Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
The social verification of implicit knowledge in dyads: the mediating role of confidence. / Tikhonov, Roman; Moroshkina, Nadezhda.
в: Journal of Cognitive Psychology, Том 35, № 5, 12.06.2023, стр. 578-593.Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - The social verification of implicit knowledge in dyads: the mediating role of confidence
AU - Tikhonov, Roman
AU - Moroshkina, Nadezhda
PY - 2023/6/12
Y1 - 2023/6/12
N2 - We studied the effect of dyadic interaction on implicit learning using a visual artificial grammar learning task. Specifically, we were interested in metacognitive experiences involved in the social verification of implicit knowledge. The experiment consisted of a learning phase followed by dyadic and individual test phases. The experimental group exchanged initial responses and confidence ratings in the dyadic test phase before revising their judgments. In the control group, participants could revise their responses but had no communication. We expected that sharing metacognitive experiences and initial responses would improve the accuracy of judgments and the underlying implicit knowledge. Our findings revealed the social verification effect in the dyadic test phase (but not in the individual test phase) that occurs selectively due to the mediating role of confidence. We conclude that dyadic interaction can mitigate the detrimental effects of response revision when applying implicitly learned regularities.
AB - We studied the effect of dyadic interaction on implicit learning using a visual artificial grammar learning task. Specifically, we were interested in metacognitive experiences involved in the social verification of implicit knowledge. The experiment consisted of a learning phase followed by dyadic and individual test phases. The experimental group exchanged initial responses and confidence ratings in the dyadic test phase before revising their judgments. In the control group, participants could revise their responses but had no communication. We expected that sharing metacognitive experiences and initial responses would improve the accuracy of judgments and the underlying implicit knowledge. Our findings revealed the social verification effect in the dyadic test phase (but not in the individual test phase) that occurs selectively due to the mediating role of confidence. We conclude that dyadic interaction can mitigate the detrimental effects of response revision when applying implicitly learned regularities.
KW - Implicit learning
KW - artificial grammar learning
KW - dyadic interaction
KW - knowledge verification
KW - metacognitive experiences
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/8de0f413-44ec-3e4e-9c2e-2053c0a2f8dc/
U2 - 10.1080/20445911.2023.2220924
DO - 10.1080/20445911.2023.2220924
M3 - Article
VL - 35
SP - 578
EP - 593
JO - Journal of Cognitive Psychology
JF - Journal of Cognitive Psychology
SN - 2044-5911
IS - 5
ER -
ID: 106362629