TY - JOUR

T1 - Acquisitive Prescription of Moveable Property under Russian Law

AU - Rudokvas, Anton D.

AU - Steven, Andrew J.M.

N1 - Acquisitive Prescription of Moveable Property under Russian Law // The Edinburgh Law Review Автор:Rudokvas, Anton D. (Rudokvas, Anton D.) ; Steven, Andrew J. M. (Steven, Andrew J. M.) Том26 Выпуск2 Страница194-218 DOI10.3366/elr.2022.0760 Опубликовано MAY 2022 Дата индексации в Web of Science 2022-06-16 Тип документа Article Адреса 1 St Petersburg State Univ, St Petersburg, Russia 2 Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland Категории/классификация Области исследования Government & Law Темы цитирования 6 Social Sciences 6.110 Law 6.110.1413 Bankruptcy Информация о документе Язык English Идентификационный номер WOS:000796518700002 ISSN 1364-9809 eISSN 1755-1692 Другая информация Номер IDS1H4MR

PY - 2022/5/1

Y1 - 2022/5/1

N2 - Amid the welcome increase in comparative property law scholarship of recent times, particularly in Europe, Russia has been somewhat neglected. This article seeks to provide a start in bringing the rules and policy choices of Russian property law to the attention of an English-language readership. Its subject is acquisitive prescription of moveable property. Here the law as set out in the Russian Civil Code has been the subject of a series of court decisions. The principal analytical instrument chosen to act as a comparator is the Scottish Law Commission’s Report on Prescription and Title to Moveable Property of 2012. The recommendations made in that as yet unimplemented report were significantly influenced by the laws of other jurisdictions, although not Russian law. The article while unsurprisingly discovering commonalities given the shared Roman heritage also finds striking differences. These deserve consideration by legislators in both countries.

AB - Amid the welcome increase in comparative property law scholarship of recent times, particularly in Europe, Russia has been somewhat neglected. This article seeks to provide a start in bringing the rules and policy choices of Russian property law to the attention of an English-language readership. Its subject is acquisitive prescription of moveable property. Here the law as set out in the Russian Civil Code has been the subject of a series of court decisions. The principal analytical instrument chosen to act as a comparator is the Scottish Law Commission’s Report on Prescription and Title to Moveable Property of 2012. The recommendations made in that as yet unimplemented report were significantly influenced by the laws of other jurisdictions, although not Russian law. The article while unsurprisingly discovering commonalities given the shared Roman heritage also finds striking differences. These deserve consideration by legislators in both countries.

KW - приобретательная давность

KW - право собственности

KW - владение

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130520617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/epub/10.3366/elr.2022.0760

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/2c4fbe55-7b4b-36bf-a540-77b303424b8d/

U2 - 10.3366/elr.2022.0760

DO - 10.3366/elr.2022.0760

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85130520617

VL - 26

SP - 194

EP - 218

JO - Edinburgh Law Review

JF - Edinburgh Law Review

SN - 1364-9809

IS - 2

ER -