Standard

Resilience in discourses of the European Union and international organizations. / Treshchenkov, Evgeny.

в: International Organisations Research Journal, Том 14, № 1, 01.01.2019, стр. 55-75.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Treshchenkov, Evgeny. / Resilience in discourses of the European Union and international organizations. в: International Organisations Research Journal. 2019 ; Том 14, № 1. стр. 55-75.

BibTeX

@article{a71c475314724b94ade988ddb815bed0,
title = "Resilience in discourses of the European Union and international organizations",
abstract = "Lately, the European Union (EU) has faced multiple internal and external challenges. The conceptual response of EU institutions was {"}A Global Strategy for the European Union's Foreign and Security Policy{"} (June 2016). At the core of the understanding of what was happening, as well as of the prospects of overcoming those crises, sat the concept of {"}resilience.{"} It has been some time since this concept appeared in the discourses of international organizations and its meaning remains volatile, situational and dependent on the scope of application, the relevant context and the authorship. The purpose of this study is to examine the specificity of use of the concept of resilience in the discourses of the EU and various international organizations, as well as the interrelation between those uses. The sample encompasses organizations of particular importance to the European integration project and to global and regional governance, including the Council of Europe, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and those which comprise the United Nations system (the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank, etc.). Since the empirical material consists mostly of official texts produced by international organizations, the preferred method of study is discourse analysis. The analysis examines the Brussels-advanced notion of resilience from a more distant perspective, namely, within the coordinate system of global and regional governance represented by Western-dominated multilateral institutions. The study identifies channels and agents responsible for the concept's penetration into the discourses of the EU and other international organizations. Conclusions are drawn regarding similarities and divergences in the articulations of resilience. Particular focus is put on the interrelation between the concept and the neo-liberal approach to risk management and security.",
keywords = "European Union, Experts, Governance, Neo-liberalism, Resilience, Security, United Nations, Безопасность, Европейский союз, Неолиберализм, ООН, Стрессоустойчивость, Управление, Эксперты, European Union, Experts, Governance, Neo-liberalism, Resilience, Security, United Nations, Безопасность, Европейский союз, Неолиберализм, ООН, Стрессоустойчивость, Управление, Эксперты, security, neo-liberalism, experts, resilience, governance",
author = "Evgeny Treshchenkov",
year = "2019",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.17323/1996-7845-2019-01-04",
language = "Английский",
volume = "14",
pages = "55--75",
journal = "ВЕСТНИК МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫХ ОРГАНИЗАЦИЙ: ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ, НАУКА, НОВАЯ ЭКОНОМИКА",
issn = "1996-7845",
publisher = "Издательский дом НИУ ВШЭ",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resilience in discourses of the European Union and international organizations

AU - Treshchenkov, Evgeny

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Lately, the European Union (EU) has faced multiple internal and external challenges. The conceptual response of EU institutions was "A Global Strategy for the European Union's Foreign and Security Policy" (June 2016). At the core of the understanding of what was happening, as well as of the prospects of overcoming those crises, sat the concept of "resilience." It has been some time since this concept appeared in the discourses of international organizations and its meaning remains volatile, situational and dependent on the scope of application, the relevant context and the authorship. The purpose of this study is to examine the specificity of use of the concept of resilience in the discourses of the EU and various international organizations, as well as the interrelation between those uses. The sample encompasses organizations of particular importance to the European integration project and to global and regional governance, including the Council of Europe, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and those which comprise the United Nations system (the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank, etc.). Since the empirical material consists mostly of official texts produced by international organizations, the preferred method of study is discourse analysis. The analysis examines the Brussels-advanced notion of resilience from a more distant perspective, namely, within the coordinate system of global and regional governance represented by Western-dominated multilateral institutions. The study identifies channels and agents responsible for the concept's penetration into the discourses of the EU and other international organizations. Conclusions are drawn regarding similarities and divergences in the articulations of resilience. Particular focus is put on the interrelation between the concept and the neo-liberal approach to risk management and security.

AB - Lately, the European Union (EU) has faced multiple internal and external challenges. The conceptual response of EU institutions was "A Global Strategy for the European Union's Foreign and Security Policy" (June 2016). At the core of the understanding of what was happening, as well as of the prospects of overcoming those crises, sat the concept of "resilience." It has been some time since this concept appeared in the discourses of international organizations and its meaning remains volatile, situational and dependent on the scope of application, the relevant context and the authorship. The purpose of this study is to examine the specificity of use of the concept of resilience in the discourses of the EU and various international organizations, as well as the interrelation between those uses. The sample encompasses organizations of particular importance to the European integration project and to global and regional governance, including the Council of Europe, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and those which comprise the United Nations system (the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank, etc.). Since the empirical material consists mostly of official texts produced by international organizations, the preferred method of study is discourse analysis. The analysis examines the Brussels-advanced notion of resilience from a more distant perspective, namely, within the coordinate system of global and regional governance represented by Western-dominated multilateral institutions. The study identifies channels and agents responsible for the concept's penetration into the discourses of the EU and other international organizations. Conclusions are drawn regarding similarities and divergences in the articulations of resilience. Particular focus is put on the interrelation between the concept and the neo-liberal approach to risk management and security.

KW - European Union

KW - Experts

KW - Governance

KW - Neo-liberalism

KW - Resilience

KW - Security

KW - United Nations

KW - Безопасность

KW - Европейский союз

KW - Неолиберализм

KW - ООН

KW - Стрессоустойчивость

KW - Управление

KW - Эксперты

KW - European Union

KW - Experts

KW - Governance

KW - Neo-liberalism

KW - Resilience

KW - Security

KW - United Nations

KW - Безопасность

KW - Европейский союз

KW - Неолиберализм

KW - ООН

KW - Стрессоустойчивость

KW - Управление

KW - Эксперты

KW - security

KW - neo-liberalism

KW - experts

KW - resilience

KW - governance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064737355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/resilience-discourses-european-union-international-organizations

U2 - 10.17323/1996-7845-2019-01-04

DO - 10.17323/1996-7845-2019-01-04

M3 - статья

AN - SCOPUS:85064737355

VL - 14

SP - 55

EP - 75

JO - ВЕСТНИК МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫХ ОРГАНИЗАЦИЙ: ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ, НАУКА, НОВАЯ ЭКОНОМИКА

JF - ВЕСТНИК МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫХ ОРГАНИЗАЦИЙ: ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ, НАУКА, НОВАЯ ЭКОНОМИКА

SN - 1996-7845

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 42327503