TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding of comical texts in people with different types of attitudes towards humour

T2 - Evidence from Internet memes

AU - Rivin, Daniil

AU - Shcherbakova, Olga

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021. All Rights Reserved.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - This study aimed to test a hypothesis about the correlation between levels of gelotophobia, gelotophilia, and katagelasticism and understanding of Internet memes as a specific form of humour. Participants were 45 native speakers of Russian (aged 18 - 30; 73,3 % female). The levels of Internet memes understanding were assessed independently by two judges with the use of criteria based on the results of a series of semi-structured in-depth interviews. Gelotophobia, gelotophilia, and katagelasticism were assessed with PhoPhiKat <30> questionnaire. J. Raven's “Standard Progressive Matrices” test was used to control the level of psychometric intelligence. Concordance of judges' scores for the understanding of memes was assessed with Kendall's W and ranged from 0.71 to 0.84. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to test the main hypothesis. We found no correlation between the scores for gelotophobia, gelotophilia, and katagelasticism and understanding of Internet memes. Presumably, the type of attitude towards humour does not play a significant role in the understanding of comical texts. The qualitative content analysis of the interview protocols revealed some specific features of cognitive mechanisms of Internet memes understanding. Namely, successful participants with higher levels of understanding of Internet memes reflected more on their thinking process than those with lower levels of understanding of Internet memes, easily switched from an abstract level of reasoning to a concrete one, and tended to consistently develop detailed mental representations of the memes.

AB - This study aimed to test a hypothesis about the correlation between levels of gelotophobia, gelotophilia, and katagelasticism and understanding of Internet memes as a specific form of humour. Participants were 45 native speakers of Russian (aged 18 - 30; 73,3 % female). The levels of Internet memes understanding were assessed independently by two judges with the use of criteria based on the results of a series of semi-structured in-depth interviews. Gelotophobia, gelotophilia, and katagelasticism were assessed with PhoPhiKat <30> questionnaire. J. Raven's “Standard Progressive Matrices” test was used to control the level of psychometric intelligence. Concordance of judges' scores for the understanding of memes was assessed with Kendall's W and ranged from 0.71 to 0.84. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to test the main hypothesis. We found no correlation between the scores for gelotophobia, gelotophilia, and katagelasticism and understanding of Internet memes. Presumably, the type of attitude towards humour does not play a significant role in the understanding of comical texts. The qualitative content analysis of the interview protocols revealed some specific features of cognitive mechanisms of Internet memes understanding. Namely, successful participants with higher levels of understanding of Internet memes reflected more on their thinking process than those with lower levels of understanding of Internet memes, easily switched from an abstract level of reasoning to a concrete one, and tended to consistently develop detailed mental representations of the memes.

KW - gelotophilia

KW - gelotophobia

KW - humour understanding

KW - Internet memes

KW - katagelasticism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115717765&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7592/EJHR2021.9.2.456

DO - 10.7592/EJHR2021.9.2.456

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85115717765

VL - 9

SP - 112

EP - 131

JO - European Journal of Humour Research

JF - European Journal of Humour Research

SN - 2307-700X

IS - 2

ER -