Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
Zur Konstruktion der sozialen Indexikalität der Sprache : von „Kollektiv‟ zu „Team‟. Und via Coronavirus-Pandemie zurück? / Chernyavskaya, Valeria; Nefedov, Sergei.
в: Studien zur Deutschen Sprache und Literatur, № 46, 03.12.2021, стр. 1-21.Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Zur Konstruktion der sozialen Indexikalität der Sprache
T2 - von „Kollektiv‟ zu „Team‟. Und via Coronavirus-Pandemie zurück?
AU - Chernyavskaya, Valeria
AU - Nefedov, Sergei
N1 - Funding Information: Ethics Committee Approval: Ethics committee aproval is not required for this study. Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed. Author Contributions: Conception/Design of Study-C.V., N.S.; Data Acquisition-C.V., N.S.; Data Analysis/ Interpretation-C.V., N.S.; Drafting Manuscript-C.V., N.S.; Critical Revision of Manuscript-C.V., N.S.; Final Approval and Accountability-C.V., N.S. Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. Grant Support: The authors declared that this study has received no financial support. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The authors. All right reserved.
PY - 2021/12/3
Y1 - 2021/12/3
N2 - The present paper aims to contribute to the discussion about the social indexicality of the linguistic sign. The analysis relates to the research question of how a language sign or utterance, used in a particular socio-cultural context, takes on socially relevant meanings. The analysis is informed by the concept of social indexicality and social meaning in sociolinguistics and discourse analysis. Social meaning is reflected as a type of pragmatic meaning of a linguistic form that can become a pointer to (or an index of) the social identities and the typical social contexts. Social meaning acts as an index of the context in which the linguistic unit is expected and appropriate. Social meanings are anchored through social practice. The article analyzes the contextualization of the word collective in German social discourse and thus information is obtained about the social meaning that communicants attach to the concept of collective in communicative interaction. It is revealed that the word collective became an indicator for the social practice of the German Democratic Republic and took the rank of a social index. The “having to fit into the community” praxis, typical for the past, the uniformity of society in GDR made the collective an undesirable word. Since 2020, the return of the lexeme has been recorded in active use to mark the realities that came with the pandemic and the limitation of individual freedom. The ties between a linguistic form and the practice in which it receives its social voice is explained. The study was carried out on the basis of the “Digital Dictionary of the German Language” as a corpus-based discourse analysis. The corpus of electronic texts on the coronavirus pandemic (the corona corpus) was examined.
AB - The present paper aims to contribute to the discussion about the social indexicality of the linguistic sign. The analysis relates to the research question of how a language sign or utterance, used in a particular socio-cultural context, takes on socially relevant meanings. The analysis is informed by the concept of social indexicality and social meaning in sociolinguistics and discourse analysis. Social meaning is reflected as a type of pragmatic meaning of a linguistic form that can become a pointer to (or an index of) the social identities and the typical social contexts. Social meaning acts as an index of the context in which the linguistic unit is expected and appropriate. Social meanings are anchored through social practice. The article analyzes the contextualization of the word collective in German social discourse and thus information is obtained about the social meaning that communicants attach to the concept of collective in communicative interaction. It is revealed that the word collective became an indicator for the social practice of the German Democratic Republic and took the rank of a social index. The “having to fit into the community” praxis, typical for the past, the uniformity of society in GDR made the collective an undesirable word. Since 2020, the return of the lexeme has been recorded in active use to mark the realities that came with the pandemic and the limitation of individual freedom. The ties between a linguistic form and the practice in which it receives its social voice is explained. The study was carried out on the basis of the “Digital Dictionary of the German Language” as a corpus-based discourse analysis. The corpus of electronic texts on the coronavirus pandemic (the corona corpus) was examined.
KW - soziale Bedeutung
KW - soziale Indexikalität
KW - Diskursanalyse
KW - Kollektiv
KW - Coronavirus-Pandemie
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122025294&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/f0cc6cb7-f185-3d03-a1d8-8a4444a5e94f/
U2 - 10.26650/sdsl2021-990815
DO - 10.26650/sdsl2021-990815
M3 - статья
AN - SCOPUS:85122025294
SP - 1
EP - 21
JO - Studien zur Deutschen Sprache und Literatur
JF - Studien zur Deutschen Sprache und Literatur
SN - 1303-9407
IS - 46
ER -
ID: 89587104