Standard

Prosodic phrasing in Russian spontaneous and read speech: evidence from large speech corpora. / Kachkovskaia, Tatiana ; Skrelin, Pavel .

Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Tokyo, Japan. Vol. 2020-May 2020. p. 166-170 (Proceedings of the International Conference on Speech Prosody).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Kachkovskaia, T & Skrelin, P 2020, Prosodic phrasing in Russian spontaneous and read speech: evidence from large speech corpora. in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Tokyo, Japan. vol. 2020-May, Proceedings of the International Conference on Speech Prosody, pp. 166-170, 10th International Conference on Speech Prosody 2020, Токио, Japan, 25/05/20. https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2020-34

APA

Kachkovskaia, T., & Skrelin, P. (2020). Prosodic phrasing in Russian spontaneous and read speech: evidence from large speech corpora. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Tokyo, Japan (Vol. 2020-May, pp. 166-170). (Proceedings of the International Conference on Speech Prosody). https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2020-34

Vancouver

Kachkovskaia T, Skrelin P. Prosodic phrasing in Russian spontaneous and read speech: evidence from large speech corpora. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Tokyo, Japan. Vol. 2020-May. 2020. p. 166-170. (Proceedings of the International Conference on Speech Prosody). https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2020-34

Author

Kachkovskaia, Tatiana ; Skrelin, Pavel . / Prosodic phrasing in Russian spontaneous and read speech: evidence from large speech corpora. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Tokyo, Japan. Vol. 2020-May 2020. pp. 166-170 (Proceedings of the International Conference on Speech Prosody).

BibTeX

@inproceedings{97a7ff3613294a1a9339e5350e9f52dd,
title = "Prosodic phrasing in Russian spontaneous and read speech: evidence from large speech corpora",
abstract = "This paper explores the differences between spontaneous and read speech in terms of prosodic phrasing. For both types of speech material we analysed the following data: IP duration (in seconds) and IP length (in clitic groups); distribution of melodic types in the material; silent pause duration; the ratio between the number of silent pauses and the number of IP boundaries. The measurements were made over 30 hours of read and 15 hours of spontaneous Russian speech. Our data have revealed the following differences in prosodic phrasing between the two types of speech material. In spontaneous speech we observe (1) shorter IPs, (2) more IPs with non-final nucleus, (3) a different frequency distribution of intonation models. Silent pause duration and the ratio between the number of silent pauses and the number of IP boundaries are highly variable across speakers.",
keywords = "Prosody, spontaneous speech, read speech, intonational phrase, pause, Read speech, Pause, Intonational phrase, Spontaneous speech",
author = "Tatiana Kachkovskaia and Pavel Skrelin",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.21437/SpeechProsody.2020-34",
language = "English",
volume = "2020-May",
series = "Proceedings of the International Conference on Speech Prosody",
pages = "166--170",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Tokyo, Japan",
note = "null ; Conference date: 25-05-2020 Through 28-05-2020",
url = "https://sp2020.jpn.org/",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Prosodic phrasing in Russian spontaneous and read speech: evidence from large speech corpora

AU - Kachkovskaia, Tatiana

AU - Skrelin, Pavel

N1 - Conference code: 10

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - This paper explores the differences between spontaneous and read speech in terms of prosodic phrasing. For both types of speech material we analysed the following data: IP duration (in seconds) and IP length (in clitic groups); distribution of melodic types in the material; silent pause duration; the ratio between the number of silent pauses and the number of IP boundaries. The measurements were made over 30 hours of read and 15 hours of spontaneous Russian speech. Our data have revealed the following differences in prosodic phrasing between the two types of speech material. In spontaneous speech we observe (1) shorter IPs, (2) more IPs with non-final nucleus, (3) a different frequency distribution of intonation models. Silent pause duration and the ratio between the number of silent pauses and the number of IP boundaries are highly variable across speakers.

AB - This paper explores the differences between spontaneous and read speech in terms of prosodic phrasing. For both types of speech material we analysed the following data: IP duration (in seconds) and IP length (in clitic groups); distribution of melodic types in the material; silent pause duration; the ratio between the number of silent pauses and the number of IP boundaries. The measurements were made over 30 hours of read and 15 hours of spontaneous Russian speech. Our data have revealed the following differences in prosodic phrasing between the two types of speech material. In spontaneous speech we observe (1) shorter IPs, (2) more IPs with non-final nucleus, (3) a different frequency distribution of intonation models. Silent pause duration and the ratio between the number of silent pauses and the number of IP boundaries are highly variable across speakers.

KW - Prosody

KW - spontaneous speech

KW - read speech

KW - intonational phrase

KW - pause

KW - Read speech

KW - Pause

KW - Intonational phrase

KW - Spontaneous speech

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85093888491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2020-34

DO - 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2020-34

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 2020-May

T3 - Proceedings of the International Conference on Speech Prosody

SP - 166

EP - 170

BT - Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Tokyo, Japan

Y2 - 25 May 2020 through 28 May 2020

ER -

ID: 53562985