TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards Understanding the Nature of Theology in the Thought of Frs. S. N. Bulgakov, G. V. Florovsky and Venerable Sophrony Sakharov

AU - Васильев, Глеб Сергеевич

PY - 2024/4/4

Y1 - 2024/4/4

N2 - This paper focuses on what can be said to be the definitive features of the approach to theology by three Russian theologians: Fathers Sergii Bulgakov and Georges Florovsky as well as the Venerable Father Sophrony Sakharov. The article argues that the following common themes characterize the nature of their theology. First, personalism, in other words, the use of the term “person”, which they extensively applied to both God and human and angelic beings. The concept of person is indispensable in the thought of all three theologians. The second common theme is how the authors understood the relationship between theology and experience and what is the significance of religious experience for philosophical theology. Finally, all three theologians agree that when theological truths are expressed in human language the problem of interpretation consequently arises. However, they answer in different ways the question of the number and status of possible theological languages. I conclude that it is St. Sophrony Sakharov who in his life and theology realized Florovsky’s famous call for a neo-patristic synthesis.

AB - This paper focuses on what can be said to be the definitive features of the approach to theology by three Russian theologians: Fathers Sergii Bulgakov and Georges Florovsky as well as the Venerable Father Sophrony Sakharov. The article argues that the following common themes characterize the nature of their theology. First, personalism, in other words, the use of the term “person”, which they extensively applied to both God and human and angelic beings. The concept of person is indispensable in the thought of all three theologians. The second common theme is how the authors understood the relationship between theology and experience and what is the significance of religious experience for philosophical theology. Finally, all three theologians agree that when theological truths are expressed in human language the problem of interpretation consequently arises. However, they answer in different ways the question of the number and status of possible theological languages. I conclude that it is St. Sophrony Sakharov who in his life and theology realized Florovsky’s famous call for a neo-patristic synthesis.

KW - Sergii Bulgakov Saint Sophrony Sakharov Georges Florovsky Personalism Religious experience Theological languages Sophiology Neo-patristic synthesis

KW - Theological languages

KW - Religious experience

KW - Sergii Bulgakov

KW - Neo-patristic synthesis

KW - Personalism

KW - Georges Florovsky

KW - Sophiology

KW - Saint Sophrony Sakharov

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/88b75dae-b6bb-3458-accc-daba25a2c955/

U2 - 10.1007/s11212-024-09633-6

DO - 10.1007/s11212-024-09633-6

M3 - Article

JO - Studies in East European Thought

JF - Studies in East European Thought

SN - 0925-9392

ER -