Standard

Steady magnetospheric convection : A review of recent results. / Sergeev, VA; Pellinen, RJ; Pulkkinen, TI.

в: Space Science Reviews, Том 75, № 3-4, 02.1996, стр. 551-604.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхОбзорная статьяРецензирование

Harvard

Sergeev, VA, Pellinen, RJ & Pulkkinen, TI 1996, 'Steady magnetospheric convection: A review of recent results', Space Science Reviews, Том. 75, № 3-4, стр. 551-604. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00833344

APA

Sergeev, VA., Pellinen, RJ., & Pulkkinen, TI. (1996). Steady magnetospheric convection: A review of recent results. Space Science Reviews, 75(3-4), 551-604. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00833344

Vancouver

Sergeev VA, Pellinen RJ, Pulkkinen TI. Steady magnetospheric convection: A review of recent results. Space Science Reviews. 1996 Февр.;75(3-4):551-604. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00833344

Author

Sergeev, VA ; Pellinen, RJ ; Pulkkinen, TI. / Steady magnetospheric convection : A review of recent results. в: Space Science Reviews. 1996 ; Том 75, № 3-4. стр. 551-604.

BibTeX

@article{717afb6b492149b7a752fecb48b2e35f,
title = "Steady magnetospheric convection: A review of recent results",
abstract = "Theoretical pressure balance arguments have implied that steady convection is hardly possible in the terrestrial magnetotail and that steady energy input necessarily generates a cyclic loading-unloading sequence, i.e., repetitive substorms. However, observations have revealed that enhanced solar wind energy input to the magnetospheric system may either lead to substorm activity or enhanced but steady convection. This topic is reviewed with emphasis on several recent case studies of the Steady Magnetospheric Convection (SMC) events. In these cases extensive data sets from both satellite and ground-based instruments from various magnetospheric and ionospheric regions were available.Accurate distinction of the spatial and temporal scales of the magnetospheric processes is vital for correct interpretation of the observations during SMC periods. We show that on the large scale, the magnetospheric configuration and plasma convection are stable during SMC events, but that both reveal considerable differences from their quiet-time assemblies. On a shorter time scale, there are numerous transient activations which are similar to those found during substorms, but which presumably originate from a more distant tail reconnection process, and map to the poleward boundary of the auroral oval. The available observations and the unresolved questions are summarized here.The tail magnetic field during SMC events resembles both substorm growth and recovery phases in the neartail and midtail, respectively, but this configuration may remain stable for up to ten hours. Based on observations and model results we discuss how the magnetospheric system avoids pressure balance problems when the plasma convects earthward.Finally, the importance of further coordinated studies of SMC events is emphasized. Such studies may shed more light on the substorm dynamics and help to verify quantitatively the theoretical models of the convecting magnetosphere.",
keywords = "SUBSTORM GROWTH-PHASE, INNER PLASMA SHEET, MAGNETIC-FIELD, GEOMAGNETIC-ACTIVITY, MAGNETOTAIL ENERGY, EARTHS MAGNETOTAIL, AURORAL OVAL, SOLAR-WIND, FLUX TUBES, ION-BEAMS",
author = "VA Sergeev and RJ Pellinen and TI Pulkkinen",
year = "1996",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1007/BF00833344",
language = "Английский",
volume = "75",
pages = "551--604",
journal = "Space Science Reviews",
issn = "0038-6308",
publisher = "Springer Nature",
number = "3-4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Steady magnetospheric convection

T2 - A review of recent results

AU - Sergeev, VA

AU - Pellinen, RJ

AU - Pulkkinen, TI

PY - 1996/2

Y1 - 1996/2

N2 - Theoretical pressure balance arguments have implied that steady convection is hardly possible in the terrestrial magnetotail and that steady energy input necessarily generates a cyclic loading-unloading sequence, i.e., repetitive substorms. However, observations have revealed that enhanced solar wind energy input to the magnetospheric system may either lead to substorm activity or enhanced but steady convection. This topic is reviewed with emphasis on several recent case studies of the Steady Magnetospheric Convection (SMC) events. In these cases extensive data sets from both satellite and ground-based instruments from various magnetospheric and ionospheric regions were available.Accurate distinction of the spatial and temporal scales of the magnetospheric processes is vital for correct interpretation of the observations during SMC periods. We show that on the large scale, the magnetospheric configuration and plasma convection are stable during SMC events, but that both reveal considerable differences from their quiet-time assemblies. On a shorter time scale, there are numerous transient activations which are similar to those found during substorms, but which presumably originate from a more distant tail reconnection process, and map to the poleward boundary of the auroral oval. The available observations and the unresolved questions are summarized here.The tail magnetic field during SMC events resembles both substorm growth and recovery phases in the neartail and midtail, respectively, but this configuration may remain stable for up to ten hours. Based on observations and model results we discuss how the magnetospheric system avoids pressure balance problems when the plasma convects earthward.Finally, the importance of further coordinated studies of SMC events is emphasized. Such studies may shed more light on the substorm dynamics and help to verify quantitatively the theoretical models of the convecting magnetosphere.

AB - Theoretical pressure balance arguments have implied that steady convection is hardly possible in the terrestrial magnetotail and that steady energy input necessarily generates a cyclic loading-unloading sequence, i.e., repetitive substorms. However, observations have revealed that enhanced solar wind energy input to the magnetospheric system may either lead to substorm activity or enhanced but steady convection. This topic is reviewed with emphasis on several recent case studies of the Steady Magnetospheric Convection (SMC) events. In these cases extensive data sets from both satellite and ground-based instruments from various magnetospheric and ionospheric regions were available.Accurate distinction of the spatial and temporal scales of the magnetospheric processes is vital for correct interpretation of the observations during SMC periods. We show that on the large scale, the magnetospheric configuration and plasma convection are stable during SMC events, but that both reveal considerable differences from their quiet-time assemblies. On a shorter time scale, there are numerous transient activations which are similar to those found during substorms, but which presumably originate from a more distant tail reconnection process, and map to the poleward boundary of the auroral oval. The available observations and the unresolved questions are summarized here.The tail magnetic field during SMC events resembles both substorm growth and recovery phases in the neartail and midtail, respectively, but this configuration may remain stable for up to ten hours. Based on observations and model results we discuss how the magnetospheric system avoids pressure balance problems when the plasma convects earthward.Finally, the importance of further coordinated studies of SMC events is emphasized. Such studies may shed more light on the substorm dynamics and help to verify quantitatively the theoretical models of the convecting magnetosphere.

KW - SUBSTORM GROWTH-PHASE

KW - INNER PLASMA SHEET

KW - MAGNETIC-FIELD

KW - GEOMAGNETIC-ACTIVITY

KW - MAGNETOTAIL ENERGY

KW - EARTHS MAGNETOTAIL

KW - AURORAL OVAL

KW - SOLAR-WIND

KW - FLUX TUBES

KW - ION-BEAMS

U2 - 10.1007/BF00833344

DO - 10.1007/BF00833344

M3 - Обзорная статья

VL - 75

SP - 551

EP - 604

JO - Space Science Reviews

JF - Space Science Reviews

SN - 0038-6308

IS - 3-4

ER -

ID: 36635078