Standard

The Future of Personality Theory: a Processual Approach. / Костромина, Светлана Николаевна; Гришина, Наталия Владимировна.

In: Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, Vol. 52, No. 2, 2018, p. 296-306.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{fdb96e0a20444fb190f9c13b2f080f90,
title = "The Future of Personality Theory: a Processual Approach",
abstract = "The perpetual discussion of approaches and principles in the study of personality has been one of the notable trends of development of psychological science over many decades. The structural approach, based on the delineation of a person{\textquoteright}s traits and characteristics, made an important contribution to various branches of psychology, but now the scientific community has recognized the limitations of a structural understanding of personality. Its inadequacy becomes particularly obvious in today{\textquoteright}s conditions, when fundamental changes pose a challenge to man{\textquoteright}s ability to respond flexibly to changing conditions of everyday existence, as well as to larger-scale changes. At the beginning of the twenty-first century, it is obvious that there is a need for new ways to understand and describe the personality: Scholars are calling for study of the dynamic personality, of the personality as an open system. At the foundational level, modern personality psychology should incorporate classical ideas about its structure; secondly, it should consider personality in the context of the individual{\textquoteright}s lifetime; and – at the highest level – it should describe personality as the subject of Being. We submit our own description of personality psychology{\textquoteright}s problem field.",
keywords = "Everyday life psychology, Existential approach, Personality psychology, Problem field of personality psychology, Processual approach, Situational and contextual level, Structural approach",
author = "Костромина, {Светлана Николаевна} and Гришина, {Наталия Владимировна}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1007/s12124-018-9420-3",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "296--306",
journal = "Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science",
issn = "1932-4502",
publisher = "Springer Nature",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Future of Personality Theory: a Processual Approach

AU - Костромина, Светлана Николаевна

AU - Гришина, Наталия Владимировна

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The perpetual discussion of approaches and principles in the study of personality has been one of the notable trends of development of psychological science over many decades. The structural approach, based on the delineation of a person’s traits and characteristics, made an important contribution to various branches of psychology, but now the scientific community has recognized the limitations of a structural understanding of personality. Its inadequacy becomes particularly obvious in today’s conditions, when fundamental changes pose a challenge to man’s ability to respond flexibly to changing conditions of everyday existence, as well as to larger-scale changes. At the beginning of the twenty-first century, it is obvious that there is a need for new ways to understand and describe the personality: Scholars are calling for study of the dynamic personality, of the personality as an open system. At the foundational level, modern personality psychology should incorporate classical ideas about its structure; secondly, it should consider personality in the context of the individual’s lifetime; and – at the highest level – it should describe personality as the subject of Being. We submit our own description of personality psychology’s problem field.

AB - The perpetual discussion of approaches and principles in the study of personality has been one of the notable trends of development of psychological science over many decades. The structural approach, based on the delineation of a person’s traits and characteristics, made an important contribution to various branches of psychology, but now the scientific community has recognized the limitations of a structural understanding of personality. Its inadequacy becomes particularly obvious in today’s conditions, when fundamental changes pose a challenge to man’s ability to respond flexibly to changing conditions of everyday existence, as well as to larger-scale changes. At the beginning of the twenty-first century, it is obvious that there is a need for new ways to understand and describe the personality: Scholars are calling for study of the dynamic personality, of the personality as an open system. At the foundational level, modern personality psychology should incorporate classical ideas about its structure; secondly, it should consider personality in the context of the individual’s lifetime; and – at the highest level – it should describe personality as the subject of Being. We submit our own description of personality psychology’s problem field.

KW - Everyday life psychology

KW - Existential approach

KW - Personality psychology

KW - Problem field of personality psychology

KW - Processual approach

KW - Situational and contextual level

KW - Structural approach

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043365029&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12124-018-9420-3

DO - 10.1007/s12124-018-9420-3

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 296

EP - 306

JO - Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science

JF - Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science

SN - 1932-4502

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 18197911