Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
Anthropological turn in worldview studies: Theoretical and practical aspects. / Львов, Александр Александрович.
в: Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология, Том 36, № 2, 2020, стр. 279-290.Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Anthropological turn in worldview studies: Theoretical and practical aspects.
AU - Львов, Александр Александрович
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - The concept of worldview is quite ambiguous in modern humanities. Philosophers and scholars insist that there is such a spiritual or cognitive basis of each people, person or language, which finds its expression in the way they behave, think, or speak. Current Russian-speaking colleagues hold that there are different levels or types of worldview (such as mythological, religious, and scientific). All this testifies that the term of worldview lacks preciseness either in Russian and in foreign discourse. The main task of the article is to justify the possibility of a different approach to the study of worldview as a special phenomenon. The question can be raised of what exactly we analyze when dealing with worldview. The author is convinced that it would be better to work with the concept of worldview not as “what”, but rather as “how”. In developing his argument, the author focuses on three main aspects of the issue: (1) the accuracy in describing and conceiving worldview as the issue of philosophy; (2) the his
AB - The concept of worldview is quite ambiguous in modern humanities. Philosophers and scholars insist that there is such a spiritual or cognitive basis of each people, person or language, which finds its expression in the way they behave, think, or speak. Current Russian-speaking colleagues hold that there are different levels or types of worldview (such as mythological, religious, and scientific). All this testifies that the term of worldview lacks preciseness either in Russian and in foreign discourse. The main task of the article is to justify the possibility of a different approach to the study of worldview as a special phenomenon. The question can be raised of what exactly we analyze when dealing with worldview. The author is convinced that it would be better to work with the concept of worldview not as “what”, but rather as “how”. In developing his argument, the author focuses on three main aspects of the issue: (1) the accuracy in describing and conceiving worldview as the issue of philosophy; (2) the his
KW - anthropological turn
KW - Bernhard Groethuysen
KW - Heinrich Gomperz
KW - philosophy as a rigorous science
KW - typology of worldview
KW - worldview
KW - worldview as the issue of philosophy
KW - worldview studies
KW - антропологический поворот
KW - Бернард Грётуйзен
KW - Генрих Гомперц
KW - исследование мировоззрений
KW - мировоззрение
KW - мировоззрение как проблема философии
KW - типология мировоззрений
KW - философия как строгая наука
KW - anthropological turn
KW - Bernhard Groethuysen
KW - Heinrich Gomperz
KW - philosophy as a rigorous science
KW - typology of worldview
KW - worldview
KW - worldview as the issue of philosophy
KW - worldview studies
KW - антропологический поворот
KW - Бернард Грётуйзен
KW - Генрих Гомперц
KW - исследование мировоззрений
KW - мировоззрение
KW - мировоззрение как проблема философии
KW - типология мировоззрений
KW - философия как строгая наука
M3 - Article
VL - 36
SP - 279
EP - 290
JO - Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология
JF - Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология
SN - 2542-2278
IS - 2
ER -
ID: 78395722