Standard

Anthropological turn in worldview studies: Theoretical and practical aspects. / Львов, Александр Александрович.

в: Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология, Том 36, № 2, 2020, стр. 279-290.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

Львов, АА 2020, 'Anthropological turn in worldview studies: Theoretical and practical aspects.', Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология, Том. 36, № 2, стр. 279-290. <http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43881494>

APA

Львов, А. А. (2020). Anthropological turn in worldview studies: Theoretical and practical aspects. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология, 36(2), 279-290. http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43881494

Vancouver

Львов АА. Anthropological turn in worldview studies: Theoretical and practical aspects. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология. 2020;36(2):279-290.

Author

Львов, Александр Александрович. / Anthropological turn in worldview studies: Theoretical and practical aspects. в: Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология. 2020 ; Том 36, № 2. стр. 279-290.

BibTeX

@article{0b4bf07aa6a345e49c55bbea539f7e38,
title = "Anthropological turn in worldview studies: Theoretical and practical aspects.",
abstract = "The concept of worldview is quite ambiguous in modern humanities. Philosophers and scholars insist that there is such a spiritual or cognitive basis of each people, person or language, which finds its expression in the way they behave, think, or speak. Current Russian-speaking colleagues hold that there are different levels or types of worldview (such as mythological, religious, and scientific). All this testifies that the term of worldview lacks preciseness either in Russian and in foreign discourse. The main task of the article is to justify the possibility of a different approach to the study of worldview as a special phenomenon. The question can be raised of what exactly we analyze when dealing with worldview. The author is convinced that it would be better to work with the concept of worldview not as “what”, but rather as “how”. In developing his argument, the author focuses on three main aspects of the issue: (1) the accuracy in describing and conceiving worldview as the issue of philosophy; (2) the his",
keywords = "anthropological turn, Bernhard Groethuysen, Heinrich Gomperz, philosophy as a rigorous science, typology of worldview, worldview, worldview as the issue of philosophy, worldview studies, антропологический поворот, Бернард Грётуйзен, Генрих Гомперц, исследование мировоззрений, мировоззрение, мировоззрение как проблема философии, типология мировоззрений, философия как строгая наука, anthropological turn, Bernhard Groethuysen, Heinrich Gomperz, philosophy as a rigorous science, typology of worldview, worldview, worldview as the issue of philosophy, worldview studies, антропологический поворот, Бернард Грётуйзен, Генрих Гомперц, исследование мировоззрений, мировоззрение, мировоззрение как проблема философии, типология мировоззрений, философия как строгая наука",
author = "Львов, {Александр Александрович}",
year = "2020",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "279--290",
journal = " Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология ",
issn = "2542-2278",
publisher = "Издательство Санкт-Петербургского университета",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anthropological turn in worldview studies: Theoretical and practical aspects.

AU - Львов, Александр Александрович

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - The concept of worldview is quite ambiguous in modern humanities. Philosophers and scholars insist that there is such a spiritual or cognitive basis of each people, person or language, which finds its expression in the way they behave, think, or speak. Current Russian-speaking colleagues hold that there are different levels or types of worldview (such as mythological, religious, and scientific). All this testifies that the term of worldview lacks preciseness either in Russian and in foreign discourse. The main task of the article is to justify the possibility of a different approach to the study of worldview as a special phenomenon. The question can be raised of what exactly we analyze when dealing with worldview. The author is convinced that it would be better to work with the concept of worldview not as “what”, but rather as “how”. In developing his argument, the author focuses on three main aspects of the issue: (1) the accuracy in describing and conceiving worldview as the issue of philosophy; (2) the his

AB - The concept of worldview is quite ambiguous in modern humanities. Philosophers and scholars insist that there is such a spiritual or cognitive basis of each people, person or language, which finds its expression in the way they behave, think, or speak. Current Russian-speaking colleagues hold that there are different levels or types of worldview (such as mythological, religious, and scientific). All this testifies that the term of worldview lacks preciseness either in Russian and in foreign discourse. The main task of the article is to justify the possibility of a different approach to the study of worldview as a special phenomenon. The question can be raised of what exactly we analyze when dealing with worldview. The author is convinced that it would be better to work with the concept of worldview not as “what”, but rather as “how”. In developing his argument, the author focuses on three main aspects of the issue: (1) the accuracy in describing and conceiving worldview as the issue of philosophy; (2) the his

KW - anthropological turn

KW - Bernhard Groethuysen

KW - Heinrich Gomperz

KW - philosophy as a rigorous science

KW - typology of worldview

KW - worldview

KW - worldview as the issue of philosophy

KW - worldview studies

KW - антропологический поворот

KW - Бернард Грётуйзен

KW - Генрих Гомперц

KW - исследование мировоззрений

KW - мировоззрение

KW - мировоззрение как проблема философии

KW - типология мировоззрений

KW - философия как строгая наука

KW - anthropological turn

KW - Bernhard Groethuysen

KW - Heinrich Gomperz

KW - philosophy as a rigorous science

KW - typology of worldview

KW - worldview

KW - worldview as the issue of philosophy

KW - worldview studies

KW - антропологический поворот

KW - Бернард Грётуйзен

KW - Генрих Гомперц

KW - исследование мировоззрений

KW - мировоззрение

KW - мировоззрение как проблема философии

KW - типология мировоззрений

KW - философия как строгая наука

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 279

EP - 290

JO - Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология

JF - Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология

SN - 2542-2278

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 78395722