Standard

The Eavesdropping and Jamming Dilemma in Multi-Channel Communications. / Garnaev, A.; Trappe, W.

2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), June 9-13, 2013, Budapest, Hungary. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2013. стр. 2160-2164.

Результаты исследований: Публикации в книгах, отчётах, сборниках, трудах конференцийстатья в сборнике материалов конференциинаучная

Harvard

Garnaev, A & Trappe, W 2013, The Eavesdropping and Jamming Dilemma in Multi-Channel Communications. в 2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), June 9-13, 2013, Budapest, Hungary. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., стр. 2160-2164. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2013.6654847

APA

Garnaev, A., & Trappe, W. (2013). The Eavesdropping and Jamming Dilemma in Multi-Channel Communications. в 2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), June 9-13, 2013, Budapest, Hungary (стр. 2160-2164). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2013.6654847

Vancouver

Garnaev A, Trappe W. The Eavesdropping and Jamming Dilemma in Multi-Channel Communications. в 2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), June 9-13, 2013, Budapest, Hungary. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 2013. стр. 2160-2164 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2013.6654847

Author

Garnaev, A. ; Trappe, W. / The Eavesdropping and Jamming Dilemma in Multi-Channel Communications. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), June 9-13, 2013, Budapest, Hungary. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2013. стр. 2160-2164

BibTeX

@inproceedings{8e4be158f372404ba9c06d414f0cddfc,
title = "The Eavesdropping and Jamming Dilemma in Multi-Channel Communications",
abstract = "We consider the game where Alice wants to communicate with Bob secretely, while Eve wants to hinder this objective by either eavesdropping or jamming, though she cannot employ both eavesdropping and jamming simultaneously. Alice is employing a multi-channel communication scheme, such as OFDM, and can control the transmit power allocation of her signal among the channels. If Eve chooses to jam, she can control her jamming power allocation amongst the channels, but in this case cannot eavesdrop. In this paper we examine three different patterns for Alice's (and Eve's) behavior: (a) Alice assumes Eve employs either a pure jamming or eavesdropping strategy and determines her optimal mixed strategy under this assumption; (b) assuming a fixed probability with which Eve will jam/eavesdrop, Alice/Eve's equilibrium power allocation strategies can be determined, and then Eve chooses the probability that maximizes her payoff; (c) Eve chooses between two modes (either to jam or eavesdrop) as well as power allocations sim",
author = "A. Garnaev and W. Trappe",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1109/ICC.2013.6654847",
language = "English",
pages = "2160--2164",
booktitle = "2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), June 9-13, 2013, Budapest, Hungary",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
address = "United States",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - The Eavesdropping and Jamming Dilemma in Multi-Channel Communications

AU - Garnaev, A.

AU - Trappe, W.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - We consider the game where Alice wants to communicate with Bob secretely, while Eve wants to hinder this objective by either eavesdropping or jamming, though she cannot employ both eavesdropping and jamming simultaneously. Alice is employing a multi-channel communication scheme, such as OFDM, and can control the transmit power allocation of her signal among the channels. If Eve chooses to jam, she can control her jamming power allocation amongst the channels, but in this case cannot eavesdrop. In this paper we examine three different patterns for Alice's (and Eve's) behavior: (a) Alice assumes Eve employs either a pure jamming or eavesdropping strategy and determines her optimal mixed strategy under this assumption; (b) assuming a fixed probability with which Eve will jam/eavesdrop, Alice/Eve's equilibrium power allocation strategies can be determined, and then Eve chooses the probability that maximizes her payoff; (c) Eve chooses between two modes (either to jam or eavesdrop) as well as power allocations sim

AB - We consider the game where Alice wants to communicate with Bob secretely, while Eve wants to hinder this objective by either eavesdropping or jamming, though she cannot employ both eavesdropping and jamming simultaneously. Alice is employing a multi-channel communication scheme, such as OFDM, and can control the transmit power allocation of her signal among the channels. If Eve chooses to jam, she can control her jamming power allocation amongst the channels, but in this case cannot eavesdrop. In this paper we examine three different patterns for Alice's (and Eve's) behavior: (a) Alice assumes Eve employs either a pure jamming or eavesdropping strategy and determines her optimal mixed strategy under this assumption; (b) assuming a fixed probability with which Eve will jam/eavesdrop, Alice/Eve's equilibrium power allocation strategies can be determined, and then Eve chooses the probability that maximizes her payoff; (c) Eve chooses between two modes (either to jam or eavesdrop) as well as power allocations sim

U2 - 10.1109/ICC.2013.6654847

DO - 10.1109/ICC.2013.6654847

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 2160

EP - 2164

BT - 2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), June 9-13, 2013, Budapest, Hungary

PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

ER -

ID: 4727505