Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Nonlinear Analysis of Charge-Pump Phase-Locked Loop : The Hold-In and Pull-In Ranges. / Kuznetsov, Nikolay; Matveev, Alexey; Yuldashev, Marat; Yuldashev, Renat.
In: IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, Vol. 68, No. 10, 10.2021, p. 4049-4061.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Nonlinear Analysis of Charge-Pump Phase-Locked Loop
T2 - The Hold-In and Pull-In Ranges
AU - Kuznetsov, Nikolay
AU - Matveev, Alexey
AU - Yuldashev, Marat
AU - Yuldashev, Renat
N1 - Funding Information: Manuscript received February 27, 2021; revised June 12, 2021; accepted July 14, 2021. Date of publication August 10, 2021; date of current version September 30, 2021. This work was supported in part by the Russian Science Foundation under Project 19-41-02002 and in part by the Leading Scientific Schools of Russia Project under Grant NSh-2624.2020.1 (publication fee). This article was recommended by Associate Editor J. Juillard. (Corresponding author: Nikolay Kuznetsov.) Nikolay Kuznetsov is with the Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint-Petersburg State University, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia, also with the Faculty of Information Technology, University of Jyväskylä, 40014 Jyväskylä, Finland, and also with the Institute for Problems in Mechanical Engineering, Russian Academy of Science, 199178 Saint Petersburg, Russia (e-mail: nkuznetsov239@gmail.com). Publisher Copyright: © 2004-2012 IEEE.
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - In this paper a fairly complete mathematical model of CP-PLL, which reliable enough to serve as a tool for credible analysis of dynamical properties of these circuits, is studied. We refine relevant mathematical definitions of the hold-in and pull-in ranges related to the local and global stability. Stability analysis of the steady state for the charge-pump phase locked loop is non-trivial: straight-forward linearization of available CP-PLL models may lead to incorrect conclusions, because the system is not smooth near the steady state and may experience overload. In this work necessary details for local stability analysis are presented and the hold-in range is computed. An upper estimate of the pull-in range is obtained via the analysis of limit cycles. The study provided an answer to Gardner's conjecture on the similarity of transient responses of CP-PLL and equivalent classical PLL and to conjectures on the infinite pull-in range of CP-PLL with proportionally-integrating filter.
AB - In this paper a fairly complete mathematical model of CP-PLL, which reliable enough to serve as a tool for credible analysis of dynamical properties of these circuits, is studied. We refine relevant mathematical definitions of the hold-in and pull-in ranges related to the local and global stability. Stability analysis of the steady state for the charge-pump phase locked loop is non-trivial: straight-forward linearization of available CP-PLL models may lead to incorrect conclusions, because the system is not smooth near the steady state and may experience overload. In this work necessary details for local stability analysis are presented and the hold-in range is computed. An upper estimate of the pull-in range is obtained via the analysis of limit cycles. The study provided an answer to Gardner's conjecture on the similarity of transient responses of CP-PLL and equivalent classical PLL and to conjectures on the infinite pull-in range of CP-PLL with proportionally-integrating filter.
KW - Charge-pump PLL
KW - CP-PLL
KW - Gardner conjecture
KW - hidden oscillations
KW - phase-locked loops
KW - VCO overload
KW - Charge pumps
KW - LIMITATIONS
KW - Phase frequency detectors
KW - MODEL
KW - SIMULATION
KW - Phase locked loops
KW - CIRCUITS
KW - HIDDEN OSCILLATIONS
KW - PLL
KW - Voltage-controlled oscillators
KW - STABILITY ANALYSIS
KW - Stability criteria
KW - Circuit stability
KW - Mathematical model
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116235622&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/71ae389c-8fc0-3645-8325-ac3805f2194b/
U2 - 10.1109/TCSI.2021.3101529
DO - 10.1109/TCSI.2021.3101529
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85116235622
VL - 68
SP - 4049
EP - 4061
JO - IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems
JF - IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems
SN - 1549-8328
IS - 10
ER -
ID: 86614221