Standard

World Trade Organization: Quo vadis? / Sutyrin, S.F. ; Guan, Xueling; Jovanovic, M.N.; Mashayekhi, M.; Paugam, J.-M.; Portansky, A. P. ; Смитс, Мартен Вилием Антония Мария.

в: ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ЭКОНОМИКА, Том 36, № 4, 04.2020, стр. 543–578.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование

Harvard

Sutyrin, SF, Guan, X, Jovanovic, MN, Mashayekhi, M, Paugam, J-M, Portansky, AP & Смитс, МВАМ 2020, 'World Trade Organization: Quo vadis?', ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ЭКОНОМИКА, Том. 36, № 4, стр. 543–578. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2020.401

APA

Sutyrin, S. F., Guan, X., Jovanovic, M. N., Mashayekhi, M., Paugam, J-M., Portansky, A. P., & Смитс, М. В. А. М. (2020). World Trade Organization: Quo vadis? ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ЭКОНОМИКА, 36(4), 543–578. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2020.401

Vancouver

Sutyrin SF, Guan X, Jovanovic MN, Mashayekhi M, Paugam J-M, Portansky AP и пр. World Trade Organization: Quo vadis? ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ЭКОНОМИКА. 2020 Апр.;36(4):543–578. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2020.401

Author

Sutyrin, S.F. ; Guan, Xueling ; Jovanovic, M.N. ; Mashayekhi, M. ; Paugam, J.-M. ; Portansky, A. P. ; Смитс, Мартен Вилием Антония Мария. / World Trade Organization: Quo vadis?. в: ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ЭКОНОМИКА. 2020 ; Том 36, № 4. стр. 543–578.

BibTeX

@article{09aaa281abc5471dab22df90c5645e5f,
title = "World Trade Organization: Quo vadis?",
abstract = "During last couple of years, the academic community, national civil servants in charge of trade policies, and employees of international economic organizations have intensively discussed reforming the World Trade Organization. All participants of the debate tend to agree that the system of multilateral trade regulation in its present form does not match expectations and requirements. There is less unanimity regarding the reasons that have resulted in the poor performance of the institution under review. As for possible ways to solve the problem, existing opinions differ dramatically. Both expert views and official proposals of WTO members (Canada, EU, Japan, China and some others) deal with prospects for the Doha round, modalities of future agreements, decision-making process, and a range of other questions waiting for uneasy answers.",
author = "S.F. Sutyrin and Xueling Guan and M.N. Jovanovic and M. Mashayekhi and J.-M. Paugam and Portansky, {A. P.} and Смитс, {Мартен Вилием Антония Мария}",
note = "Sutyrin S. F., Guan Xueling, Jovanovic M. N., Mashayekhi M., Paugam J.-M., Portan-sky A. P., Smeets M. (2020) World Trade Organization: Quo vadis?St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 36, iss. 4, pp. 543–578. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2020.401",
year = "2020",
month = apr,
doi = "10.21638/spbu05.2020.401",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "543–578",
journal = " ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ЭКОНОМИКА",
issn = "1026-356X",
publisher = "Издательство Санкт-Петербургского университета",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - World Trade Organization: Quo vadis?

AU - Sutyrin, S.F.

AU - Guan, Xueling

AU - Jovanovic, M.N.

AU - Mashayekhi, M.

AU - Paugam, J.-M.

AU - Portansky, A. P.

AU - Смитс, Мартен Вилием Антония Мария

N1 - Sutyrin S. F., Guan Xueling, Jovanovic M. N., Mashayekhi M., Paugam J.-M., Portan-sky A. P., Smeets M. (2020) World Trade Organization: Quo vadis?St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 36, iss. 4, pp. 543–578. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2020.401

PY - 2020/4

Y1 - 2020/4

N2 - During last couple of years, the academic community, national civil servants in charge of trade policies, and employees of international economic organizations have intensively discussed reforming the World Trade Organization. All participants of the debate tend to agree that the system of multilateral trade regulation in its present form does not match expectations and requirements. There is less unanimity regarding the reasons that have resulted in the poor performance of the institution under review. As for possible ways to solve the problem, existing opinions differ dramatically. Both expert views and official proposals of WTO members (Canada, EU, Japan, China and some others) deal with prospects for the Doha round, modalities of future agreements, decision-making process, and a range of other questions waiting for uneasy answers.

AB - During last couple of years, the academic community, national civil servants in charge of trade policies, and employees of international economic organizations have intensively discussed reforming the World Trade Organization. All participants of the debate tend to agree that the system of multilateral trade regulation in its present form does not match expectations and requirements. There is less unanimity regarding the reasons that have resulted in the poor performance of the institution under review. As for possible ways to solve the problem, existing opinions differ dramatically. Both expert views and official proposals of WTO members (Canada, EU, Japan, China and some others) deal with prospects for the Doha round, modalities of future agreements, decision-making process, and a range of other questions waiting for uneasy answers.

UR - https://economicsjournal.spbu.ru/article/view/10431/7483

UR - https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44806925

U2 - 10.21638/spbu05.2020.401

DO - 10.21638/spbu05.2020.401

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 543

EP - 578

JO - ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ЭКОНОМИКА

JF - ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ЭКОНОМИКА

SN - 1026-356X

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 76388287