Standard

Russia. / Bartenev, Dmitri; Evdokimova, Ekaterina.

The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Practice: A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Courts. ред. / Lisa Waddington. Oxford University Press, 2018. стр. 352-384.

Результаты исследований: Публикации в книгах, отчётах, сборниках, трудах конференций › глава/раздел › научная › Рецензирование

Harvard

Bartenev, D & Evdokimova, E 2018, Russia. в L Waddington (ред.), The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Practice: A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Courts. Oxford University Press, стр. 352-384. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198786627.003.0012

APA

Bartenev, D., & Evdokimova, E. (2018). Russia. в L. Waddington (Ред.), The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Practice: A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Courts (стр. 352-384). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198786627.003.0012

Vancouver

Bartenev D, Evdokimova E. Russia. в Waddington L, Редактор, The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Practice: A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Courts. Oxford University Press. 2018. стр. 352-384 https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198786627.003.0012

Author

Bartenev, Dmitri ; Evdokimova, Ekaterina. / Russia. The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Practice: A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Courts. Редактор / Lisa Waddington. Oxford University Press, 2018. стр. 352-384

BibTeX

@inbook{d6279017d52249a1840fea61ccb047f0,
title = "Russia",
abstract = "This chapter analyses how Russian courts have approached principles and standards of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) since its ratification by Russia in 2012. Given the monist features of the Russian legal system, the Convention has been used in a relatively large number of judgments. In the majority of cases the CRPD has been used only to reinforce the standards already provided by domestic laws. In a few cases, however, judges interpreted the Convention provisions to establish new legal concepts or to apply progressively Russian laws concerning human rights of people with disabilities. The chapter provides a critical insight into different ways of interpreting (or failing to interpret) CRPD provisions used by Russian courts and it concludes that the impact of the CRPD on case law has so far been limited despite its implementation in the Russian legal system.",
keywords = "Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), Courts, Disability rights, Interpretation, Monist, Russia",
author = "Dmitri Bartenev and Ekaterina Evdokimova",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Dmitri Bartenev and Ekaterina Evdokimova, 2018. All rights reserved. Copyright: Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2018",
month = jul,
day = "19",
doi = "10.1093/oso/9780198786627.003.0012",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780198786627",
pages = "352--384",
editor = "Lisa Waddington",
booktitle = "The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Practice",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Russia

AU - Bartenev, Dmitri

AU - Evdokimova, Ekaterina

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Dmitri Bartenev and Ekaterina Evdokimova, 2018. All rights reserved. Copyright: Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2018/7/19

Y1 - 2018/7/19

N2 - This chapter analyses how Russian courts have approached principles and standards of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) since its ratification by Russia in 2012. Given the monist features of the Russian legal system, the Convention has been used in a relatively large number of judgments. In the majority of cases the CRPD has been used only to reinforce the standards already provided by domestic laws. In a few cases, however, judges interpreted the Convention provisions to establish new legal concepts or to apply progressively Russian laws concerning human rights of people with disabilities. The chapter provides a critical insight into different ways of interpreting (or failing to interpret) CRPD provisions used by Russian courts and it concludes that the impact of the CRPD on case law has so far been limited despite its implementation in the Russian legal system.

AB - This chapter analyses how Russian courts have approached principles and standards of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) since its ratification by Russia in 2012. Given the monist features of the Russian legal system, the Convention has been used in a relatively large number of judgments. In the majority of cases the CRPD has been used only to reinforce the standards already provided by domestic laws. In a few cases, however, judges interpreted the Convention provisions to establish new legal concepts or to apply progressively Russian laws concerning human rights of people with disabilities. The chapter provides a critical insight into different ways of interpreting (or failing to interpret) CRPD provisions used by Russian courts and it concludes that the impact of the CRPD on case law has so far been limited despite its implementation in the Russian legal system.

KW - Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD)

KW - Courts

KW - Disability rights

KW - Interpretation

KW - Monist

KW - Russia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059223086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/oso/9780198786627.003.0012

DO - 10.1093/oso/9780198786627.003.0012

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85044621680

SN - 9780198786627

SP - 352

EP - 384

BT - The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Practice

A2 - Waddington, Lisa

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -

ID: 28258573