / Boris Parygin’ Social Psychology: history and perspectives. в: Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences. 2025 ; Том 61, № 1.

BibTeX

@article{7110a596ee114eddac235866408abe57,
title = "Boris Parygin{\textquoteright} Social Psychology: history and perspectives",
abstract = "International literature on the history of Russian psychology is largely limited to the development of Activity theory and cultural-historical theory. This paper aims to go beyond these limits by introducing a figure little known to an international audience, Boris Parygin, who emerged in the 1960s with his “grand” project for the development of Russian social psychology, significantly different from the Soviet psychology “mainstream,” stemming from Vygotsky, Luria, and Alexei Nikolaevich Leontiev. We demonstrate that Parygin's works belong to a theoretical and methodological tradition of social and humanitarian scholarship that had been developing in Russia since 1870s. This was a broad and inter-disciplinary stream of theoretical and methodological developments, including authors like Berdyaev, Mikhailovsky, and so on, that embraced various disciplines (primarily, psychology, sociology, and philosophy). Despite the fact that Parygin's project did not receive substantial support from the soviet academic community, his ideas concerning personality and emphasis on the importance of individual choice and self-determined activity mediating the impact of social surroundings, have become relevant in the context of current discussions in the international science about individual agency, including debates concerning the transformative potential of the individual upon the social structure under conditions of “morphogenetic society” (M. Archer) or “neo-structuration” (P. Sorokin).",
keywords = "история психологии, социальная психология, психология в России, личность, агентность, Boris Parygin, agency, personality, psychology in Russia, social psychology",
author = "Журавлев, {Анатолий Лактионович} and Мироненко, {Ирина Анатольевна} and Сорокин, {Павел С.}",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1002/jhbs.70006",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
journal = "Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences",
issn = "0022-5061",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Boris Parygin’ Social Psychology: history and perspectives

AU - Журавлев, Анатолий Лактионович

AU - Мироненко, Ирина Анатольевна

AU - Сорокин, Павел С.

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - International literature on the history of Russian psychology is largely limited to the development of Activity theory and cultural-historical theory. This paper aims to go beyond these limits by introducing a figure little known to an international audience, Boris Parygin, who emerged in the 1960s with his “grand” project for the development of Russian social psychology, significantly different from the Soviet psychology “mainstream,” stemming from Vygotsky, Luria, and Alexei Nikolaevich Leontiev. We demonstrate that Parygin's works belong to a theoretical and methodological tradition of social and humanitarian scholarship that had been developing in Russia since 1870s. This was a broad and inter-disciplinary stream of theoretical and methodological developments, including authors like Berdyaev, Mikhailovsky, and so on, that embraced various disciplines (primarily, psychology, sociology, and philosophy). Despite the fact that Parygin's project did not receive substantial support from the soviet academic community, his ideas concerning personality and emphasis on the importance of individual choice and self-determined activity mediating the impact of social surroundings, have become relevant in the context of current discussions in the international science about individual agency, including debates concerning the transformative potential of the individual upon the social structure under conditions of “morphogenetic society” (M. Archer) or “neo-structuration” (P. Sorokin).

AB - International literature on the history of Russian psychology is largely limited to the development of Activity theory and cultural-historical theory. This paper aims to go beyond these limits by introducing a figure little known to an international audience, Boris Parygin, who emerged in the 1960s with his “grand” project for the development of Russian social psychology, significantly different from the Soviet psychology “mainstream,” stemming from Vygotsky, Luria, and Alexei Nikolaevich Leontiev. We demonstrate that Parygin's works belong to a theoretical and methodological tradition of social and humanitarian scholarship that had been developing in Russia since 1870s. This was a broad and inter-disciplinary stream of theoretical and methodological developments, including authors like Berdyaev, Mikhailovsky, and so on, that embraced various disciplines (primarily, psychology, sociology, and philosophy). Despite the fact that Parygin's project did not receive substantial support from the soviet academic community, his ideas concerning personality and emphasis on the importance of individual choice and self-determined activity mediating the impact of social surroundings, have become relevant in the context of current discussions in the international science about individual agency, including debates concerning the transformative potential of the individual upon the social structure under conditions of “morphogenetic society” (M. Archer) or “neo-structuration” (P. Sorokin).

KW - история психологии

KW - социальная психология

KW - психология в России

KW - личность

KW - агентность

KW - Boris Parygin

KW - agency

KW - personality

KW - psychology in Russia

KW - social psychology

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/3e00fd4b-c15b-33a9-b03f-9aa773045e58/

U2 - 10.1002/jhbs.70006

DO - 10.1002/jhbs.70006

M3 - Article

VL - 61

JO - Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences

JF - Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences

SN - 0022-5061

IS - 1

M1 - e70006

ER -

ID: 127563868