Standard

THE FIRST AND THE SECOND INDUSTRIALIZATION: MAIN SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES. / Смирнова, М.М.

In: Colloquium-journal, No. 2-6 (26), 2019, p. 28-29.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{e27bb89065b74c6099c499e9760f6478,
title = "THE FIRST AND THE SECOND INDUSTRIALIZATION: MAIN SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES.",
abstract = "There are two main approaches to industrialization. On the one hand, some scientists (for example, Hobsbawm [2]) treat it as a revolution. On the other, the term “industrial revolution” is criticized by other scientists (for example, Cameron and Neal [1]). Scientists also have doubt about main drivers of industrialization - while Hobsbawm point out cotton industry and colonial expansion (not scientific and technological superiority)[2], Cameron and Neal claim that technical innovation played a huge role in industrialization as a long term process [1]. The first and second industrializations have both similarities and differences. Let{\textquoteright}s lookatitinmoredetail.",
keywords = "first industrialization, innovation, revolution, second industrialization, technology, Вторая индустриализация, инновации, первая индустриализация, революция, технологии, РИНЦ, first industrialization, innovation, revolution, second industrialization, technology, Вторая индустриализация, инновации, первая индустриализация, революция, технологии",
author = "М.М. Смирнова",
note = "Smirnova, M. THE FIRST AND THE SECOND INDUSTRIALIZATION: MAIN SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES / M. Smirnova // Colloquium-journal. -2019. - № 2-6. - P. 28-29.",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
pages = "28--29",
journal = "Colloquium journal",
issn = "2520-2480",
publisher = "Голопристанский районный центр занятости",
number = "2-6 (26)",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - THE FIRST AND THE SECOND INDUSTRIALIZATION: MAIN SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES.

AU - Смирнова, М.М.

N1 - Smirnova, M. THE FIRST AND THE SECOND INDUSTRIALIZATION: MAIN SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES / M. Smirnova // Colloquium-journal. -2019. - № 2-6. - P. 28-29.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - There are two main approaches to industrialization. On the one hand, some scientists (for example, Hobsbawm [2]) treat it as a revolution. On the other, the term “industrial revolution” is criticized by other scientists (for example, Cameron and Neal [1]). Scientists also have doubt about main drivers of industrialization - while Hobsbawm point out cotton industry and colonial expansion (not scientific and technological superiority)[2], Cameron and Neal claim that technical innovation played a huge role in industrialization as a long term process [1]. The first and second industrializations have both similarities and differences. Let’s lookatitinmoredetail.

AB - There are two main approaches to industrialization. On the one hand, some scientists (for example, Hobsbawm [2]) treat it as a revolution. On the other, the term “industrial revolution” is criticized by other scientists (for example, Cameron and Neal [1]). Scientists also have doubt about main drivers of industrialization - while Hobsbawm point out cotton industry and colonial expansion (not scientific and technological superiority)[2], Cameron and Neal claim that technical innovation played a huge role in industrialization as a long term process [1]. The first and second industrializations have both similarities and differences. Let’s lookatitinmoredetail.

KW - first industrialization

KW - innovation

KW - revolution

KW - second industrialization

KW - technology

KW - Вторая индустриализация

KW - инновации

KW - первая индустриализация

KW - революция

KW - технологии

KW - РИНЦ

KW - first industrialization

KW - innovation

KW - revolution

KW - second industrialization

KW - technology

KW - Вторая индустриализация

KW - инновации

KW - первая индустриализация

KW - революция

KW - технологии

M3 - Article

SP - 28

EP - 29

JO - Colloquium journal

JF - Colloquium journal

SN - 2520-2480

IS - 2-6 (26)

ER -

ID: 78601820