Standard

The relationship between intelligence and divergent thinking—a meta-analytic update. / Gerwig, Anne; Miroshnik, Kirill; Forthmann, Boris; Benedek, Mathias; Karwowski, Maciej; Holling, Heinz.

в: Journal of Intelligence, Том 9, № 2, 23, 20.04.2021.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

Gerwig, A, Miroshnik, K, Forthmann, B, Benedek, M, Karwowski, M & Holling, H 2021, 'The relationship between intelligence and divergent thinking—a meta-analytic update', Journal of Intelligence, Том. 9, № 2, 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/JINTELLIGENCE9020023

APA

Gerwig, A., Miroshnik, K., Forthmann, B., Benedek, M., Karwowski, M., & Holling, H. (2021). The relationship between intelligence and divergent thinking—a meta-analytic update. Journal of Intelligence, 9(2), [23]. https://doi.org/10.3390/JINTELLIGENCE9020023

Vancouver

Gerwig A, Miroshnik K, Forthmann B, Benedek M, Karwowski M, Holling H. The relationship between intelligence and divergent thinking—a meta-analytic update. Journal of Intelligence. 2021 Апр. 20;9(2). 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/JINTELLIGENCE9020023

Author

Gerwig, Anne ; Miroshnik, Kirill ; Forthmann, Boris ; Benedek, Mathias ; Karwowski, Maciej ; Holling, Heinz. / The relationship between intelligence and divergent thinking—a meta-analytic update. в: Journal of Intelligence. 2021 ; Том 9, № 2.

BibTeX

@article{58dab8ce60e148ddb3fe18e9c0407039,
title = "The relationship between intelligence and divergent thinking—a meta-analytic update",
abstract = "This paper provides a meta-analytic update on the relationship between intelligence and divergent thinking (DT), as research on this topic has increased, and methods have diversified since Kim{\textquoteright}s meta-analysis in 2005. A three-level meta-analysis was used to analyze 849 correlation coefficients from 112 studies with an overall N = 34,610. The overall effect showed a significant positive correlation of r = .25. This increase of the correlation as compared to Kim{\textquoteright}s prior meta-analytic findings could be attributed to the correction of attenuation because a difference between effect sizes prior-Kim vs. post-Kim was non-significant. Different moderators such as scoring methods, instructional settings, intelligence facets, and task modality were tested together with theoretically relevant interactions between some of these factors. These moderation analyses showed that the intelligence–DT relationship can be higher (up to r = .31–.37) when employing test-like assessments coupled with be-creative instructions, and considering DT originality scores. The facet of intelligence (g vs. gf vs. gc ) did not affect the correlation between intelligence and DT. Furthermore, we found two significant sample characteristics: (a) average sample age was positively associated with the intelligence–DT correlation, and (b) the intelligence–DT correlation decreased for samples with increasing percentages of females in the samples. Finally, inter-moderator correlations were checked to take potential confounding into account, and also publication bias was assessed. This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive picture of current research and possible research gaps. Theoretical implications, as well as recommendations for future research, are discussed.",
keywords = "Crystallized intelligence, Divergent thinking, Fluid intelligence, Intelligence, Meta-analysis",
author = "Anne Gerwig and Kirill Miroshnik and Boris Forthmann and Mathias Benedek and Maciej Karwowski and Heinz Holling",
year = "2021",
month = apr,
day = "20",
doi = "10.3390/JINTELLIGENCE9020023",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Journal of Intelligence",
issn = "2079-3200",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The relationship between intelligence and divergent thinking—a meta-analytic update

AU - Gerwig, Anne

AU - Miroshnik, Kirill

AU - Forthmann, Boris

AU - Benedek, Mathias

AU - Karwowski, Maciej

AU - Holling, Heinz

PY - 2021/4/20

Y1 - 2021/4/20

N2 - This paper provides a meta-analytic update on the relationship between intelligence and divergent thinking (DT), as research on this topic has increased, and methods have diversified since Kim’s meta-analysis in 2005. A three-level meta-analysis was used to analyze 849 correlation coefficients from 112 studies with an overall N = 34,610. The overall effect showed a significant positive correlation of r = .25. This increase of the correlation as compared to Kim’s prior meta-analytic findings could be attributed to the correction of attenuation because a difference between effect sizes prior-Kim vs. post-Kim was non-significant. Different moderators such as scoring methods, instructional settings, intelligence facets, and task modality were tested together with theoretically relevant interactions between some of these factors. These moderation analyses showed that the intelligence–DT relationship can be higher (up to r = .31–.37) when employing test-like assessments coupled with be-creative instructions, and considering DT originality scores. The facet of intelligence (g vs. gf vs. gc ) did not affect the correlation between intelligence and DT. Furthermore, we found two significant sample characteristics: (a) average sample age was positively associated with the intelligence–DT correlation, and (b) the intelligence–DT correlation decreased for samples with increasing percentages of females in the samples. Finally, inter-moderator correlations were checked to take potential confounding into account, and also publication bias was assessed. This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive picture of current research and possible research gaps. Theoretical implications, as well as recommendations for future research, are discussed.

AB - This paper provides a meta-analytic update on the relationship between intelligence and divergent thinking (DT), as research on this topic has increased, and methods have diversified since Kim’s meta-analysis in 2005. A three-level meta-analysis was used to analyze 849 correlation coefficients from 112 studies with an overall N = 34,610. The overall effect showed a significant positive correlation of r = .25. This increase of the correlation as compared to Kim’s prior meta-analytic findings could be attributed to the correction of attenuation because a difference between effect sizes prior-Kim vs. post-Kim was non-significant. Different moderators such as scoring methods, instructional settings, intelligence facets, and task modality were tested together with theoretically relevant interactions between some of these factors. These moderation analyses showed that the intelligence–DT relationship can be higher (up to r = .31–.37) when employing test-like assessments coupled with be-creative instructions, and considering DT originality scores. The facet of intelligence (g vs. gf vs. gc ) did not affect the correlation between intelligence and DT. Furthermore, we found two significant sample characteristics: (a) average sample age was positively associated with the intelligence–DT correlation, and (b) the intelligence–DT correlation decreased for samples with increasing percentages of females in the samples. Finally, inter-moderator correlations were checked to take potential confounding into account, and also publication bias was assessed. This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive picture of current research and possible research gaps. Theoretical implications, as well as recommendations for future research, are discussed.

KW - Crystallized intelligence

KW - Divergent thinking

KW - Fluid intelligence

KW - Intelligence

KW - Meta-analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103397241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/JINTELLIGENCE9020023

DO - 10.3390/JINTELLIGENCE9020023

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85103397241

VL - 9

JO - Journal of Intelligence

JF - Journal of Intelligence

SN - 2079-3200

IS - 2

M1 - 23

ER -

ID: 106920362