Standard

Correcting source and receiver scaling for virtual source imaging and monitoring. / Bakulin, Andrey; Alexandrov, Dmitry; Saragiotis, Christos; Al Ramadan, Abdullah; Kashtan, Boris.

In: Geophysics, Vol. 83, No. 3, 01.05.2018, p. Q15-Q24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bakulin, Andrey ; Alexandrov, Dmitry ; Saragiotis, Christos ; Al Ramadan, Abdullah ; Kashtan, Boris. / Correcting source and receiver scaling for virtual source imaging and monitoring. In: Geophysics. 2018 ; Vol. 83, No. 3. pp. Q15-Q24.

BibTeX

@article{4e496ac1709c47ff966feca98ebeed2d,
title = "Correcting source and receiver scaling for virtual source imaging and monitoring",
abstract = "Virtual source redatuming is a data-driven interferometric approach that relies on constructive and destructive interference, and as a result it is quite sensitive to input seismic trace amplitudes. Land surveys are prone to amplitude changes that are unrelated to subsurface geology (source/receiver coupling, etc.). We have determined that such variations may be particularly damaging to construct a virtual-source signal for imaging and seismic monitoring applications, and they need to be correctly compensated before satisfactory images, repeatability, and proper relative amplitudes are achieved. We examine two methods to correct for these variations: a redatuming approach based on multidimensional deconvolution and multisurvey surface-consistent (SC) scaling. Using synthetic data, we discover that the first approach can only balance time-dependent variations between repeat surveys, e.g., compensate for variable shot scaling. In contrast, a multisurvey SC approach can compensate for shot and receiver scaling within each survey and among the surveys. As a result, it eliminates redatuming artifacts, brings repeat surveys to a common amplitude level, while preserving relative amplitudes required for quantitative interpretation of 4D amplitude differences. Applying an SC approach to a land time-lapse field data set with buried receivers from Saudi Arabia, we additionally conclude that separate SC scaling of early arrivals and deep reflections may produce better image and repeatability. This is likely due to the significantly different frequency content of early arrivals and deep reflections.",
keywords = "Crosscorrelation, Deconvolution, Interferometry, Monitoring, Surface consistent, MULTIDIMENSIONAL DECONVOLUTION, SEISMIC INTERFEROMETRY",
author = "Andrey Bakulin and Dmitry Alexandrov and Christos Saragiotis and {Al Ramadan}, Abdullah and Boris Kashtan",
year = "2018",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1190/geo2017-0163.1",
language = "English",
volume = "83",
pages = "Q15--Q24",
journal = "Geophysics",
issn = "0016-8033",
publisher = "Society of Exploration Geophysicists",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correcting source and receiver scaling for virtual source imaging and monitoring

AU - Bakulin, Andrey

AU - Alexandrov, Dmitry

AU - Saragiotis, Christos

AU - Al Ramadan, Abdullah

AU - Kashtan, Boris

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Virtual source redatuming is a data-driven interferometric approach that relies on constructive and destructive interference, and as a result it is quite sensitive to input seismic trace amplitudes. Land surveys are prone to amplitude changes that are unrelated to subsurface geology (source/receiver coupling, etc.). We have determined that such variations may be particularly damaging to construct a virtual-source signal for imaging and seismic monitoring applications, and they need to be correctly compensated before satisfactory images, repeatability, and proper relative amplitudes are achieved. We examine two methods to correct for these variations: a redatuming approach based on multidimensional deconvolution and multisurvey surface-consistent (SC) scaling. Using synthetic data, we discover that the first approach can only balance time-dependent variations between repeat surveys, e.g., compensate for variable shot scaling. In contrast, a multisurvey SC approach can compensate for shot and receiver scaling within each survey and among the surveys. As a result, it eliminates redatuming artifacts, brings repeat surveys to a common amplitude level, while preserving relative amplitudes required for quantitative interpretation of 4D amplitude differences. Applying an SC approach to a land time-lapse field data set with buried receivers from Saudi Arabia, we additionally conclude that separate SC scaling of early arrivals and deep reflections may produce better image and repeatability. This is likely due to the significantly different frequency content of early arrivals and deep reflections.

AB - Virtual source redatuming is a data-driven interferometric approach that relies on constructive and destructive interference, and as a result it is quite sensitive to input seismic trace amplitudes. Land surveys are prone to amplitude changes that are unrelated to subsurface geology (source/receiver coupling, etc.). We have determined that such variations may be particularly damaging to construct a virtual-source signal for imaging and seismic monitoring applications, and they need to be correctly compensated before satisfactory images, repeatability, and proper relative amplitudes are achieved. We examine two methods to correct for these variations: a redatuming approach based on multidimensional deconvolution and multisurvey surface-consistent (SC) scaling. Using synthetic data, we discover that the first approach can only balance time-dependent variations between repeat surveys, e.g., compensate for variable shot scaling. In contrast, a multisurvey SC approach can compensate for shot and receiver scaling within each survey and among the surveys. As a result, it eliminates redatuming artifacts, brings repeat surveys to a common amplitude level, while preserving relative amplitudes required for quantitative interpretation of 4D amplitude differences. Applying an SC approach to a land time-lapse field data set with buried receivers from Saudi Arabia, we additionally conclude that separate SC scaling of early arrivals and deep reflections may produce better image and repeatability. This is likely due to the significantly different frequency content of early arrivals and deep reflections.

KW - Crosscorrelation

KW - Deconvolution

KW - Interferometry

KW - Monitoring

KW - Surface consistent

KW - MULTIDIMENSIONAL DECONVOLUTION

KW - SEISMIC INTERFEROMETRY

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042419075&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://library.seg.org/doi/10.1190/geo2017-0163.1

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/correcting-source-receiver-scaling-virtual-source-imaging-monitoring

U2 - 10.1190/geo2017-0163.1

DO - 10.1190/geo2017-0163.1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85042419075

VL - 83

SP - Q15-Q24

JO - Geophysics

JF - Geophysics

SN - 0016-8033

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 36259627