Standard

Deus et Natura у Спинозы в контексте воззрений Маймонида и Джикатилы на деяния Бога по созиданию «Природы». / Тантлевский, И. Р.

In: ВОПРОСЫ ФИЛОСОФИИ, No. 3, 31.03.2016, p. 170-185.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Harvard

Тантлевский, ИР 2016, 'Deus et Natura у Спинозы в контексте воззрений Маймонида и Джикатилы на деяния Бога по созиданию «Природы»', ВОПРОСЫ ФИЛОСОФИИ, no. 3, pp. 170-185.

APA

Тантлевский, И. Р. (2016). Deus et Natura у Спинозы в контексте воззрений Маймонида и Джикатилы на деяния Бога по созиданию «Природы». ВОПРОСЫ ФИЛОСОФИИ, (3), 170-185.

Vancouver

Тантлевский ИР. Deus et Natura у Спинозы в контексте воззрений Маймонида и Джикатилы на деяния Бога по созиданию «Природы». ВОПРОСЫ ФИЛОСОФИИ. 2016 Mar 31;(3):170-185.

Author

Тантлевский, И. Р. / Deus et Natura у Спинозы в контексте воззрений Маймонида и Джикатилы на деяния Бога по созиданию «Природы». In: ВОПРОСЫ ФИЛОСОФИИ. 2016 ; No. 3. pp. 170-185.

BibTeX

@article{2d26646108944f998c71086539c4eb6a,
title = "Deus et Natura у Спинозы в контексте воззрений Маймонида и Джикатилы на деяния Бога по созиданию «Природы»",
abstract = "The author considers Spinoza's natural philosophy views in the context of some creationistic and cosmological conceptions of medieval Jewish thinkers, primarily, those of Maimonides and Gikatilla. At this, special attention is given, on the one hand, to revealing of homonymous notions' relative contextual differentiations, and, on the other, - of relevant designations' correlations. E.g., the author endeavors to reveal the following correspondence in Spinoza's system: The 'Elohim (God as the {"}Aggregate of Powers{"}) - Deus, sive omnia Dei attributa - Natura naturans. In many Jewish creationistic and emanational-emergent teachings, as opposed to Spinozan monistic and panentheistic system, {"}the Nature{"} (hat-Teba') is considered to be {"}the Imprint{"} (NB: The root taba' means to {"}imprint{"}, to {"}mint{"}) {"}imprinted{"} by the 'Elohim, and this aspect can be interpreted as a way to emphasize the Eternal Being's transcendence in connection to the Universe.",
keywords = "'elohim-god, Deus, Gikatilla, Maimonides, Natura, Spinoza, Tetragrammaton, The Hebrew bible, The medieval peripatetism",
author = "Тантлевский, {И. Р.}",
note = "Funding Information: * Исследование выполнено за счет фанта Российского научного фонда (проект N15 - 18 - 00062); Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет. This research was carried out thanks to the funding of the Russian Science Foundation (project N15 - 18 - 00062); Saint-Petersburg State University. Copyright: Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2016",
month = mar,
day = "31",
language = "русский",
pages = "170--185",
journal = "ВОПРОСЫ ФИЛОСОФИИ",
issn = "0042-8744",
publisher = "Международная книга",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deus et Natura у Спинозы в контексте воззрений Маймонида и Джикатилы на деяния Бога по созиданию «Природы»

AU - Тантлевский, И. Р.

N1 - Funding Information: * Исследование выполнено за счет фанта Российского научного фонда (проект N15 - 18 - 00062); Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет. This research was carried out thanks to the funding of the Russian Science Foundation (project N15 - 18 - 00062); Saint-Petersburg State University. Copyright: Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2016/3/31

Y1 - 2016/3/31

N2 - The author considers Spinoza's natural philosophy views in the context of some creationistic and cosmological conceptions of medieval Jewish thinkers, primarily, those of Maimonides and Gikatilla. At this, special attention is given, on the one hand, to revealing of homonymous notions' relative contextual differentiations, and, on the other, - of relevant designations' correlations. E.g., the author endeavors to reveal the following correspondence in Spinoza's system: The 'Elohim (God as the "Aggregate of Powers") - Deus, sive omnia Dei attributa - Natura naturans. In many Jewish creationistic and emanational-emergent teachings, as opposed to Spinozan monistic and panentheistic system, "the Nature" (hat-Teba') is considered to be "the Imprint" (NB: The root taba' means to "imprint", to "mint") "imprinted" by the 'Elohim, and this aspect can be interpreted as a way to emphasize the Eternal Being's transcendence in connection to the Universe.

AB - The author considers Spinoza's natural philosophy views in the context of some creationistic and cosmological conceptions of medieval Jewish thinkers, primarily, those of Maimonides and Gikatilla. At this, special attention is given, on the one hand, to revealing of homonymous notions' relative contextual differentiations, and, on the other, - of relevant designations' correlations. E.g., the author endeavors to reveal the following correspondence in Spinoza's system: The 'Elohim (God as the "Aggregate of Powers") - Deus, sive omnia Dei attributa - Natura naturans. In many Jewish creationistic and emanational-emergent teachings, as opposed to Spinozan monistic and panentheistic system, "the Nature" (hat-Teba') is considered to be "the Imprint" (NB: The root taba' means to "imprint", to "mint") "imprinted" by the 'Elohim, and this aspect can be interpreted as a way to emphasize the Eternal Being's transcendence in connection to the Universe.

KW - 'elohim-god

KW - Deus

KW - Gikatilla

KW - Maimonides

KW - Natura

KW - Spinoza

KW - Tetragrammaton

KW - The Hebrew bible

KW - The medieval peripatetism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978965587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - статья

SP - 170

EP - 185

JO - ВОПРОСЫ ФИЛОСОФИИ

JF - ВОПРОСЫ ФИЛОСОФИИ

SN - 0042-8744

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 7561676