ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ КРЕАТИВНОСТИ В РОССИИ (2000-2017 ГГ.). ЧАСТЬ II. МЕТОДИЧЕСКИЕ РЕКОМЕНДАЦИИ ДЛЯ ИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЕЙ

Standard

ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ КРЕАТИВНОСТИ В РОССИИ (2000-2017 ГГ.). ЧАСТЬ II. МЕТОДИЧЕСКИЕ РЕКОМЕНДАЦИИ ДЛЯ ИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЕЙ. / Miroshnik, K. G.; Shcherbakova, O. V.

In: Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2020, p. 32-42.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

BibTeX

@article{72d09f73194e40cf82be4e5af6948b3e,

title = "ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ КРЕАТИВНОСТИ В РОССИИ (2000-2017 ГГ.). ЧАСТЬ II. МЕТОДИЧЕСКИЕ РЕКОМЕНДАЦИИ ДЛЯ ИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЕЙ",

abstract = "This article is concerned with analysis and discussion of empirical results of the study of the most common methodological practices in the Russian field of creativity research. In the present study, methodological practices are defined as research methodology, statistical data processing, and description of results in scientific papers. Based on the obtained results, we composed a list of recommendations aimed at improv-ing current methodological practices. These recommendations stress the necessity of: 1) compliance with the current requirements for the processing and interpretation of the results on divergent thinking tests and the organization of the testing procedure; 2) using more than one divergent thinking task in case the latter is chosen as a target measure; 3) avoiding the tendency to interpret scores on Mednick{\textquoteright}s test as characteristic of (verbal) creativity; 4) providing data on the reliability of scores derived from psychometric methods; 5) reporting sample size as well as sample{\textquoteright}s major demographic characteristics, such as age and sex; 6) correct application of statistical tests; 7) reporting the magnitude of a test statistic, the exact p-value, and confidence intervals and/ or effect size.",

keywords = "Creativity, Creativity research, Methodological practices, Methodological recommendations, Methodology, Statistical analysis, DEFINITION, methodological practices, creativity research, methodological recommendations, WALLACH, RELIABILITY, PSYCHOLOGY, SAMPLE, ACHIEVEMENT, DIVERGENT THINKING TESTS, creativity, statistical analysis, VALIDITY, methodology, TORRANCE TESTS",

author = "Miroshnik, {K. G.} and Shcherbakova, {O. V.}",

year = "2020",

doi = "10.31857/S020595920009324-2",

language = "English",

volume = "41",

pages = "32--42",

journal = "Психологический журнал",

issn = "0205-9592",

publisher = "Международная книга",

number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ КРЕАТИВНОСТИ В РОССИИ (2000-2017 ГГ.). ЧАСТЬ II. МЕТОДИЧЕСКИЕ РЕКОМЕНДАЦИИ ДЛЯ ИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЕЙ

AU - Miroshnik, K. G.

AU - Shcherbakova, O. V.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - This article is concerned with analysis and discussion of empirical results of the study of the most common methodological practices in the Russian field of creativity research. In the present study, methodological practices are defined as research methodology, statistical data processing, and description of results in scientific papers. Based on the obtained results, we composed a list of recommendations aimed at improv-ing current methodological practices. These recommendations stress the necessity of: 1) compliance with the current requirements for the processing and interpretation of the results on divergent thinking tests and the organization of the testing procedure; 2) using more than one divergent thinking task in case the latter is chosen as a target measure; 3) avoiding the tendency to interpret scores on Mednick’s test as characteristic of (verbal) creativity; 4) providing data on the reliability of scores derived from psychometric methods; 5) reporting sample size as well as sample’s major demographic characteristics, such as age and sex; 6) correct application of statistical tests; 7) reporting the magnitude of a test statistic, the exact p-value, and confidence intervals and/ or effect size.

AB - This article is concerned with analysis and discussion of empirical results of the study of the most common methodological practices in the Russian field of creativity research. In the present study, methodological practices are defined as research methodology, statistical data processing, and description of results in scientific papers. Based on the obtained results, we composed a list of recommendations aimed at improv-ing current methodological practices. These recommendations stress the necessity of: 1) compliance with the current requirements for the processing and interpretation of the results on divergent thinking tests and the organization of the testing procedure; 2) using more than one divergent thinking task in case the latter is chosen as a target measure; 3) avoiding the tendency to interpret scores on Mednick’s test as characteristic of (verbal) creativity; 4) providing data on the reliability of scores derived from psychometric methods; 5) reporting sample size as well as sample’s major demographic characteristics, such as age and sex; 6) correct application of statistical tests; 7) reporting the magnitude of a test statistic, the exact p-value, and confidence intervals and/ or effect size.

KW - Creativity

KW - Creativity research

KW - Methodological practices

KW - Methodological recommendations

KW - Methodology

KW - Statistical analysis

KW - DEFINITION

KW - methodological practices

KW - creativity research

KW - methodological recommendations

KW - WALLACH

KW - RELIABILITY

KW - PSYCHOLOGY

KW - SAMPLE

KW - ACHIEVEMENT

KW - DIVERGENT THINKING TESTS

KW - creativity

KW - statistical analysis

KW - VALIDITY

KW - methodology

KW - TORRANCE TESTS

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090386523&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/86d0b81c-4e71-3688-9e06-d5e720080c0b/

U2 - 10.31857/S020595920009324-2

DO - 10.31857/S020595920009324-2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85090386523

VL - 41

SP - 32

EP - 42

JO - Психологический журнал

JF - Психологический журнал

SN - 0205-9592

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 69940345