Результаты исследований: Публикации в книгах, отчётах, сборниках, трудах конференций › статья в сборнике материалов конференции › научная › Рецензирование
Software for Modeling Deliberative Argumentation : Requirements and Criteria. / Lisanyuk, Elena N.; Prokudin, Dmitry E.
Internet and Modern Society 2021: Proceedings of the International Conference "Internet and Modern Society" (IMS-2021), St. Petersburg, Russia 23-26 June 2021. Том 3090 RWTH Aahen University, 2022. стр. 11-23 (CEUR Workshop Proceedings; Том 3090).Результаты исследований: Публикации в книгах, отчётах, сборниках, трудах конференций › статья в сборнике материалов конференции › научная › Рецензирование
}
TY - GEN
T1 - Software for Modeling Deliberative Argumentation
T2 - Internet and Modern Society
AU - Lisanyuk, Elena N.
AU - Prokudin, Dmitry E.
N1 - Conference code: 24
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Methods of deliberative argumentation are widely employed for solving applied tasks in various fields of practical activities, where choosing of a line of behavior in a certain situation or making decisions is at stake. These methods enjoy permanent attention in the contemporary education with respect to teaching argumentation and training the critical thinking skills. In the last three decades, the progress in the information and communication technologies has led to the development of software designed for visualization and modeling of deliberative intellectual activity for solving various kinds of practical tasks and for supporting the relevant education. We propose the five (groups of) criteria for developing the software designed to model and represent deliberative argumentation, which have to be observed both in the development software and in its classification. We suggest four ontologies for such software, which will enhance implementing functions for evaluating arguments and finding solutions in such software.
AB - Methods of deliberative argumentation are widely employed for solving applied tasks in various fields of practical activities, where choosing of a line of behavior in a certain situation or making decisions is at stake. These methods enjoy permanent attention in the contemporary education with respect to teaching argumentation and training the critical thinking skills. In the last three decades, the progress in the information and communication technologies has led to the development of software designed for visualization and modeling of deliberative intellectual activity for solving various kinds of practical tasks and for supporting the relevant education. We propose the five (groups of) criteria for developing the software designed to model and represent deliberative argumentation, which have to be observed both in the development software and in its classification. We suggest four ontologies for such software, which will enhance implementing functions for evaluating arguments and finding solutions in such software.
KW - Conceptual bases
KW - Deliberative reasoning
KW - Modeling
KW - Representation
KW - Software
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125404756&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85125404756
VL - 3090
T3 - CEUR Workshop Proceedings
SP - 11
EP - 23
BT - Internet and Modern Society 2021
PB - RWTH Aahen University
Y2 - 24 June 2021 through 26 June 2021
ER -
ID: 92730522