Standard

РЕЗУЛЬТАТИВНОСТЬ, ЭКСПЕРИЕНЦИАЛЬНОСТЬ, ИНКЛЮЗИВНОСТЬ, ИММЕДИАТНОСТЬ: ЧЕМ ОПРЕДЕЛЯЕТСЯ ЗНАЧЕНИЕ ПЕРФЕКТА? / Горбова, Е.В.

In: ACTA LINGUISTICA PETROPOLITANA. ТРУДЫ ИНСТИТУТА ЛИНГВИСТИЧЕСКИХ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2016, p. 39-66.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Harvard

Горбова, ЕВ 2016, 'РЕЗУЛЬТАТИВНОСТЬ, ЭКСПЕРИЕНЦИАЛЬНОСТЬ, ИНКЛЮЗИВНОСТЬ, ИММЕДИАТНОСТЬ: ЧЕМ ОПРЕДЕЛЯЕТСЯ ЗНАЧЕНИЕ ПЕРФЕКТА?', ACTA LINGUISTICA PETROPOLITANA. ТРУДЫ ИНСТИТУТА ЛИНГВИСТИЧЕСКИХ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 39-66. <https://alp.iling.spb.ru/static/alp_XII_2.pd>

APA

Горбова, Е. В. (2016). РЕЗУЛЬТАТИВНОСТЬ, ЭКСПЕРИЕНЦИАЛЬНОСТЬ, ИНКЛЮЗИВНОСТЬ, ИММЕДИАТНОСТЬ: ЧЕМ ОПРЕДЕЛЯЕТСЯ ЗНАЧЕНИЕ ПЕРФЕКТА? ACTA LINGUISTICA PETROPOLITANA. ТРУДЫ ИНСТИТУТА ЛИНГВИСТИЧЕСКИХ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ, 12(2), 39-66. https://alp.iling.spb.ru/static/alp_XII_2.pd

Vancouver

Горбова ЕВ. РЕЗУЛЬТАТИВНОСТЬ, ЭКСПЕРИЕНЦИАЛЬНОСТЬ, ИНКЛЮЗИВНОСТЬ, ИММЕДИАТНОСТЬ: ЧЕМ ОПРЕДЕЛЯЕТСЯ ЗНАЧЕНИЕ ПЕРФЕКТА? ACTA LINGUISTICA PETROPOLITANA. ТРУДЫ ИНСТИТУТА ЛИНГВИСТИЧЕСКИХ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ. 2016;12(2):39-66.

Author

Горбова, Е.В. / РЕЗУЛЬТАТИВНОСТЬ, ЭКСПЕРИЕНЦИАЛЬНОСТЬ, ИНКЛЮЗИВНОСТЬ, ИММЕДИАТНОСТЬ: ЧЕМ ОПРЕДЕЛЯЕТСЯ ЗНАЧЕНИЕ ПЕРФЕКТА?. In: ACTA LINGUISTICA PETROPOLITANA. ТРУДЫ ИНСТИТУТА ЛИНГВИСТИЧЕСКИХ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ. 2016 ; Vol. 12, No. 2. pp. 39-66.

BibTeX

@article{68278b8f45124dbca0e153f94b3ae384,
title = "РЕЗУЛЬТАТИВНОСТЬ, ЭКСПЕРИЕНЦИАЛЬНОСТЬ, ИНКЛЮЗИВНОСТЬ, ИММЕДИАТНОСТЬ: ЧЕМ ОПРЕДЕЛЯЕТСЯ ЗНАЧЕНИЕ ПЕРФЕКТА?",
abstract = "The article discusses the semantic structure of perfect as a crosslinguistic grammatical category with reference to the corresponding grammeme in Spanish. The discussion is focused on the semantic scope of perfect with a list of four types of perfect, their mutual relationship, including their (non-)reducibility to an invariant. The study of language material gathered in two (micro)corpora leads to a conclusion that the traditional typological list of types of perfect is not fully applicable to the Spanish Perfect. Besides, the results of the analysis give grounds to consider “current relevance” to be the invariant meaning of the grammeme of perfect (or at least of Spanish Perfect).",
keywords = "perfect, Spanish, typological approach, aspectualgrammeme, semantics of perfect, types of perfect, perfect of persistentsituation, perfect of recent past, experiential perfect, perfect of result, currentrelevance, invariant meaning",
author = "Е.В. Горбова",
year = "2016",
language = "русский",
volume = "12",
pages = "39--66",
journal = "Acta Linguistica Petropolitana",
issn = "2306-5737",
publisher = "Институт лингвистических исследований РАН",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - РЕЗУЛЬТАТИВНОСТЬ, ЭКСПЕРИЕНЦИАЛЬНОСТЬ, ИНКЛЮЗИВНОСТЬ, ИММЕДИАТНОСТЬ: ЧЕМ ОПРЕДЕЛЯЕТСЯ ЗНАЧЕНИЕ ПЕРФЕКТА?

AU - Горбова, Е.В.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The article discusses the semantic structure of perfect as a crosslinguistic grammatical category with reference to the corresponding grammeme in Spanish. The discussion is focused on the semantic scope of perfect with a list of four types of perfect, their mutual relationship, including their (non-)reducibility to an invariant. The study of language material gathered in two (micro)corpora leads to a conclusion that the traditional typological list of types of perfect is not fully applicable to the Spanish Perfect. Besides, the results of the analysis give grounds to consider “current relevance” to be the invariant meaning of the grammeme of perfect (or at least of Spanish Perfect).

AB - The article discusses the semantic structure of perfect as a crosslinguistic grammatical category with reference to the corresponding grammeme in Spanish. The discussion is focused on the semantic scope of perfect with a list of four types of perfect, their mutual relationship, including their (non-)reducibility to an invariant. The study of language material gathered in two (micro)corpora leads to a conclusion that the traditional typological list of types of perfect is not fully applicable to the Spanish Perfect. Besides, the results of the analysis give grounds to consider “current relevance” to be the invariant meaning of the grammeme of perfect (or at least of Spanish Perfect).

KW - perfect

KW - Spanish

KW - typological approach

KW - aspectualgrammeme

KW - semantics of perfect

KW - types of perfect

KW - perfect of persistentsituation

KW - perfect of recent past

KW - experiential perfect

KW - perfect of result

KW - currentrelevance

KW - invariant meaning

UR - https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27517032

M3 - статья

VL - 12

SP - 39

EP - 66

JO - Acta Linguistica Petropolitana

JF - Acta Linguistica Petropolitana

SN - 2306-5737

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 7587464