We tested the effect of sketching while providing a narrative on eliciting information, eliciting cues to deceit, and lie detection in interpreter-absent and interpreter-present interviews. A total of 204 participants from the USA (Hispanic participants only), Russia, and the Republic of Korea were interviewed in their native language by native interviewers or by a British interviewer through an interpreter. Truth-tellers discussed a trip they had made; liars fabricated a story about such a trip. Half of the participants were instructed to sketch while narrating; the other half received no instruction. Sketching resulted in more details provided. It also elicited cues to deceit: complications and new details differentiated truth-tellers from liars in the Sketching-present condition only. Liars and truth-tellers were more correctly classified in the Sketching-present than in the Sketching-absent condition. More complications and more common-knowledge details were reported without than with an interpreter.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)303-313
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2018

    Research areas

  • Deception, Drawing, Information gathering, Interpreter, Non-native speakers, NONNATIVE SPEAKERS, LIES, DECEPTION, RETRIEVAL, DRAWINGS, LIARS, MEMORY, WITNESSES, MODEL STATEMENT, FACILITATE

    Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

ID: 13394712