Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
The relationship between intelligence and divergent thinking—a meta-analytic update. / Gerwig, Anne; Miroshnik, Kirill; Forthmann, Boris; Benedek, Mathias; Karwowski, Maciej; Holling, Heinz.
в: Journal of Intelligence, Том 9, № 2, 23, 20.04.2021.Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - The relationship between intelligence and divergent thinking—a meta-analytic update
AU - Gerwig, Anne
AU - Miroshnik, Kirill
AU - Forthmann, Boris
AU - Benedek, Mathias
AU - Karwowski, Maciej
AU - Holling, Heinz
PY - 2021/4/20
Y1 - 2021/4/20
N2 - This paper provides a meta-analytic update on the relationship between intelligence and divergent thinking (DT), as research on this topic has increased, and methods have diversified since Kim’s meta-analysis in 2005. A three-level meta-analysis was used to analyze 849 correlation coefficients from 112 studies with an overall N = 34,610. The overall effect showed a significant positive correlation of r = .25. This increase of the correlation as compared to Kim’s prior meta-analytic findings could be attributed to the correction of attenuation because a difference between effect sizes prior-Kim vs. post-Kim was non-significant. Different moderators such as scoring methods, instructional settings, intelligence facets, and task modality were tested together with theoretically relevant interactions between some of these factors. These moderation analyses showed that the intelligence–DT relationship can be higher (up to r = .31–.37) when employing test-like assessments coupled with be-creative instructions, and considering DT originality scores. The facet of intelligence (g vs. gf vs. gc ) did not affect the correlation between intelligence and DT. Furthermore, we found two significant sample characteristics: (a) average sample age was positively associated with the intelligence–DT correlation, and (b) the intelligence–DT correlation decreased for samples with increasing percentages of females in the samples. Finally, inter-moderator correlations were checked to take potential confounding into account, and also publication bias was assessed. This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive picture of current research and possible research gaps. Theoretical implications, as well as recommendations for future research, are discussed.
AB - This paper provides a meta-analytic update on the relationship between intelligence and divergent thinking (DT), as research on this topic has increased, and methods have diversified since Kim’s meta-analysis in 2005. A three-level meta-analysis was used to analyze 849 correlation coefficients from 112 studies with an overall N = 34,610. The overall effect showed a significant positive correlation of r = .25. This increase of the correlation as compared to Kim’s prior meta-analytic findings could be attributed to the correction of attenuation because a difference between effect sizes prior-Kim vs. post-Kim was non-significant. Different moderators such as scoring methods, instructional settings, intelligence facets, and task modality were tested together with theoretically relevant interactions between some of these factors. These moderation analyses showed that the intelligence–DT relationship can be higher (up to r = .31–.37) when employing test-like assessments coupled with be-creative instructions, and considering DT originality scores. The facet of intelligence (g vs. gf vs. gc ) did not affect the correlation between intelligence and DT. Furthermore, we found two significant sample characteristics: (a) average sample age was positively associated with the intelligence–DT correlation, and (b) the intelligence–DT correlation decreased for samples with increasing percentages of females in the samples. Finally, inter-moderator correlations were checked to take potential confounding into account, and also publication bias was assessed. This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive picture of current research and possible research gaps. Theoretical implications, as well as recommendations for future research, are discussed.
KW - Crystallized intelligence
KW - Divergent thinking
KW - Fluid intelligence
KW - Intelligence
KW - Meta-analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103397241&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/JINTELLIGENCE9020023
DO - 10.3390/JINTELLIGENCE9020023
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85103397241
VL - 9
JO - Journal of Intelligence
JF - Journal of Intelligence
SN - 2079-3200
IS - 2
M1 - 23
ER -
ID: 106920362