This paper explores the differences between spontaneous and read speech in terms of prosodic phrasing. For both types of speech material we analysed the following data: IP duration (in seconds) and IP length (in clitic groups); distribution of melodic types in the material; silent pause duration; the ratio between the number of silent pauses and the number of IP boundaries. The measurements were made over 30 hours of read and 15 hours of spontaneous Russian speech. Our data have revealed the following differences in prosodic phrasing between the two types of speech material. In spontaneous speech we observe (1) shorter IPs, (2) more IPs with non-final nucleus, (3) a different frequency distribution of intonation models. Silent pause duration and the ratio between the number of silent pauses and the number of IP boundaries are highly variable across speakers.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 10th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Tokyo, Japan
Pages166-170
Number of pages5
Volume2020-May
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020
Event10th International Conference on Speech Prosody 2020 - Токио, Japan
Duration: 25 May 202028 May 2020
Conference number: 10
https://sp2020.jpn.org/

Publication series

NameProceedings of the International Conference on Speech Prosody
ISSN (Print)2333-2042

Conference

Conference10th International Conference on Speech Prosody 2020
Country/TerritoryJapan
CityТокио
Period25/05/2028/05/20
Internet address

    Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

    Research areas

  • Prosody, spontaneous speech, read speech, intonational phrase, pause, Read speech, Pause, Intonational phrase, Spontaneous speech

ID: 53562985