The Question of Reality in the Context of the Controversy between N. Hartmann's Critical Realism and M. Heidegger' Transcendental Ontology

Standard

The Question of Reality in the Context of the Controversy between N. Hartmann's Critical Realism and M. Heidegger' Transcendental Ontology. / Patkul, A.

In: ARKETE, Vol. Nuova Serie, No. I, 2015, p. 59-74.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

BibTeX

@article{f48eef7141e5480c891909382a45e9b7,

title = "The Question of Reality in the Context of the Controversy between N. Hartmann's Critical Realism and M. Heidegger' Transcendental Ontology",

abstract = "The aim of the article is to compare the notions of reality in N. Hartmann and M. Heidegger ontologies. For reach it the author reconstructs the ideas of ontology in both philosophers with regard to its subject. He discusses the notions of reality in each philosopher and then compares them. The reciprocal critique of these thinkers is also analyzed in the paper. Reality is treated as existence of the entities being independent of human knowledge by Hartmann. But he doesn{\textquoteright}t limit the volume of the notion of reality by the existence of material things. Heidegger treats reality as deficient mode of being constituted in the human understanding. The article{\textquoteright}s author concludes that the Hartmann{\textquoteright}s approach could complete Heidegger{\textquoteright}s doctrine of reality as only mode of being understood by human being.",

keywords = "critical realism, transcendental ontology, being, entity, reality, Dasein, essence, existence, actual being, understanding, intention.",

author = "A. Patkul",

year = "2015",

language = "English",

volume = "Nuova Serie",

pages = "59--74",

journal = "ARKETE",

issn = "1974-1499",

publisher = "MIMESIS",

number = "I",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Question of Reality in the Context of the Controversy between N. Hartmann's Critical Realism and M. Heidegger' Transcendental Ontology

AU - Patkul, A.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The aim of the article is to compare the notions of reality in N. Hartmann and M. Heidegger ontologies. For reach it the author reconstructs the ideas of ontology in both philosophers with regard to its subject. He discusses the notions of reality in each philosopher and then compares them. The reciprocal critique of these thinkers is also analyzed in the paper. Reality is treated as existence of the entities being independent of human knowledge by Hartmann. But he doesn’t limit the volume of the notion of reality by the existence of material things. Heidegger treats reality as deficient mode of being constituted in the human understanding. The article’s author concludes that the Hartmann’s approach could complete Heidegger’s doctrine of reality as only mode of being understood by human being.

AB - The aim of the article is to compare the notions of reality in N. Hartmann and M. Heidegger ontologies. For reach it the author reconstructs the ideas of ontology in both philosophers with regard to its subject. He discusses the notions of reality in each philosopher and then compares them. The reciprocal critique of these thinkers is also analyzed in the paper. Reality is treated as existence of the entities being independent of human knowledge by Hartmann. But he doesn’t limit the volume of the notion of reality by the existence of material things. Heidegger treats reality as deficient mode of being constituted in the human understanding. The article’s author concludes that the Hartmann’s approach could complete Heidegger’s doctrine of reality as only mode of being understood by human being.

KW - critical realism

KW - transcendental ontology

KW - being

KW - entity

KW - reality

KW - Dasein

KW - essence

KW - existence

KW - actual being

KW - understanding

KW - intention.

M3 - Article

VL - Nuova Serie

SP - 59

EP - 74

JO - ARKETE

JF - ARKETE

SN - 1974-1499

IS - I

ER -

ID: 5828583