Standard

“Concept Synthesis” test for intelligence research: Qualitative analysis and conceptual commentaries. / Shcherbakova, O. V. ; Makarova, D. N. ; Nikiforova, E. A. .

In: Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Серия 16. Психология. Педагогика, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2017, p. 128-136.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Harvard

Shcherbakova, OV, Makarova, DN & Nikiforova, EA 2017, '“Concept Synthesis” test for intelligence research: Qualitative analysis and conceptual commentaries', Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Серия 16. Психология. Педагогика, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 128-136.

APA

Shcherbakova, O. V., Makarova, D. N., & Nikiforova, E. A. (2017). “Concept Synthesis” test for intelligence research: Qualitative analysis and conceptual commentaries. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Серия 16. Психология. Педагогика, 7(2), 128-136.

Vancouver

Shcherbakova OV, Makarova DN, Nikiforova EA. “Concept Synthesis” test for intelligence research: Qualitative analysis and conceptual commentaries. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Серия 16. Психология. Педагогика. 2017;7(2):128-136.

Author

Shcherbakova, O. V. ; Makarova, D. N. ; Nikiforova, E. A. . / “Concept Synthesis” test for intelligence research: Qualitative analysis and conceptual commentaries. In: Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Серия 16. Психология. Педагогика. 2017 ; Vol. 7, No. 2. pp. 128-136.

BibTeX

@article{aa55c50d5acc402b951c1aac9bf488b8,
title = "“Concept Synthesis” test for intelligence research: Qualitative analysis and conceptual commentaries",
abstract = "“Concept Synthesis” test (by M.A.Kholodnaya) was suggested within an ontological approach to intelligence studies as an alternative tool for measuring intellectual abilities. The aim of this paper is to summarize our experience of using this test as well as to provide some conceptual commentaries on the original criteria developed for rating the answers. We compiled a database of 924 answers for “Concept Synthesis” test, collected from 2013 to 2015 in three different studies (all together, 104 participants) and rated in accordance with the original criteria. All the answers underwent a thorough qualitative analysis and were re-rated independently by three experts. The updated criteria for assessing the answers were suggested as a result of this work. We also provide conceptual commentaries on more than 40 particular answers and discuss the most common technical issues emerging while using “Concept Synthesis” test. Refs 19. Table 1.",
keywords = "Intelligence, INTELLIGENCE MEASUREMENT, conceptual abilities, {"}CONCEPT SYNTHESIS{"} TEST",
author = "Shcherbakova, {O. V.} and Makarova, {D. N.} and Nikiforova, {E. A.}",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "128--136",
journal = "Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Психология ",
issn = "2658-3607",
publisher = "Издательство Санкт-Петербургского университета",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - “Concept Synthesis” test for intelligence research: Qualitative analysis and conceptual commentaries

AU - Shcherbakova, O. V.

AU - Makarova, D. N.

AU - Nikiforova, E. A.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - “Concept Synthesis” test (by M.A.Kholodnaya) was suggested within an ontological approach to intelligence studies as an alternative tool for measuring intellectual abilities. The aim of this paper is to summarize our experience of using this test as well as to provide some conceptual commentaries on the original criteria developed for rating the answers. We compiled a database of 924 answers for “Concept Synthesis” test, collected from 2013 to 2015 in three different studies (all together, 104 participants) and rated in accordance with the original criteria. All the answers underwent a thorough qualitative analysis and were re-rated independently by three experts. The updated criteria for assessing the answers were suggested as a result of this work. We also provide conceptual commentaries on more than 40 particular answers and discuss the most common technical issues emerging while using “Concept Synthesis” test. Refs 19. Table 1.

AB - “Concept Synthesis” test (by M.A.Kholodnaya) was suggested within an ontological approach to intelligence studies as an alternative tool for measuring intellectual abilities. The aim of this paper is to summarize our experience of using this test as well as to provide some conceptual commentaries on the original criteria developed for rating the answers. We compiled a database of 924 answers for “Concept Synthesis” test, collected from 2013 to 2015 in three different studies (all together, 104 participants) and rated in accordance with the original criteria. All the answers underwent a thorough qualitative analysis and were re-rated independently by three experts. The updated criteria for assessing the answers were suggested as a result of this work. We also provide conceptual commentaries on more than 40 particular answers and discuss the most common technical issues emerging while using “Concept Synthesis” test. Refs 19. Table 1.

KW - Intelligence

KW - INTELLIGENCE MEASUREMENT

KW - conceptual abilities

KW - "CONCEPT SYNTHESIS" TEST

UR - https://psyjournal.spbu.ru/article/view/3586/3887

UR - https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30008309

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 128

EP - 136

JO - Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Психология

JF - Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Психология

SN - 2658-3607

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 14715156