Standard

The Comintern, Soviet Diplomacy, and Latin America (1919-1941). / Jeifets, Victor; Jeifets, Lazar.

A New Struggle for Independence in Modern Latin America. Taylor & Francis, 2021. p. 90-122.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Jeifets, V & Jeifets, L 2021, The Comintern, Soviet Diplomacy, and Latin America (1919-1941). in A New Struggle for Independence in Modern Latin America. Taylor & Francis, pp. 90-122. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003042686-4

APA

Jeifets, V., & Jeifets, L. (2021). The Comintern, Soviet Diplomacy, and Latin America (1919-1941). In A New Struggle for Independence in Modern Latin America (pp. 90-122). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003042686-4

Vancouver

Jeifets V, Jeifets L. The Comintern, Soviet Diplomacy, and Latin America (1919-1941). In A New Struggle for Independence in Modern Latin America. Taylor & Francis. 2021. p. 90-122 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003042686-4

Author

Jeifets, Victor ; Jeifets, Lazar. / The Comintern, Soviet Diplomacy, and Latin America (1919-1941). A New Struggle for Independence in Modern Latin America. Taylor & Francis, 2021. pp. 90-122

BibTeX

@inbook{b71604e288b44ea2932eed0b192fe7ed,
title = "The Comintern, Soviet Diplomacy, and Latin America (1919-1941)",
abstract = "The Soviet Foreign Policy towards Latin American countries in the inter-war period and the Communist International{\textquoteright}s activities in those regions were interconnected for years and sometimes it was impossible to separate them. However, there was a slight difference in attitudes taken by Moscow toward Latin American countries, and while the Mexican case was more important for both the USSR and the Comintern from the political, revolutionary and geopolitical perspective, the Argentinean case was, rather, an example of coexistence due to economic needs. For years, this dualism in the Soviet Foreign policy was helping Moscow expand its influence, but was at the same time bringing constant disagreements in its relations with Latin American governments. This chapter studies the international political relations of Mexico, Argentina and Uruguay with the Soviet Union which impacted the political and economic relations for decades.",
author = "Victor Jeifets and Lazar Jeifets",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 Taylor and Francis.",
year = "2021",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9781003042686-4",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780367492571",
pages = "90--122",
booktitle = "A New Struggle for Independence in Modern Latin America",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - The Comintern, Soviet Diplomacy, and Latin America (1919-1941)

AU - Jeifets, Victor

AU - Jeifets, Lazar

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Taylor and Francis.

PY - 2021/1/1

Y1 - 2021/1/1

N2 - The Soviet Foreign Policy towards Latin American countries in the inter-war period and the Communist International’s activities in those regions were interconnected for years and sometimes it was impossible to separate them. However, there was a slight difference in attitudes taken by Moscow toward Latin American countries, and while the Mexican case was more important for both the USSR and the Comintern from the political, revolutionary and geopolitical perspective, the Argentinean case was, rather, an example of coexistence due to economic needs. For years, this dualism in the Soviet Foreign policy was helping Moscow expand its influence, but was at the same time bringing constant disagreements in its relations with Latin American governments. This chapter studies the international political relations of Mexico, Argentina and Uruguay with the Soviet Union which impacted the political and economic relations for decades.

AB - The Soviet Foreign Policy towards Latin American countries in the inter-war period and the Communist International’s activities in those regions were interconnected for years and sometimes it was impossible to separate them. However, there was a slight difference in attitudes taken by Moscow toward Latin American countries, and while the Mexican case was more important for both the USSR and the Comintern from the political, revolutionary and geopolitical perspective, the Argentinean case was, rather, an example of coexistence due to economic needs. For years, this dualism in the Soviet Foreign policy was helping Moscow expand its influence, but was at the same time bringing constant disagreements in its relations with Latin American governments. This chapter studies the international political relations of Mexico, Argentina and Uruguay with the Soviet Union which impacted the political and economic relations for decades.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128994104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781003042686-4

DO - 10.4324/9781003042686-4

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85128994104

SN - 9780367492571

SP - 90

EP - 122

BT - A New Struggle for Independence in Modern Latin America

PB - Taylor & Francis

ER -

ID: 96518696