Standard

Technoscience : "Where the danger is, grows the saving power also". / Shipovalova, Lada V.

In: Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, Vol. 57, No. 1, 01.01.2020, p. 45-50.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Harvard

Shipovalova, LV 2020, 'Technoscience: "Where the danger is, grows the saving power also"', Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 45-50. https://doi.org/10.5840/EPS20205715

APA

Shipovalova, L. V. (2020). Technoscience: "Where the danger is, grows the saving power also". Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, 57(1), 45-50. https://doi.org/10.5840/EPS20205715

Vancouver

Shipovalova LV. Technoscience: "Where the danger is, grows the saving power also". Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. 2020 Jan 1;57(1):45-50. https://doi.org/10.5840/EPS20205715

Author

Shipovalova, Lada V. / Technoscience : "Where the danger is, grows the saving power also". In: Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. 2020 ; Vol. 57, No. 1. pp. 45-50.

BibTeX

@article{f26f2b683b2c491cb7e9103e7a3da3b1,
title = "Technoscience: {"}Where the danger is, grows the saving power also{"}",
abstract = "The article is a response to the arguments by O.B. Koshovets and I.E. Frolov on the emergence of {"}technoscience{"}. Technoscience is opposed by the authors to the classical science characterized by the dominance of the technological component of research and capitalization of knowledge. The article focuses on two tasks. The first one supposes an appeal to the historical origins of technoscience and demonstrates significant relationship between technoscience and classical science. The second one involves the disclosure of contemporary negative trends of technoscience as creating conditions for their own overcoming. In conclusion it associates the work on the autonomy of science with the constructive dialogue between scientific and non-scientific knowledge.",
keywords = "Autonomy of science, Problem of demarcation, Scientific-technical revolution, scientific-technical revolution, autonomy of science, problem of demarcation",
author = "Shipovalova, {Lada V.}",
year = "2020",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.5840/EPS20205715",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "45--50",
journal = "ЭПИСТЕМОЛОГИЯ И ФИЛОСОФИЯ НАУКИ",
issn = "1811-833X",
publisher = "Институт философии РАН",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Technoscience

T2 - "Where the danger is, grows the saving power also"

AU - Shipovalova, Lada V.

PY - 2020/1/1

Y1 - 2020/1/1

N2 - The article is a response to the arguments by O.B. Koshovets and I.E. Frolov on the emergence of "technoscience". Technoscience is opposed by the authors to the classical science characterized by the dominance of the technological component of research and capitalization of knowledge. The article focuses on two tasks. The first one supposes an appeal to the historical origins of technoscience and demonstrates significant relationship between technoscience and classical science. The second one involves the disclosure of contemporary negative trends of technoscience as creating conditions for their own overcoming. In conclusion it associates the work on the autonomy of science with the constructive dialogue between scientific and non-scientific knowledge.

AB - The article is a response to the arguments by O.B. Koshovets and I.E. Frolov on the emergence of "technoscience". Technoscience is opposed by the authors to the classical science characterized by the dominance of the technological component of research and capitalization of knowledge. The article focuses on two tasks. The first one supposes an appeal to the historical origins of technoscience and demonstrates significant relationship between technoscience and classical science. The second one involves the disclosure of contemporary negative trends of technoscience as creating conditions for their own overcoming. In conclusion it associates the work on the autonomy of science with the constructive dialogue between scientific and non-scientific knowledge.

KW - Autonomy of science

KW - Problem of demarcation

KW - Scientific-technical revolution

KW - scientific-technical revolution

KW - autonomy of science

KW - problem of demarcation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085379182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/c30dd927-3d96-3ed9-8656-7b890a0f3be1/

U2 - 10.5840/EPS20205715

DO - 10.5840/EPS20205715

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85085379182

VL - 57

SP - 45

EP - 50

JO - ЭПИСТЕМОЛОГИЯ И ФИЛОСОФИЯ НАУКИ

JF - ЭПИСТЕМОЛОГИЯ И ФИЛОСОФИЯ НАУКИ

SN - 1811-833X

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 53868874