Standard

ОТСУТСТВИЕ АНТИДОПИНГОВОГО ОБУЧЕНИЯ СПОРТСМЕНА КАК СУБЪЕКТИВНЫЙ ЭЛЕМЕНТ НЕЗНАЧИТЕЛЬНОЙ ВИНЫ ИЛИ ХАЛАТНОСТИ ПРИ НАРУШЕНИИ АНТИДОПИНГОВЫХ ПРАВИЛ. / Васильев, Илья Александрович.

In: АРБИТРАЖНЫЙ И ГРАЖДАНСКИЙ ПРОЦЕСС, No. 1, 25.02.2026, p. 8-11.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Harvard

Васильев, ИА 2026, 'ОТСУТСТВИЕ АНТИДОПИНГОВОГО ОБУЧЕНИЯ СПОРТСМЕНА КАК СУБЪЕКТИВНЫЙ ЭЛЕМЕНТ НЕЗНАЧИТЕЛЬНОЙ ВИНЫ ИЛИ ХАЛАТНОСТИ ПРИ НАРУШЕНИИ АНТИДОПИНГОВЫХ ПРАВИЛ', АРБИТРАЖНЫЙ И ГРАЖДАНСКИЙ ПРОЦЕСС, no. 1, pp. 8-11. https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2026-1-8-11

APA

Васильев, И. А. (2026). ОТСУТСТВИЕ АНТИДОПИНГОВОГО ОБУЧЕНИЯ СПОРТСМЕНА КАК СУБЪЕКТИВНЫЙ ЭЛЕМЕНТ НЕЗНАЧИТЕЛЬНОЙ ВИНЫ ИЛИ ХАЛАТНОСТИ ПРИ НАРУШЕНИИ АНТИДОПИНГОВЫХ ПРАВИЛ. АРБИТРАЖНЫЙ И ГРАЖДАНСКИЙ ПРОЦЕСС, (1), 8-11. https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2026-1-8-11

Vancouver

Васильев ИА. ОТСУТСТВИЕ АНТИДОПИНГОВОГО ОБУЧЕНИЯ СПОРТСМЕНА КАК СУБЪЕКТИВНЫЙ ЭЛЕМЕНТ НЕЗНАЧИТЕЛЬНОЙ ВИНЫ ИЛИ ХАЛАТНОСТИ ПРИ НАРУШЕНИИ АНТИДОПИНГОВЫХ ПРАВИЛ. АРБИТРАЖНЫЙ И ГРАЖДАНСКИЙ ПРОЦЕСС. 2026 Feb 25;(1):8-11. https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2026-1-8-11

Author

Васильев, Илья Александрович. / ОТСУТСТВИЕ АНТИДОПИНГОВОГО ОБУЧЕНИЯ СПОРТСМЕНА КАК СУБЪЕКТИВНЫЙ ЭЛЕМЕНТ НЕЗНАЧИТЕЛЬНОЙ ВИНЫ ИЛИ ХАЛАТНОСТИ ПРИ НАРУШЕНИИ АНТИДОПИНГОВЫХ ПРАВИЛ. In: АРБИТРАЖНЫЙ И ГРАЖДАНСКИЙ ПРОЦЕСС. 2026 ; No. 1. pp. 8-11.

BibTeX

@article{fb24a6cad35d41d493ff237df6f88cca,
title = "ОТСУТСТВИЕ АНТИДОПИНГОВОГО ОБУЧЕНИЯ СПОРТСМЕНА КАК СУБЪЕКТИВНЫЙ ЭЛЕМЕНТ НЕЗНАЧИТЕЛЬНОЙ ВИНЫ ИЛИ ХАЛАТНОСТИ ПРИ НАРУШЕНИИ АНТИДОПИНГОВЫХ ПРАВИЛ",
abstract = "The lack of anti-doping education in the practice of jurisdictional bodies and arbitration courts is considered as a subjective element influencing the determination of the sportsman{\textquoteright}s degree of nonsignificant fault or negligence. After analyzing the decisions of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), we came to the conclusion that the independent nature of this circumstance, as it does not require a logical link with the athlete{\textquoteright}s experience in competitions, remains questionable today. This is partly influenced by the prevalence of anti-doping training as a responsibility of international and national anti-doping organizations. Another reason is the strictness of the WADA World Anti-Doping Code, which requires athletes to exercise a duty of utmost caution, which implies an active position in the study of anti-doping rules.",
author = "Васильев, {Илья Александрович}",
year = "2026",
month = feb,
day = "25",
doi = "10.18572/1812-383x-2026-1-8-11",
language = "русский",
pages = "8--11",
journal = "АРБИТРАЖНЫЙ И ГРАЖДАНСКИЙ ПРОЦЕСС",
issn = "1812-383X",
publisher = "Издательская группа «Юрист»",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - ОТСУТСТВИЕ АНТИДОПИНГОВОГО ОБУЧЕНИЯ СПОРТСМЕНА КАК СУБЪЕКТИВНЫЙ ЭЛЕМЕНТ НЕЗНАЧИТЕЛЬНОЙ ВИНЫ ИЛИ ХАЛАТНОСТИ ПРИ НАРУШЕНИИ АНТИДОПИНГОВЫХ ПРАВИЛ

AU - Васильев, Илья Александрович

PY - 2026/2/25

Y1 - 2026/2/25

N2 - The lack of anti-doping education in the practice of jurisdictional bodies and arbitration courts is considered as a subjective element influencing the determination of the sportsman’s degree of nonsignificant fault or negligence. After analyzing the decisions of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), we came to the conclusion that the independent nature of this circumstance, as it does not require a logical link with the athlete’s experience in competitions, remains questionable today. This is partly influenced by the prevalence of anti-doping training as a responsibility of international and national anti-doping organizations. Another reason is the strictness of the WADA World Anti-Doping Code, which requires athletes to exercise a duty of utmost caution, which implies an active position in the study of anti-doping rules.

AB - The lack of anti-doping education in the practice of jurisdictional bodies and arbitration courts is considered as a subjective element influencing the determination of the sportsman’s degree of nonsignificant fault or negligence. After analyzing the decisions of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), we came to the conclusion that the independent nature of this circumstance, as it does not require a logical link with the athlete’s experience in competitions, remains questionable today. This is partly influenced by the prevalence of anti-doping training as a responsibility of international and national anti-doping organizations. Another reason is the strictness of the WADA World Anti-Doping Code, which requires athletes to exercise a duty of utmost caution, which implies an active position in the study of anti-doping rules.

UR - https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=88822139

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/baf8b3ff-7578-3187-bc91-4d891018c4c4/

U2 - 10.18572/1812-383x-2026-1-8-11

DO - 10.18572/1812-383x-2026-1-8-11

M3 - статья

SP - 8

EP - 11

JO - АРБИТРАЖНЫЙ И ГРАЖДАНСКИЙ ПРОЦЕСС

JF - АРБИТРАЖНЫЙ И ГРАЖДАНСКИЙ ПРОЦЕСС

SN - 1812-383X

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 149389495