TY - JOUR

T1 - Textual metaphtonymy as opposed to lexical metaphtonymy

AU - Трофимова, Нэлла Аркадьевна

AU - Песина, Светлана Андреевна

AU - Виноградова, С.А.

AU - Киселева, С.В.

AU - Новиков, Д.Н.

AU - Цыцаркина, Н.Н.

N1 - Pesina S.A., Trofimova N.A., Vinogradova S.A., Kiseleva S.V., Novikov D.N., Tsytsarkina N.N. Textual metaphtonymy as opposed to lexical metaphtonymy // Brazilian Journal of Еducation, Technology and Society. 2024. Vol. 17. №3. Pp. 126-136.

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - In this article, we have proposed to differentiate textual and lexical metaphtonymy as different phenomena. We have considered the phenomenon of metaphtonymy at the level of text, a chain of words the length of a sentence, a phrase, and a separate meaning. We propose to reserve the term “metaphtonymy” for cases when we are talking about the cases of embedding “metonymy into metaphor” and “metaphor into metonymy” at the level of the entire text. An algorithm for determining textual metaphtonymy is presented. It is proposed to distinguish “textual metaph-tonymy” or simply “metaphtonymy” from “reproductive metaphor” and “reproductive meton-ymy” as a two-stage or even three-stage tropic transformation. The latter exist at the level of semantics of polysemous words and are a rather rare phenomenon. The work presents meta-phorically inferential metonymy. Component-invariant analysis showed that with a double mechanism of transfer (transfer by contiguity and comparison) it contains in its semantics a double bundle of components, including the identified lexical invariant.

AB - In this article, we have proposed to differentiate textual and lexical metaphtonymy as different phenomena. We have considered the phenomenon of metaphtonymy at the level of text, a chain of words the length of a sentence, a phrase, and a separate meaning. We propose to reserve the term “metaphtonymy” for cases when we are talking about the cases of embedding “metonymy into metaphor” and “metaphor into metonymy” at the level of the entire text. An algorithm for determining textual metaphtonymy is presented. It is proposed to distinguish “textual metaph-tonymy” or simply “metaphtonymy” from “reproductive metaphor” and “reproductive meton-ymy” as a two-stage or even three-stage tropic transformation. The latter exist at the level of semantics of polysemous words and are a rather rare phenomenon. The work presents meta-phorically inferential metonymy. Component-invariant analysis showed that with a double mechanism of transfer (transfer by contiguity and comparison) it contains in its semantics a double bundle of components, including the identified lexical invariant.

KW - metaphtonymy

KW - reproductive metaphor and metonymy

KW - polysemous word

KW - semantics

KW - lexical invariant

U2 - 10.14571/brajets.v17.nse3.126-136

DO - 10.14571/brajets.v17.nse3.126-136

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 126

EP - 136

JO - Brazilian Journal of Education, Technology and Society

JF - Brazilian Journal of Education, Technology and Society

SN - 2316-9907

IS - 3

ER -