Результаты исследований: Публикации в книгах, отчётах, сборниках, трудах конференций › статья в сборнике материалов конференции › научная
The Eavesdropping and Jamming Dilemma in Multi-Channel Communications. / Garnaev, A.; Trappe, W.
2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), June 9-13, 2013, Budapest, Hungary. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2013. стр. 2160-2164.Результаты исследований: Публикации в книгах, отчётах, сборниках, трудах конференций › статья в сборнике материалов конференции › научная
}
TY - GEN
T1 - The Eavesdropping and Jamming Dilemma in Multi-Channel Communications
AU - Garnaev, A.
AU - Trappe, W.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - We consider the game where Alice wants to communicate with Bob secretely, while Eve wants to hinder this objective by either eavesdropping or jamming, though she cannot employ both eavesdropping and jamming simultaneously. Alice is employing a multi-channel communication scheme, such as OFDM, and can control the transmit power allocation of her signal among the channels. If Eve chooses to jam, she can control her jamming power allocation amongst the channels, but in this case cannot eavesdrop. In this paper we examine three different patterns for Alice's (and Eve's) behavior: (a) Alice assumes Eve employs either a pure jamming or eavesdropping strategy and determines her optimal mixed strategy under this assumption; (b) assuming a fixed probability with which Eve will jam/eavesdrop, Alice/Eve's equilibrium power allocation strategies can be determined, and then Eve chooses the probability that maximizes her payoff; (c) Eve chooses between two modes (either to jam or eavesdrop) as well as power allocations sim
AB - We consider the game where Alice wants to communicate with Bob secretely, while Eve wants to hinder this objective by either eavesdropping or jamming, though she cannot employ both eavesdropping and jamming simultaneously. Alice is employing a multi-channel communication scheme, such as OFDM, and can control the transmit power allocation of her signal among the channels. If Eve chooses to jam, she can control her jamming power allocation amongst the channels, but in this case cannot eavesdrop. In this paper we examine three different patterns for Alice's (and Eve's) behavior: (a) Alice assumes Eve employs either a pure jamming or eavesdropping strategy and determines her optimal mixed strategy under this assumption; (b) assuming a fixed probability with which Eve will jam/eavesdrop, Alice/Eve's equilibrium power allocation strategies can be determined, and then Eve chooses the probability that maximizes her payoff; (c) Eve chooses between two modes (either to jam or eavesdrop) as well as power allocations sim
U2 - 10.1109/ICC.2013.6654847
DO - 10.1109/ICC.2013.6654847
M3 - Conference contribution
SP - 2160
EP - 2164
BT - 2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), June 9-13, 2013, Budapest, Hungary
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
ER -
ID: 4727505