Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
What Counts Versus What Can Be Counted : The Complex Interplay of Market Orientation and Marketing Performance Measurement. / Frösén, Johanna; Luoma, Jukka; Jaakkola, Matti; Tikkanen, Henrikki; Aspara, Jaakko.
в: Journal of Marketing, Том 80, № 3, 2016, стр. 60-78.Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - What Counts Versus What Can Be Counted
T2 - The Complex Interplay of Market Orientation and Marketing Performance Measurement
AU - Frösén, Johanna
AU - Luoma, Jukka
AU - Jaakkola, Matti
AU - Tikkanen, Henrikki
AU - Aspara, Jaakko
N1 - Frösén, J. What Counts Versus What Can Be Counted: The Complex Interplay of Market Orientation and Marketing Performance Measurement / J. Frösén, J. Luoma, M. Jaakkola, H. Tikkanen, J. Aspara // Journal of Marketing. - 2016. - Volume 80, Issue 3. - P. 60-78.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Market orientation (MO) and marketing performance measurement (MPM) are two of the most widespread strategic marketing concepts among practitioners. However, some have questioned the benefits of extensive investments in MO and MPM. More importantly, little is known about which combinations of MO and MPM are optimal in ensuring high business performance. To address this research gap, the authors analyze a unique data set of 628 firms with a novel method of configurational analysis: fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. In line with prior research, the authors find that MO is an important determinant of business performance. However, to reap its benefits, managers need to complement it with appropriate MPM, the level and focus of which vary across firms. For example, whereas large firms and market leaders generally benefit from comprehensive MPM, small firms may benefit from measuring marketing performance only selectively or by focusing on particular dimensions of marketing performance. The study also fi
AB - Market orientation (MO) and marketing performance measurement (MPM) are two of the most widespread strategic marketing concepts among practitioners. However, some have questioned the benefits of extensive investments in MO and MPM. More importantly, little is known about which combinations of MO and MPM are optimal in ensuring high business performance. To address this research gap, the authors analyze a unique data set of 628 firms with a novel method of configurational analysis: fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. In line with prior research, the authors find that MO is an important determinant of business performance. However, to reap its benefits, managers need to complement it with appropriate MPM, the level and focus of which vary across firms. For example, whereas large firms and market leaders generally benefit from comprehensive MPM, small firms may benefit from measuring marketing performance only selectively or by focusing on particular dimensions of marketing performance. The study also fi
KW - organizational configurations
KW - marketing control
KW - market orientation
KW - marketing performance measurement
KW - business performance
KW - SCOPUS
KW - РИНЦ
M3 - Article
VL - 80
SP - 60
EP - 78
JO - Journal of Marketing
JF - Journal of Marketing
SN - 0022-2429
IS - 3
ER -
ID: 7563993