Standard

Seeing Like a Starving State: The Soviet Political Economy of Death (and Life) in the Blockade of Leningrad. / Haas, J.K.; Lomagin, N.A.

в: Новейшая история России, Том 11, № 2, 2021, стр. 324-338.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

Haas, JK & Lomagin, NA 2021, 'Seeing Like a Starving State: The Soviet Political Economy of Death (and Life) in the Blockade of Leningrad', Новейшая история России, Том. 11, № 2, стр. 324-338.

APA

Vancouver

Author

Haas, J.K. ; Lomagin, N.A. / Seeing Like a Starving State: The Soviet Political Economy of Death (and Life) in the Blockade of Leningrad. в: Новейшая история России. 2021 ; Том 11, № 2. стр. 324-338.

BibTeX

@article{db225f1fc396404f8dc34db38fe91daf,
title = "Seeing Like a Starving State: The Soviet Political Economy of Death (and Life) in the Blockade of Leningrad",
abstract = "State elites and officials “see” their polities and societies through ideological and symbolic lenses that shape what they seek and perceive as they devise policies. But what happens to that sight and vision during moments of challenge and duress, and with what effect on policies? This article uses the example of the Blockade of Leningrad to begin an exploration of this subject. The pre-war Soviet state and Communist Party had a “double vision”, seeing Soviet society as an object for utopian plans and projects (a “high modernist” vision), and as an amorphous source of constant potential risk (e. g. counter-revolution). Extreme duress and challenges to survival from the Blockade challenged both facets of this double vision. What began to emerge was a more pragmatic vision centered on maintaining state authority and political order. We use state perception of and policies towards death and, as an extension, defending (civilian) life. Brief explorations of how state elites and officials perceived death, disposal labor (coping with corpses), and life (mothers) reveals a more realistic pragmatism, less deferent to ideology, beginning to emerge. We conclude that this points to a possible “Blockade Bolshevism” as a shifting formula of rule and possibilities of a “NEP reboot” lost to high Stalinism after the war.",
keywords = "blockade, Leningrad, World War II, stalinism, FOOD, rationing",
author = "J.K. Haas and N.A. Lomagin",
year = "2021",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "324--338",
journal = "Modern History of Russia",
issn = "2219-9659",
publisher = "Foundation for Research in Modern History",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Seeing Like a Starving State: The Soviet Political Economy of Death (and Life) in the Blockade of Leningrad

AU - Haas, J.K.

AU - Lomagin, N.A.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - State elites and officials “see” their polities and societies through ideological and symbolic lenses that shape what they seek and perceive as they devise policies. But what happens to that sight and vision during moments of challenge and duress, and with what effect on policies? This article uses the example of the Blockade of Leningrad to begin an exploration of this subject. The pre-war Soviet state and Communist Party had a “double vision”, seeing Soviet society as an object for utopian plans and projects (a “high modernist” vision), and as an amorphous source of constant potential risk (e. g. counter-revolution). Extreme duress and challenges to survival from the Blockade challenged both facets of this double vision. What began to emerge was a more pragmatic vision centered on maintaining state authority and political order. We use state perception of and policies towards death and, as an extension, defending (civilian) life. Brief explorations of how state elites and officials perceived death, disposal labor (coping with corpses), and life (mothers) reveals a more realistic pragmatism, less deferent to ideology, beginning to emerge. We conclude that this points to a possible “Blockade Bolshevism” as a shifting formula of rule and possibilities of a “NEP reboot” lost to high Stalinism after the war.

AB - State elites and officials “see” their polities and societies through ideological and symbolic lenses that shape what they seek and perceive as they devise policies. But what happens to that sight and vision during moments of challenge and duress, and with what effect on policies? This article uses the example of the Blockade of Leningrad to begin an exploration of this subject. The pre-war Soviet state and Communist Party had a “double vision”, seeing Soviet society as an object for utopian plans and projects (a “high modernist” vision), and as an amorphous source of constant potential risk (e. g. counter-revolution). Extreme duress and challenges to survival from the Blockade challenged both facets of this double vision. What began to emerge was a more pragmatic vision centered on maintaining state authority and political order. We use state perception of and policies towards death and, as an extension, defending (civilian) life. Brief explorations of how state elites and officials perceived death, disposal labor (coping with corpses), and life (mothers) reveals a more realistic pragmatism, less deferent to ideology, beginning to emerge. We conclude that this points to a possible “Blockade Bolshevism” as a shifting formula of rule and possibilities of a “NEP reboot” lost to high Stalinism after the war.

KW - blockade

KW - Leningrad

KW - World War II

KW - stalinism

KW - FOOD

KW - rationing

UR - https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46503530

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 324

EP - 338

JO - Modern History of Russia

JF - Modern History of Russia

SN - 2219-9659

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 74693523