Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Sketching as a Technique to Eliciting Information and Cues to Deceit in Interpreter-Based Interviews. / Vrij, Aldert; Leal, Sharon; Fisher, Ronald P.; Mann, Samantha; Dalton, Gary; Jo, Eunkyung; Shaboltas, Alla; Khaleeva, Maria; Granskaya, Juliana; Houston, Kate.
In: Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, Vol. 7, No. 2, 06.2018, p. 303-313.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Sketching as a Technique to Eliciting Information and Cues to Deceit in Interpreter-Based Interviews
AU - Vrij, Aldert
AU - Leal, Sharon
AU - Fisher, Ronald P.
AU - Mann, Samantha
AU - Dalton, Gary
AU - Jo, Eunkyung
AU - Shaboltas, Alla
AU - Khaleeva, Maria
AU - Granskaya, Juliana
AU - Houston, Kate
PY - 2018/6
Y1 - 2018/6
N2 - We tested the effect of sketching while providing a narrative on eliciting information, eliciting cues to deceit, and lie detection in interpreter-absent and interpreter-present interviews. A total of 204 participants from the USA (Hispanic participants only), Russia, and the Republic of Korea were interviewed in their native language by native interviewers or by a British interviewer through an interpreter. Truth-tellers discussed a trip they had made; liars fabricated a story about such a trip. Half of the participants were instructed to sketch while narrating; the other half received no instruction. Sketching resulted in more details provided. It also elicited cues to deceit: complications and new details differentiated truth-tellers from liars in the Sketching-present condition only. Liars and truth-tellers were more correctly classified in the Sketching-present than in the Sketching-absent condition. More complications and more common-knowledge details were reported without than with an interpreter.
AB - We tested the effect of sketching while providing a narrative on eliciting information, eliciting cues to deceit, and lie detection in interpreter-absent and interpreter-present interviews. A total of 204 participants from the USA (Hispanic participants only), Russia, and the Republic of Korea were interviewed in their native language by native interviewers or by a British interviewer through an interpreter. Truth-tellers discussed a trip they had made; liars fabricated a story about such a trip. Half of the participants were instructed to sketch while narrating; the other half received no instruction. Sketching resulted in more details provided. It also elicited cues to deceit: complications and new details differentiated truth-tellers from liars in the Sketching-present condition only. Liars and truth-tellers were more correctly classified in the Sketching-present than in the Sketching-absent condition. More complications and more common-knowledge details were reported without than with an interpreter.
KW - Deception
KW - Drawing
KW - Information gathering
KW - Interpreter
KW - Non-native speakers
KW - NONNATIVE SPEAKERS
KW - LIES
KW - DECEPTION
KW - RETRIEVAL
KW - DRAWINGS
KW - LIARS
KW - MEMORY
KW - WITNESSES
KW - MODEL STATEMENT
KW - FACILITATE
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035131758&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/sketching-technique-eliciting-information-cues-deceit-interpreterbased-interviews
U2 - 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.11.001
DO - 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.11.001
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85035131758
VL - 7
SP - 303
EP - 313
JO - Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
JF - Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
SN - 2211-3681
IS - 2
ER -
ID: 13394712