Standard

Testing the efforts model of simultaneous interpreting : An ERP study. / Koshkin, Roman; Shtyrov, Yury; Myachykov, Andriy; Ossadtchi, Alex.

в: PLoS ONE, Том 13, № 10, e0206129, 24.10.2018.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование

Harvard

Koshkin, R, Shtyrov, Y, Myachykov, A & Ossadtchi, A 2018, 'Testing the efforts model of simultaneous interpreting: An ERP study', PLoS ONE, Том. 13, № 10, e0206129. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206129

APA

Koshkin, R., Shtyrov, Y., Myachykov, A., & Ossadtchi, A. (2018). Testing the efforts model of simultaneous interpreting: An ERP study. PLoS ONE, 13(10), [e0206129]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206129

Vancouver

Koshkin R, Shtyrov Y, Myachykov A, Ossadtchi A. Testing the efforts model of simultaneous interpreting: An ERP study. PLoS ONE. 2018 Окт. 24;13(10). e0206129. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206129

Author

Koshkin, Roman ; Shtyrov, Yury ; Myachykov, Andriy ; Ossadtchi, Alex. / Testing the efforts model of simultaneous interpreting : An ERP study. в: PLoS ONE. 2018 ; Том 13, № 10.

BibTeX

@article{59fdd467eae14f669ac225f85040d1f7,
title = "Testing the efforts model of simultaneous interpreting: An ERP study",
abstract = "We utilized the event-related potential (ERP) technique to study neural activity associated with different levels of working memory (WM) load during simultaneous interpretation (SI) of continuous prose. The amplitude of N1 and P1 components elicited by task-irrelevant tone probes was significantly modulated as a function of WM load but not the direction of interpretation. Furthermore, the latency of the P1 increased significantly with WM load. The WM load effect on N1 latency, however, did not reach significance. Larger negativity under lower WM loads suggests that more attention is available to process the source message, providing the first electrophysiological evidence in support of the Efforts Model of SI. Relationships between the direction of interpretation and median WM load are also discussed.",
keywords = "WORKING-MEMORY, SELECTIVE-ATTENTION, INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES, PROCESSING NEGATIVITY, WORD RECOGNITION, LANGUAGE, MECHANISMS, BRAIN, FREQUENCY, TIME",
author = "Roman Koshkin and Yury Shtyrov and Andriy Myachykov and Alex Ossadtchi",
year = "2018",
month = oct,
day = "24",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0206129",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testing the efforts model of simultaneous interpreting

T2 - An ERP study

AU - Koshkin, Roman

AU - Shtyrov, Yury

AU - Myachykov, Andriy

AU - Ossadtchi, Alex

PY - 2018/10/24

Y1 - 2018/10/24

N2 - We utilized the event-related potential (ERP) technique to study neural activity associated with different levels of working memory (WM) load during simultaneous interpretation (SI) of continuous prose. The amplitude of N1 and P1 components elicited by task-irrelevant tone probes was significantly modulated as a function of WM load but not the direction of interpretation. Furthermore, the latency of the P1 increased significantly with WM load. The WM load effect on N1 latency, however, did not reach significance. Larger negativity under lower WM loads suggests that more attention is available to process the source message, providing the first electrophysiological evidence in support of the Efforts Model of SI. Relationships between the direction of interpretation and median WM load are also discussed.

AB - We utilized the event-related potential (ERP) technique to study neural activity associated with different levels of working memory (WM) load during simultaneous interpretation (SI) of continuous prose. The amplitude of N1 and P1 components elicited by task-irrelevant tone probes was significantly modulated as a function of WM load but not the direction of interpretation. Furthermore, the latency of the P1 increased significantly with WM load. The WM load effect on N1 latency, however, did not reach significance. Larger negativity under lower WM loads suggests that more attention is available to process the source message, providing the first electrophysiological evidence in support of the Efforts Model of SI. Relationships between the direction of interpretation and median WM load are also discussed.

KW - WORKING-MEMORY

KW - SELECTIVE-ATTENTION

KW - INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES

KW - PROCESSING NEGATIVITY

KW - WORD RECOGNITION

KW - LANGUAGE

KW - MECHANISMS

KW - BRAIN

KW - FREQUENCY

KW - TIME

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055421974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/testing-efforts-model-simultaneous-interpreting-erp-study

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0206129

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0206129

M3 - Article

C2 - 30356337

AN - SCOPUS:85055421974

VL - 13

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 10

M1 - e0206129

ER -

ID: 35998376