Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
Spinolaminar locking plates improve fixation strength compared to pedicle screws : a biomechanical analysis. / Kondrashov, Dimitriy G; Piple, Amit S; Ungurean, Victor; Schlauch, Adam M; Rowland, Andrea; Tran, Tien; Denisov, Anton; Zaborovskii, Nikita; Raji, Oluwatodimu Richard.
в: Spine Deformity, Том 11, № 6, 11.2023, стр. 1335-1345.Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Spinolaminar locking plates improve fixation strength compared to pedicle screws
T2 - a biomechanical analysis
AU - Kondrashov, Dimitriy G
AU - Piple, Amit S
AU - Ungurean, Victor
AU - Schlauch, Adam M
AU - Rowland, Andrea
AU - Tran, Tien
AU - Denisov, Anton
AU - Zaborovskii, Nikita
AU - Raji, Oluwatodimu Richard
N1 - © 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.
PY - 2023/11
Y1 - 2023/11
N2 - INTRODUCTION: Pedicle screw loosening is a significant complication of posterior spinal fixation, particularly among osteoporotic patients and in deformity constructs. In orthopedic trauma surgery, locking plates and screws have revolutionized the fixation of osteoporotic fractures. We have combined the traumatology principle of fixed-angle locking plate fixation with the spine principles of segmental instrumentation.METHODS: A novel spinolaminar locking plate was designed based on morphometric studies of human thoracolumbar vertebrae. The plates were fixed to cadaveric human lumbar spines and connected to form 1-level L1-L2 or L4-L5 constructs and compared to similar pedicle screw constructs. Pure moment testing was performed to assess range of motion before and after 30,000 cycles of cyclic fatigue. Post-fatigue fixture pullout strength was assessed by applying a continuous axial tensile force oriented to the principal axis of the pedicle until pullout was observed.RESULTS: Spinolaminar plate fixation resulted in superior pullout strength compared to pedicle screws (1,065 ± 400N vs. 714 ± 284N, p = 0.028). Spinolaminar plates performed equivalently to pedicle screws in range of motion reduction during flexion/extension and axial rotation. Pedicle screws outperformed the spinolaminar plates in lateral bending. Finally, no spinolaminar constructs failed during cyclic fatigue testing, whereas one pedicle screw construct did.CONCLUSIONS: The spinolaminar locking plate maintained adequate fixation post-fatigue, particularly in flexion/extension and axial rotation compared to pedicle screws. Moreover, spinolaminar plates were superior to pedicle screw fixation with respect to cyclic fatiguing and pullout strength. The spinolaminar plates offer a viable option for posterior lumbar instrumentation in the adult spine.
AB - INTRODUCTION: Pedicle screw loosening is a significant complication of posterior spinal fixation, particularly among osteoporotic patients and in deformity constructs. In orthopedic trauma surgery, locking plates and screws have revolutionized the fixation of osteoporotic fractures. We have combined the traumatology principle of fixed-angle locking plate fixation with the spine principles of segmental instrumentation.METHODS: A novel spinolaminar locking plate was designed based on morphometric studies of human thoracolumbar vertebrae. The plates were fixed to cadaveric human lumbar spines and connected to form 1-level L1-L2 or L4-L5 constructs and compared to similar pedicle screw constructs. Pure moment testing was performed to assess range of motion before and after 30,000 cycles of cyclic fatigue. Post-fatigue fixture pullout strength was assessed by applying a continuous axial tensile force oriented to the principal axis of the pedicle until pullout was observed.RESULTS: Spinolaminar plate fixation resulted in superior pullout strength compared to pedicle screws (1,065 ± 400N vs. 714 ± 284N, p = 0.028). Spinolaminar plates performed equivalently to pedicle screws in range of motion reduction during flexion/extension and axial rotation. Pedicle screws outperformed the spinolaminar plates in lateral bending. Finally, no spinolaminar constructs failed during cyclic fatigue testing, whereas one pedicle screw construct did.CONCLUSIONS: The spinolaminar locking plate maintained adequate fixation post-fatigue, particularly in flexion/extension and axial rotation compared to pedicle screws. Moreover, spinolaminar plates were superior to pedicle screw fixation with respect to cyclic fatiguing and pullout strength. The spinolaminar plates offer a viable option for posterior lumbar instrumentation in the adult spine.
KW - Biomechanics
KW - Instrumentation
KW - Lumbar
KW - Pedicle screw
KW - Pullout
KW - Spinolaminar plate
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/4ce24b85-b6ee-3a96-bdcc-9f715c87168d/
U2 - 10.1007/s43390-023-00716-8
DO - 10.1007/s43390-023-00716-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 37329420
VL - 11
SP - 1335
EP - 1345
JO - Spine Deformity
JF - Spine Deformity
SN - 2212-134X
IS - 6
ER -
ID: 113774680