Documents

DOI

The perpetual discussion of approaches and principles in the study of personality has been one of the notable trends of development of psychological science over many decades. The structural approach, based on the delineation of a person’s traits and characteristics, made an important contribution to various branches of psychology, but now the scientific community has recognized the limitations of a structural understanding of personality. Its inadequacy becomes particularly obvious in today’s conditions, when fundamental changes pose a challenge to man’s ability to respond flexibly to changing conditions of everyday existence, as well as to larger-scale changes. At the beginning of the twenty-first century, it is obvious that there is a need for new ways to understand and describe the personality: Scholars are calling for study of the dynamic personality, of the personality as an open system. At the foundational level, modern personality psychology should incorporate classical ideas about its structure; secondly, it should consider personality in the context of the individual’s lifetime; and – at the highest level – it should describe personality as the subject of Being. We submit our own description of personality psychology’s problem field.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)296-306
Number of pages11
JournalIntegrative Psychological and Behavioral Science
Volume52
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018

    Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Cultural Studies
  • Communication
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Philosophy

    Research areas

  • Everyday life psychology, Existential approach, Personality psychology, Problem field of personality psychology, Processual approach, Situational and contextual level, Structural approach

ID: 18197911