The article provides a comparative analysis of the Resolution of Plenum of the Supreme Court of 26.11.2019 No. 48 and its Resolution No. 64, provides an analysis of the key points of the Resolution No. 48 that are textually new in relation to the now repealed Resolution No. 64 and describes their practical value.
Original language
Russian
Pages (from-to)
34-41
Journal
ТЕНДЕНЦИИ РАЗВИТИЯ НАУКИ И ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ
Issue number
60-5
State
Published - 2020
Research areas
compensation for damage by another person, continuing crime, CRIMINAL liability, INSURANCE premiums, limitations for criminal prosecution, other documents, возмещения ущерба иным лицом, длящееся преступление, иные документы, срок давности привлечения к уголовной ответственности, страховые взносы, уголовная ответственность
