Standard

Искусственный интеллект в политическом анализе: записки умеренного оптимиста. / Попова, Ольга Валентиновна.

In: ВЕСТНИК РОССИЙСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА ДРУЖБЫ НАРОДОВ. СЕРИЯ: ПОЛИТОЛОГИЯ, Vol. 28, No. 1, 08.04.2026, p. 149-168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Попова, ОВ 2026, 'Искусственный интеллект в политическом анализе: записки умеренного оптимиста', ВЕСТНИК РОССИЙСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА ДРУЖБЫ НАРОДОВ. СЕРИЯ: ПОЛИТОЛОГИЯ, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 149-168. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2026-28-1-149-168

APA

Попова, О. В. (2026). Искусственный интеллект в политическом анализе: записки умеренного оптимиста. ВЕСТНИК РОССИЙСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА ДРУЖБЫ НАРОДОВ. СЕРИЯ: ПОЛИТОЛОГИЯ, 28(1), 149-168. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2026-28-1-149-168

Vancouver

Попова ОВ. Искусственный интеллект в политическом анализе: записки умеренного оптимиста. ВЕСТНИК РОССИЙСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА ДРУЖБЫ НАРОДОВ. СЕРИЯ: ПОЛИТОЛОГИЯ. 2026 Apr 8;28(1):149-168. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2026-28-1-149-168

Author

Попова, Ольга Валентиновна. / Искусственный интеллект в политическом анализе: записки умеренного оптимиста. In: ВЕСТНИК РОССИЙСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА ДРУЖБЫ НАРОДОВ. СЕРИЯ: ПОЛИТОЛОГИЯ. 2026 ; Vol. 28, No. 1. pp. 149-168.

BibTeX

@article{db746a1f36784d4f971cd1f436eb4872,
title = "Искусственный интеллект в политическом анализе: записки умеренного оптимиста",
abstract = "In modern political science research, increased attention is being paid to the analysis of the possibilities and limitations of using artificial intelligence (AI). The evolution of AI methods from neural networks to generative artificial intelligence (AGI) models is considered. The author systematizes the main AI tools for political analysis: machine learning, deep learning, neural networks of various architectures, natural language processing (NLP). An overview of software platforms for collecting, processing and visualizing political data is presented. Key thematic areas of AI application are highlighted: electoral research, political discourse analysis, international relations and geopolitics studies, public administration. The capabilities of the NLP method for sentiment analysis, topic modeling and extraction of main ideas from political texts are outlined. The author not only emphasizes the advantages of using AI in political analysis (automation, reducing research time, new forecasting capabilities), but also shows the risks and limitations: technical vulnerabilities of models, the phenomenon of “AI hallucinations”, bias of algorithms, problems of transparency and the ability to interpret results, ethical and legal challenges. The position of “cautious optimism” is substantiated, which assumes the effective use of AI while maintaining systematic analysis, norms of critical reflection, ethical principles and maintaining the professional competencies of a political scientist. The conclusion is drawn about the need for the responsible use of AI in political research, mastery of modern digital analytics tools and the mandatory retention of skills in traditional methods of studying the sphere of politics.",
author = "Попова, {Ольга Валентиновна}",
year = "2026",
month = apr,
day = "8",
doi = "10.22363/2313-1438-2026-28-1-149-168",
language = "русский",
volume = "28",
pages = "149--168",
journal = "ВЕСТНИК РОССИЙСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА ДРУЖБЫ НАРОДОВ. СЕРИЯ: ПОЛИТОЛОГИЯ",
issn = "2313-1438",
publisher = "Российский университет дружбы народов",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Искусственный интеллект в политическом анализе: записки умеренного оптимиста

AU - Попова, Ольга Валентиновна

PY - 2026/4/8

Y1 - 2026/4/8

N2 - In modern political science research, increased attention is being paid to the analysis of the possibilities and limitations of using artificial intelligence (AI). The evolution of AI methods from neural networks to generative artificial intelligence (AGI) models is considered. The author systematizes the main AI tools for political analysis: machine learning, deep learning, neural networks of various architectures, natural language processing (NLP). An overview of software platforms for collecting, processing and visualizing political data is presented. Key thematic areas of AI application are highlighted: electoral research, political discourse analysis, international relations and geopolitics studies, public administration. The capabilities of the NLP method for sentiment analysis, topic modeling and extraction of main ideas from political texts are outlined. The author not only emphasizes the advantages of using AI in political analysis (automation, reducing research time, new forecasting capabilities), but also shows the risks and limitations: technical vulnerabilities of models, the phenomenon of “AI hallucinations”, bias of algorithms, problems of transparency and the ability to interpret results, ethical and legal challenges. The position of “cautious optimism” is substantiated, which assumes the effective use of AI while maintaining systematic analysis, norms of critical reflection, ethical principles and maintaining the professional competencies of a political scientist. The conclusion is drawn about the need for the responsible use of AI in political research, mastery of modern digital analytics tools and the mandatory retention of skills in traditional methods of studying the sphere of politics.

AB - In modern political science research, increased attention is being paid to the analysis of the possibilities and limitations of using artificial intelligence (AI). The evolution of AI methods from neural networks to generative artificial intelligence (AGI) models is considered. The author systematizes the main AI tools for political analysis: machine learning, deep learning, neural networks of various architectures, natural language processing (NLP). An overview of software platforms for collecting, processing and visualizing political data is presented. Key thematic areas of AI application are highlighted: electoral research, political discourse analysis, international relations and geopolitics studies, public administration. The capabilities of the NLP method for sentiment analysis, topic modeling and extraction of main ideas from political texts are outlined. The author not only emphasizes the advantages of using AI in political analysis (automation, reducing research time, new forecasting capabilities), but also shows the risks and limitations: technical vulnerabilities of models, the phenomenon of “AI hallucinations”, bias of algorithms, problems of transparency and the ability to interpret results, ethical and legal challenges. The position of “cautious optimism” is substantiated, which assumes the effective use of AI while maintaining systematic analysis, norms of critical reflection, ethical principles and maintaining the professional competencies of a political scientist. The conclusion is drawn about the need for the responsible use of AI in political research, mastery of modern digital analytics tools and the mandatory retention of skills in traditional methods of studying the sphere of politics.

UR - http://elibrary.ru/NNLGEY

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/68d99445-d3a3-34c8-ab28-a0539e72d76f/

U2 - 10.22363/2313-1438-2026-28-1-149-168

DO - 10.22363/2313-1438-2026-28-1-149-168

M3 - статья

VL - 28

SP - 149

EP - 168

JO - ВЕСТНИК РОССИЙСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА ДРУЖБЫ НАРОДОВ. СЕРИЯ: ПОЛИТОЛОГИЯ

JF - ВЕСТНИК РОССИЙСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА ДРУЖБЫ НАРОДОВ. СЕРИЯ: ПОЛИТОЛОГИЯ

SN - 2313-1438

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 151117168